Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters

Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 89-95

  Bos, Nathan D ^a   Buyuktur, Ayse ^b   Olson, Judith S ^c   Olson, Gary M ^c   Voida, Amy ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

coordination; distributed work; group efficacy; group identity; partially distributed teams; shared identity

Indexed keywords

COORDINATION; DISTRIBUTED TEAMS; DISTRIBUTED WORK; GROUP EFFICACY; GROUP IDENTITY; SHARED IDENTITY;

EID: 78751691434     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1880071.1880086     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bos, N.D, Shami, N.S., Olson, J.S., Cheshin, A. & Nan, N. (2004) In-group/ out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation. Proceedings of CSCW 2004. New York: ACM Press.
2. Bos, N.D., Olson, J.S., Nan, N., Shami, N.S., Hoch, S., Johnston, E. (2006). Collocation blindness in partially distributed groups: is there a downside to being collocated? Proceedings of CHI 2006. New York: ACM Press.
3. Carroll, J., Rosson, M.B. & Zhou, J. (2005). Collective Efficacy as a Measure of Community. Proceedings of CHI 2005: New York, ACM Press.
4. Ellemers, N.; de Gilder, D.; Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance. Academy of Management Review 29(3), 459-478.
5. Fiol, C. M. & E. J. O'Connor. (2005). Identification in face-to- face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science. 16(1), 19-32.
6. Gibson, C. B. (1999) Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol 42(2), 138-152.
7. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 51, 451-495.
8. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: the evolution of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.
9. Henry, K.B., Arrow, H. and Carini, B. (1999) A Tripartite model of group identity. Small Group Research, (30) 5, 558-581.
10. Malone, T. (2004) The Future of Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
11. Olson, G.M., & Olson, J.S. (2000) Distance matters. Human- Computer Interaction, 15, 139-179.
12. Perugini, N.; Gallucci, M.; Presaghi, F.; & Ercolani, A.P. (2002). The Personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17 (4).
13. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation in social groups: Studies in social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.