The effectiveness of dual offset stems in restoring offset during total hip replacement

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 490-499

  Dolhain, P ^a,b   Tsigaras, H ^a   Bourne, R B ^a   Rorabeck, C H ^a   Mac Donald, S ^a   Mc Calden, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Femoral component; Offset; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE STRENGTH; FEMALE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JOINT STABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 0036937111     PISSN: 00016462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abraham W. D., Dimon J. H. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. N. Am., 1992, 23, 2, 201-09.
2. Blaimont P., Delronge B., Smeyers B. et al. Etude anatomique et extensométrique concernant la collerette d'appui et le manche de la prothèse, base de la conception d'une prothèse anatomique. Acta Orthop Belg., 1993, 59 (suppl. 1),170.
3. Bourne R. B., Rorabeck C. H., Patterson J. J., Guerin J. Tapered titanium cementless total hip replacements: a ten to thirteen year follow-up. Clin. Orthop., 2001, 393, 112-20.
4. Bourne R. B., Rorabeck Ch., Skutek M., Mikkelsen S. et al. The Harris design-2 total hip replacement fixed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg., 1998, 80-A, 12, 1775-80.
5. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. New York. Springer-Verlag. 1979, 336-344.
6. Clark J. M., Freeman M. A., Witham D. The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur. J. Arthroplasty, 1987, 2, 99-109.
7. D'Antonio J. A. Preoperative templating and choosing the implant for primary total hip arthroplasty in the young patient. Instr. Course Lect., 1994, 43, 339-346.
8. Davey J. R., O'Connor D. O., Burke D. W., Harris W. H. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J. Arthroplasty, 1993, 8; 1; 23-26.
9. Devane P. A., Horne J. G. Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. 1999, 369; 59-72.
10. Dorr D. D., Rubash H. Primary THA in the older patient: optimising the results. Instr. Course Lect. 1994, 43, 347-357.
11. Fackler C. D., Poss R. Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop., 1980, 151, 169-178.
12. th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, 1995.
13. Hodge W. A., Andriacchi T. P., Galante J. O. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty, 1991, 6, 229-235.
14. Huddleston H. D. An accurate method for measuring leg length and hip offset in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics; 1997, 20, 4331-332.
15. th annual meeting, Montreal, Quebec, June 1993.
16. Kelikian A. S., Tachdjian M. O., Askew M. J., Jasty M. Greater trochanteric advancement of the proximal femur: a clinical and biomechanical study. In: Hungerford D. S., ed. The Hip. Procs. of the Eleventh Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St-Louis: CV Mosby 77-105. 1983.
17. Knight W. E. Accurate determination of leg length during total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 1977, 123, 27.
18. Lindgren J. U., Rysavy J. Restoration of femoral offset during hip replacement. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1992, 63, 407-410.
19. Massin P., Geais L., Astoin E. et al. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems. A frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur. J. Arthroplasty, 2000, 15, 1, 93-101.
20. McCarthy J. C., Bono J. V., O'Donnell P. J. et al. Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 1997; 344: 162-171.
21. McGrory J. B., Morrey B. F., Cahalan T. D. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg., 1995, 77-B, 865-869.
22. Morrey B. F. Difficult complications after hip joint replacements. Dislocation. Clin. Orthop., 1997, 344, 179-187.
23. Mulroy R. D. jr, Harris W. H. The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1990, 72-B, 757-60.
24. Mulroy W. F., Harris W. H. Acetabular and femoral fixation 15 years after cemented total hip surgery. Clin Orthop., 1997, 337, 118-128.
25. Noble P. C., Alexander J. W., Lindahl L. J. et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin. Orthop., 1988, 235, 148.
26. Noble P. C., Box G. G., Kamaric E. et al. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin. Orthop., 1995, 316, 31.
27. nd annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, 1995.
28. th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. San Francisco, CA, 1993.
29. Rubin P. J., Leyvraz P. F., Aubaniac J. M. et al. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three dimensional radiographic analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg., 1992, 74-B; 28.
30. Sakalkale D. P., Sharkey P. F., Eng K., Hozack W. J., Rothman R. H. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 2001, 388, 125-34.
31. Schmalzried T. P., Sheperd E. F., Dorey F. J., Jackson W. O., dela Rosa M., Fa'vae F., McKellop H. A., McClung C. D., Martell J., Moreland J. R., Amstutz H. C. The John Charnley Award: Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin. Orthop., 2000, 381, 36-46
32. Steinberg B., Harris W. H. The "offset" problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp. Orthop., 1992, 24, 556-62.
33. Woolson S. T. Leg length equalisation during total hip replacement. Orthopaedics. 1990, 13, 17-21.
34. Woolson S. T., Harris W. H. A method of intraoperative limb length measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1985, 194, 207-210.