Dual role of protein phosphorylation in DNA activator/coactivator binding

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 469-477

  Dadarlat, Voichita M ^a   Skeel, Robert D ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751690788     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.053     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Montminy, M. R., K. A. Sevarino,..., R. H. Goodman. 1986. Identification of a cyclic-AMP-responsive element within the rat somatostatin gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83:6682-6686.
2. Gu, W., X. L. Shi, and R. G. Roeder. 1997. Synergistic activation of transcription by CBP and p53. Nature. 387:819-823.
3. Nasrin, N., S. Ogg,..., M. C. Alexander-Bridges. 2000. DAF-16 recruits the CREB-binding protein coactivator complex to the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 promoter in HepG2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:10412-10417.
4. Blobel, G. A., T. Nakajima,..., S. H. Orkin. 1998. CREB-binding protein cooperates with transcription factor GATA-1 and is required for erythroid differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:2061-2066.
5. Doucas, V. M., M. Tini,..., R. M. Evans. 1999. Modulation of CREB binding protein function by the promyelocytic (PML) oncoprotein suggests a role for nuclear bodies in hormone signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:2627-2632.
6. Kamei, Y., L. Xu,..., M. G. Rosenfeld. 1996. A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell. 85:403-414.
7. Shaywitz, A. J., S. L. Dove,..., M. E. Greenberg. 2000. Magnitude of the CREB-dependent transcriptional response is determined by the strength of the interaction between the kinase inducible domain of CREB and the KIX domain of CBP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:9409-9422.
8. Radhakrishnan, I., G. C. Pérez-Alvarado,..., P. E. Wright. 1997. Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions. Cell. 91:741-752.
9. Sugase, K., H. J. Dyson, and P. E. Wright. 2007. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature. 447:1021-1025.
10. Mandell, D. J., I. Chorny,..., M. P. Jacobson. 2007. Strengths of hydrogen bonds involving phosphorylated amino acid side chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:820-827.
11. Shaywitz, A. J., and M. E. Greenberg. 1999. CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:821-861.
12. Woo, H.-J., and B. Roux. 2005. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:6825-6830.
13. Parker, D., M. Rivera,..., P. K. Brindle. 1999. Role of secondary structure in discrimination between constitutive and inducible activators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5601-5607.
14. Turjanski, A. G., J. S. Gutkind,..., G. Hummer. 2008. Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4: e1000060.
15. Zor, T., B. M. Mayr,..., P. E. Wright. 2002. Roles of phosphorylation and helix propensity in the binding of the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein by constitutive (c-Myb) and inducible (CREB) activators. J. Biol. Chem. 277:42241-42248.
16. Mestas, S. P., and K. J. Lumb. 1999. Electrostatic contribution of phosphorylation to the stability of the CREB-CBP activator-coactivator complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:613-614.
17. Dal Peraro, M., F. Alber, and P. Carloni. 2001. Ser133 phosphate-KIX interactions in the CREB-CBP complex: an ab initio molecular dynamics study. Eur. Biophys. J. 30:75-81.
18. Dadarlat, V. M. 2005. Potentials of mean force for the interaction of blocked alanine dipeptide molecules in water and gas phase from MD simulations. Biophys. J. 89:1433-1445.
19. Hamelberg, D., and J. A. McCammon. 2004. Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:7683-7689.
20. Deng, Y., and B. Roux. 2009. Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 113:2234-2246.
21. Woo, H.-J. 2008. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method. In Molecular Modeling of Proteins, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 443. A. Kukol, editor. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 109-120.
22. Wang, J., Y. Deng, and B. Roux. 2006. Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. Biophys. J. 91:2798-2814. http://www.biophysj.org/cgi/content/abstract/91/8/ 2798.
23. Matsuno, H., H. Furusawa, and Y. Okahata. 2004. Kinetic study of phosphorylation-dependent complex formation between the kinaseinducible domain (KID) of CREB and the KIX domain of CBP on a quartz crystal microbalance. Chemistry. 10:6172-6178.
24. Johnson, L. N., and M. O'Reilly. 1996. Control by phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:762-769.
25. Ganguly, D., and J. Chen. 2009. Atomistic details of the disordered states of KID and pKID. Implications in coupled binding and folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:5214-5223.
26. Solt, I., C. Magyar,..., M. Fuxreiter. 2006. Phosphorylation-induced transient intrinsic structure in the kinase-inducible domain of CREB facilitates its recognition by the KIX domain of CBP. Proteins. 64:749-757.
27. Müller-Späth, S., A. Soranno,..., B. Schuler. 2010. Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:14519-14520.
28. Hilser, V. J., and E. B. Thompson. 2007. Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:8311-8315.
29. Wright, P. E., and H. J. Dyson. 1999. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293:321-331.
30. Dunker, A. K., J. D. Lawson,..., Z. Obradovic. 2001. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 19:26-59.