Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Kurtz, William B ^a   Ecker, Timo M ^b   Reichmann, William M ^b   Murphy, Stephen B ^b  

^a Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance   (United States)

^b NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetabular offset; Bony impingement; Center of rotation; Hip arthroplasty range of motion

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR HEIGHT; ACETABULAR OFFSET; ADULT; ANTEVERSION; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMORAL HEIGHT; FEMORAL OFFSET; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; LIMB DISEASE; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OSTEOPHYTE; RANGE OF MOTION; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENTIATION;

EID: 77953122096     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Hirakawa K., Mitsugi N., Koshino T., et al. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 135.
2. Pagnano W., Hanssen A.D., Lewallen D.G., et al. The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:1004.
3. McQueary F.G., Johnston R.C. Coxarthrosis after congenital dysplasia. Treatment by total hip arthroplasty without acetabular bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988, 70:1140.
4. Linde F., Jensen J., Pilgaard S. Charnley arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 227:164.
5. Kelley S.S. High hip center in revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:503.
6. Karachalios T., Hartofilakidis G., Zacharakis N., et al. A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 140.
7. Kobayashi S., Takaoka K., Saito N., et al. Factors affecting aseptic failure of fixation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79:1618.
8. Ranawat C.S., Dorr L.D., Inglis A.E. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980, 62:1059.
9. Gore D.R., Murray M.P., Gardner G.M., et al. Roentgenographic measurements after Muller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59:948.
10. Russotti G.M., Harris W.H. Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73:587.
11. Callaghan J.J. Results of revision for mechanical failure after THA. JBJS 1985, 67A:1074.
12. Dearborn J.T., Harris W.H. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81:469.
13. Charnley J., Feagin J.A. Low-friction arthroplasty in congenital subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973, 98.
14. Yoder S.A., Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., et al. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 79.
15. Jasty M., Anderson M.J., Harris W.H. Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 40.
16. Dorr L.D., Tawakkol S., Moorthy M., et al. Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81:83.
17. Sakalkale D.P., Sharkey P.F., Eng K., et al. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 125.
18. Denham R.A. Hip mechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1959, 41-B:550.
19. Inman V.T. Functional aspects of abductor muscles of the hip. JBJS 1947, 29:607.
20. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty 1974.
21. Johnston R.C., Brand R.A., Crowninshield R.D. Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979, 61:639.
22. Delp S.L., Wixson R.L., Komattu A.V., et al. How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 137.
23. Doehring T.C., Rubash H.E., Shelley F.J., et al. Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:693.
24. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970, 72:7.
25. Pauwels F. Die Bedeutung der Bauprinzipien des Stutz und Bewegungsapparantes fur die Beansprunchung der Rohrenknochen. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 1948, 114:129.
26. Asayama I., Chamnongkich S., Simpson K.J., et al. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:414.
27. McGrory B.J., Morrey B.F., Cahalan T.D., et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995, 77:865.
28. Wroblewski B.M., Siney P.D., Fleming P.A. Wear of the cup in the Charnley LFA in the young patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:498.
29. Schmalzried T.P., Shepherd E.F., Dorey F.J., et al. The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 36.
30. Krushell R.J., Burke D.W., Harris W.H. Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. J Arthroplasty 1991, 6:97.
31. Kummer F.J., Shah S., Iyer S., et al. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:509.
32. Chandler D.R., Glousman R., Hull D., et al. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 284.
33. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:11.
34. Amstutz H.C., Lodwig R.M., Schurman D.J., et al. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975, 124.
35. Gondi G., Roberson J.R., Ganey T.M., et al. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. J South Orthop Assoc 1997, 6:266.
36. Bartz R.L., Nobel P.C., Kadakia N.R., et al. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:1300.
37. D'Lima D.D., Urquhart A.G., Buehler K.O., et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:315.
38. Yoshimine F., Ginbayashi K.A. Mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. J Biomech 2002, 35:989.
39. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:815.
40. Widmer K.H., Majewski M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005, 20:723.
41. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 2005.
42. D'Lima D.D., Chen P.C., Colwell C.W. Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A(Suppl 2 Pt 2):87.
43. Seki M., Yuasa N., Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:513.
44. Robinson R.P. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in THA. JBJS 1997, 79-B:140.
45. Kessler O., Patil S., Stefan W., et al. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: a subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 2008, 26:443.
46. Jaramaz B., DiGioia A.M., Blackwell M., et al. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 2:70.
47. Murphy S.B., Kijewski P.K., Millis M.B., et al. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 214.
48. Murphy S.B., Simon S.R., Kijewski P.K., et al. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987, 69:1169.
49. Tannast M., Kubiak-Langer M., Langlotz F., et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 2007, 25:122.
50. Jolles B.M., Zangger P., Leyvraz P.F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:282.
51. Loughead J.M., Chesney D., Holland J.P., et al. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:163.
52. Nadzadi M.E. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocations. J Biomech 2003, 36:577.
53. Johnston R.C., Smidt G.L. Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970, 72:205.
54. Ranawat C., Maynard M.J. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 1991, 6:17.
55. Lucas D., Scott R.D. The Ranawat sign: a specific maneuver to assess component positioning in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Tech 1994, 2:59.