-
1
-
-
0031859696
-
American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening
-
Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:29-33.
-
(1998)
AJR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.171
, pp. 29-33
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
D'Orsi, C.J.2
Hendrick, R.E.3
-
2
-
-
0037015185
-
Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the US. Preventive Services Task Force
-
Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-60.
-
(2002)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.137
, pp. 347-360
-
-
Humphrey, L.L.1
Helfand, M.2
Chan, B.K.S.3
Woolf, S.H.4
-
4
-
-
0033889950
-
The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later
-
Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H-H, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Radiol Clin N Am 2000;38:625-52.
-
(2000)
Radiol Clin N Am
, vol.38
, pp. 625-652
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Vitak, B.2
Chen, H.-H.3
-
5
-
-
0033526560
-
14 Years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomized trial of breast cancer screening
-
Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomized trial of breast cancer screening. Lancet 1999;353:1903-8.
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.353
, pp. 1903-1908
-
-
Alexander, F.E.1
Anderson, T.J.2
Brown, H.K.3
-
6
-
-
85069515073
-
Mammographic screening trial
-
Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1998;297:943-48.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.297
, pp. 943-948
-
-
Andersson, I.1
Aspegren, K.2
Janzon, L.3
-
7
-
-
0030662275
-
Follow-up after 11 years: Update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial
-
Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE. Follow-up after 11 years: update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;45:263-70.
-
(1997)
Breast Cancer Res Treat
, vol.45
, pp. 263-270
-
-
Frisell, J.1
Lidbrink, E.2
Hellstrom, L.3
Rutqvist, L.E.4
-
8
-
-
0038032765
-
The Gothenburg breast screening trial
-
Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial. Cancer 2003;97:2387-96.
-
(2003)
Cancer
, vol.97
, pp. 2387-2396
-
-
Bjurstam, N.1
Bjorneld, L.2
Warwick, J.3
-
9
-
-
0034692449
-
Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-Year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years
-
Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study -2:13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1490-99.
-
(2000)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.92
, pp. 1490-1499
-
-
Miller, A.B.1
To, T.2
Baines, C.J.3
Wall, C.4
-
10
-
-
0037015214
-
The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast cancer mortality after 11-16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40-49 years
-
Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study -1: Breast cancer mortality after 11-16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40-49 years. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:305-12.
-
(2002)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.137
, pp. 305-312
-
-
Miller, A.B.1
Baines, C.J.2
To, T.3
Wall, C.4
-
11
-
-
0027368607
-
The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: A critical review
-
Kopans DB, Feig SA. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a critical review. AJR Am Roentgenol 1993;161:755-60.
-
(1993)
AJR Am Roentgenol
, vol.161
, pp. 755-760
-
-
Kopans, D.B.1
Feig, S.A.2
-
12
-
-
0029001421
-
Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years
-
Feig SA. Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years. Cancer 1995;75:2412-19.
-
(1995)
Cancer
, vol.75
, pp. 2412-2419
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
13
-
-
0028099616
-
Determination of mammographic screening intervals with surrogate measures for women aged 40-49 years
-
Feig SA. Determination of mammographic screening intervals with surrogate measures for women aged 40-49 years. Radiology 1994;193:311-14.
-
(1994)
Radiology
, vol.193
, pp. 311-314
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
14
-
-
0030725308
-
Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years
-
Feig SA. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years. Cancer 1997;80:2035-39.
-
(1997)
Cancer
, vol.80
, pp. 2035-2039
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
15
-
-
0031316208
-
Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: A new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH III, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;33:87-92.
-
(1997)
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.33
, pp. 87-92
-
-
Hendrick, R.E.1
Smith, R.A.2
Rutledge III, J.H.3
Smart, C.R.4
-
16
-
-
0023807208
-
Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial
-
Chu KC, Smart CR, Tarone RE. Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:1125-32.
-
(1988)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.80
, pp. 1125-1132
-
-
Chu, K.C.1
Smart, C.R.2
Tarone, R.E.3
-
17
-
-
1842335164
-
The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial: First results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization
-
Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997;80:2091-99.
-
(1997)
Cancer
, vol.80
, pp. 2091-2099
-
-
Bjurstam, N.1
Bjorneld, L.2
Duffy, S.W.3
-
18
-
-
0031323346
-
Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under 50: Updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program
-
Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:63-68.
-
(1997)
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.22
, pp. 63-68
-
-
Andersson, I.1
Janzon, L.2
-
19
-
-
0036129089
-
Screening mammography: Effect of image quality on clinical outcome
-
Feig SA. Screening mammography: effect of image quality on clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:805-7.
-
(2002)
AJR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.178
, pp. 805-807
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
20
-
-
0036682064
-
Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma
-
Feig SA. Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95:451-57.
-
(2002)
Cancer
, vol.95
, pp. 451-457
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
21
-
-
0035339809
-
Beyond randomized trials: Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality
-
Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H-H, Yen M-F, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91:1724-31.
-
(2001)
Cancer
, vol.91
, pp. 1724-1731
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Vitak, B.2
Chen, H.-H.3
Yen, M.-F.4
Duffy, S.W.5
Smith, R.A.6
-
22
-
-
0036682059
-
The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties: A collaborative evaluation
-
Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen H-H, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties: a collaborative evaluation. Cancer 2002;95:458-69.
-
(2002)
Cancer
, vol.95
, pp. 458-469
-
-
Duffy, S.W.1
Tabar, L.2
Chen, H.-H.3
-
23
-
-
0034620242
-
Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
-
Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000;355:129-34.
-
(2000)
Lancet
, vol.355
, pp. 129-134
-
-
Gotzsche, P.C.1
Olsen, O.2
-
24
-
-
0035922670
-
Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography
-
Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001;358:1340-42.
-
(2001)
Lancet
, vol.358
, pp. 1340-1342
-
-
Olsen, O.1
Gotzsche, P.C.2
-
25
-
-
12244254445
-
All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: Support for breast cancer mortality as an endpoint
-
Tabar L, Duffy SW, Yen M-F, et al. All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an endpoint. J Med Screen 2002;9:159-62.
-
(2002)
J Med Screen
, vol.9
, pp. 159-162
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Duffy, S.W.2
Yen, M.-F.3
-
26
-
-
0036196117
-
The mammographic screening trials: Commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche
-
Duffy SW, Tabar L, Smith RA. The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:68-71.
-
(2002)
CA Cancer J Clin
, vol.52
, pp. 68-71
-
-
Duffy, S.W.1
Tabar, L.2
Smith, R.A.3
-
27
-
-
0642283611
-
How reliable is the evidence for screening mammography?
-
Feig SA. How reliable is the evidence for screening mammography? Recent Results Cancer Res 2002;163:129-39.
-
(2002)
Recent Results Cancer Res
, vol.163
, pp. 129-139
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
28
-
-
4444295767
-
Adverse effects of screening mammography
-
Feig SA. Adverse effects of screening mammography. Radiol Clin N Am 2004;42:807-19.
-
(2004)
Radiol Clin N Am
, vol.42
, pp. 807-819
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
29
-
-
0031322032
-
Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years
-
Feig SA, Hendrick RE. Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:119-24.
-
(1997)
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.22
, pp. 119-124
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
Hendrick, R.E.2
-
31
-
-
0038413465
-
-
Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute
-
Ries L, Eisner MP, Kosary C, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003.
-
(2003)
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000
-
-
Ries, L.1
Eisner, M.P.2
Kosary, C.3
-
32
-
-
0025210597
-
Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: Methodology and results of 27,114 examinations
-
Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollito RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990;175:323-27.
-
(1990)
Radiology
, vol.175
, pp. 323-327
-
-
Sickles, E.A.1
Ominsky, S.H.2
Sollito, R.A.3
Galvin, H.B.4
Monticciolo, D.L.5
-
33
-
-
0029951393
-
Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography. There is no abrupt change at age 50 years
-
Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography. There is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology 1996;200:357-60.
-
(1996)
Radiology
, vol.200
, pp. 357-360
-
-
Kopans, D.B.1
Moore, R.H.2
McCarthy, K.A.3
-
34
-
-
0037120975
-
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography
-
Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Bartow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1546-54.
-
(2002)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.94
, pp. 1546-1554
-
-
Ernster, V.L.1
Ballard-Barbash, R.2
Bartow, W.E.3
-
35
-
-
0030927336
-
Twenty-year follow-up of breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project
-
Smart CR, Byrne C, Smith RA, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:134-49.
-
(1997)
CA Cancer J Clin
, vol.47
, pp. 134-149
-
-
Smart, C.R.1
Byrne, C.2
Smith, R.A.3
-
36
-
-
0028587688
-
Non-invasive breast cancer: The dilemma of the 1990s
-
Silverstein M. Non-invasive breast cancer: the dilemma of the 1990s. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1994;21:639-58.
-
(1994)
Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am
, vol.21
, pp. 639-658
-
-
Silverstein, M.1
-
37
-
-
0029995273
-
Incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
-
Ernster FL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson IC. Incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 1996;275:913-18.
-
(1996)
JAMA
, vol.275
, pp. 913-918
-
-
Ernster, F.L.1
Barclay, J.2
Kerlikowske, K.3
Grady, D.4
Henderson, I.C.5
-
38
-
-
0028806551
-
Why question screening mammography for women in their forties?
-
Fletcher SW. Why question screening mammography for women in their forties? Radiol Clin N Am 1995;33:1259-72.
-
(1995)
Radiol Clin N Am
, vol.33
, pp. 1259-1272
-
-
Fletcher, S.W.1
-
39
-
-
0031315806
-
Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age
-
Harris R. Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:139-45.
-
(1997)
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.22
, pp. 139-145
-
-
Harris, R.1
-
40
-
-
0031322938
-
Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: A dilemma
-
Ernster VL, Barclay J. Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:151-56.
-
(1997)
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.22
, pp. 151-156
-
-
Ernster, V.L.1
Barclay, J.2
-
41
-
-
0033874338
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ: Implications for screening mammography
-
Feig SA. Ductal carcinoma in situ: implications for screening mammography. Radiol Clin N Am 2000;38:653-58.
-
(2000)
Radiol Clin N Am
, vol.38
, pp. 653-658
-
-
Feig, S.A.1
-
42
-
-
0031771606
-
How to prevent invasive breast cancer. Detect and excise duct carcinoma in situ
-
Cady B. How to prevent invasive breast cancer. Detect and excise duct carcinoma in situ. J Surg Oncol 1998;69:60-62.
-
(1998)
J Surg Oncol
, vol.69
, pp. 60-62
-
-
Cady, B.1
-
43
-
-
0042366192
-
Quantifying the potential problem of over-diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening
-
Yen M-F, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen H-H, Duffy SW. Quantifying the potential problem of over-diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1746-54.
-
(2003)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.39
, pp. 1746-1754
-
-
Yen, M.-F.1
Tabar, L.2
Smith, R.A.3
Chen, H.-H.4
Duffy, S.W.5
-
44
-
-
0141617565
-
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs
-
Elmore JG, Nakano CT, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D'Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1384-93.
-
(2003)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.95
, pp. 1384-1393
-
-
Elmore, J.G.1
Nakano, C.T.2
Koepsell, T.D.3
Desnick, L.M.4
D'Orsi, C.J.5
Ransohoff, D.F.6
-
45
-
-
0142119238
-
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom
-
Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003;290:2129-37.
-
(2003)
JAMA
, vol.290
, pp. 2129-2137
-
-
Smith-Bindman, R.1
Chu, P.W.2
Miglioretti, D.L.3
-
46
-
-
2142812303
-
Optimal recall rates following mammography
-
Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske KP. Optimal recall rates following mammography [letter]. JAMA 2004;291:821-22.
-
(2004)
JAMA
, vol.291
, pp. 821-822
-
-
Smith-Bindman, R.1
Kerlikowske, K.P.2
-
47
-
-
10744232916
-
Breast cancer survival in Europe and the United States: A population-based study
-
Sant M, Allemani G, Berrino F, et al. Breast cancer survival in Europe and the United States: a population-based study. Cancer 2004;100:715-22.
-
(2004)
Cancer
, vol.100
, pp. 715-722
-
-
Sant, M.1
Allemani, G.2
Berrino, F.3
-
48
-
-
0038715898
-
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003
-
Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-69.
-
(2003)
CA Cancer J Clin
, vol.53
, pp. 141-169
-
-
Smith, R.A.1
Saslow, D.2
Sawyer, K.A.3
|