Coronary computed tomography angiography in a single cardiac cycle with a mean radiation dose of approximately 1 mSv: Initial experience;Coronariografia por tomografia computorizada num único ciclo cardíaco com dose de radiação média de aproximadamente 1 mSv: Experiência inicial

Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1667-1676

  Duarte, Ricardo ^a,b   Bettencourt, Nuno ^a   Costa, João C ^b   Fernandez, Gabriel ^c  

^a CENTRO HOSPITALAR DE VILA NOVA DE GAIA ESPINHO   (Portugal)

^b João Carlos Costa Diagnóstico Por Imagem ^*  (Portugal)

^c HOSPITAL POVISA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coronary CT angiography; Flash; Prospective high pitch spiral acquisition; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE; METOPROLOL; METOPROLOL TARTRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPY; DRUG MEGADOSE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CYCLE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; RADIATION DOSE; RATING SCALE; SINUS RHYTHM;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78751698071     PISSN: 08702551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell J, Hamon M. Coronary Arteries: Diagnostic Performance of 16- versus 64-Section Spiral CT Compared with Invasive Coronary Angiography-Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2007; 245: 720-721.
2. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:147-154 (Pubitemid 40905143)
3. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112:2318-2323
4. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:575-582
5. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-1487 (Pubitemid 41378989)
6. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557
7. Mayo J, Leipsic J. Radiation Dose in Cardiac CT. AJR 2009; 192:646-653.
8. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, et al. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004; 231:393-398.
9. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR 2005; 185:1228-1233
10. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009; 301:500-507.
11. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus Retrospective ECG-gated 64-Detector Coronary CT Angiography: Assessment of Image Quality, Stenosis, and Radiation Dose. Radiology 2008; 248: 424-433.
12. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Influence of Reconstruction Technique and Heart Rate on Image Quality. Radiology 2006; 238:75-86. (Pubitemid 43010582)
13. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus Retrospective ECG Gating for 64-Detector CT of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose. Radiology 2008; 248:431-440.
14. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. European Heart Journal 2008; 29:191-197.
15. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al. Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose. Radiology 2008; 246:742-753.
16. Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, et al. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:1450-5.
17. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:346-55.
18. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:340-6.
19. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:2896-903
20. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:2576-83.
21. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography: Appendix C Funded by the European Commission; March 2004. Contract No. FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP http://www.msct.eu/PDF-FILES/ EC%20CA%20Report%20D5%20-%20Dosimetry.pdf (12 January 2009).
22. Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1188-1198.
23. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1840-1845.
24. Hoe J, Toh KH. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:257-61.
25. Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010;254:698-706.
26. Wolf F, Leschka S, Loewe C, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode. Eur Radiol. 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
27. Goetti R, Baumüller S, Feuchtner G, et al. High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: is simultaneous coronary artery assessment possible? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:938-44.
28. Chinnaiyan KM, Raff GL, Goldstein JA. Cardiac CT in the emergency department. Cardiol Clin. 2009;27:587-96.
29. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology. 2010;254:410-9.