Determinants of within-patch microdistribution and movements of endangered butterfly Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)

Hacquetia

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 115-128

  Čelik, Tatjana ^a   Vreš, Branko ^a   Seliškar, Andrej ^a  

^a Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Coenonympha oedippus; Ljubljansko barje; Mark release recapture; microdistribution of adults; vegetation structure; within patch movements

Indexed keywords

COENONYMPHA OEDIPPUS; NYMPHALIDAE; POTENTILLA; POTENTILLA ERECTA; SATYRINAE;

EID: 78751598586     PISSN: 15814661     EISSN: 18549829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10028-009-0007-x     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abadijev, S.P. 2001: An Atlas of the Distribution of the Butterflies in Bulgaria (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea). Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, 335 pp.
2. Aistleitner, U., Mayr, T. & Siegel, C. 2006: Nachweise von neuen, verschollenen un stark gefährdeten Grossschmetterlingen aus Vorarlberg, Austria occ. (Lepidoptera). Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft österreichischer Entomologen, 58: 1-10.
3. Anthes, N., Fartmann, T., Hermann, G. & Kaule, G. 2003: Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure - the key for successful management of pre-alpine euphydryas aurinia colonies. Journal of Insect Conservation, 7: 175-185. (Pubitemid 38033764)
4. Auckland, J.N., Debinski, D.M. & Clark, W.R. 2004: Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius. Ecological Entomology, 29: 139-149. (Pubitemid 38527323)
5. Baguette, M., Vansteenwegen, C., Convi, I. & Neve, G. 1998: Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecologica, 19: 17-24. (Pubitemid 28202533)
6. Balleto, E., Bonelli S. & Cassulo L. 2005: Mapping the Italian Butterfly Diversity for Conservation. In: Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. & Settele, J. (eds.): Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, pp. 71-76.
7. Balleto, E. & Kudrna, O. 1985: Some Aspects of the Conservation of Butterflies in Italy, with Recommendations for a future Strategy (Lepidoptera Hesperiidae & Papilionoidea). Bolletino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 117: 39-59.
8. Bozano, G.C. 2002: Guide to the butterflies of the Palearctic region. Satyrinae part III. Omnes Artes, Milano, 71 pp.
9. Brakefield, P.M. 1982: Ecological studies on the butterfly maniola jurtina in Britain. I. Adult behaviour, microdistrbution and dispersal. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51: 713-726.
10. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964: Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetations Kunde. 3. Auflage. Springer, Wien-New York, 865 pp.
11. Brommer, J.E. & Fred, M.S. 1999: Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecological Entomology, 24: 125-131.
12. Brown, I.L. & Ehrlich, P.R. 1980: Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly, euphydras chalcedona. Structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Oecologia, 47: 239-251.
13. Buszko, J. 2005: Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787). In Polska Czerwona Ksiȩga Zwierza̧t - Bezkrȩgowce, http://www.iop.krakow.pl/pckz/opis.asp?id=99&je=pl (31.5.2005)
14. Chew, F.S. & Robbins, R.K. 1989: Egg-laying in Butterflies. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P. R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 65-79.
15. Chrétien, M.P. 1886: Une note sur les premiers ćtats du Coenonympha oedippus. In: Bourgeois, M.J. (ed.): Séance du 13 octobre 1886 (Bulletin entomologique). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 6: 638 (157).
16. th Edition.
17. Čelik, T. 1997: Ecological researches of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. Msc Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 67 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
18. Čelik, T. 2003: Population structure, migration and conservation of Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) in a fragmented landscape. PhD Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 100 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
19. Čelik, T. 2004: Population dynamics of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. Acta Entomologica Slovenica, 12: 99-114.
20. Čelik, T., Verovnik, R., Gomboc, S. & Lasan, M. 2005: Natura 2000 in Slovenia: Lepidoptera. Založba ZRC SAZU, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, 288 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
21. Dennis, L.H.R. 2004: Just how important are structural elements as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8: 37-45.
22. Dierks, K. 2006: Beobachtungen zur Larvalbiologie von Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) im Südwesten Frankreichs (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Entomologische Zeitschrift, 116 (4): 186-188.
23. Drouet, E. 1989: La situation de Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius dans le département de l'Isère (Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Satyrinae). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, 58: 345-349.
24. Ehrlich, P.R. 1989: The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 25-40.
25. Elligsen, H., Beinlich B. & Plachter, H. 1997: Effects of large-scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Journal of Insect Conservation, 1: 13-23.
26. ESRI, 1999-2006: Arc GIS 9, ArcMap version 9.2. ESRI Inc.
27. Fischer, K., Beinlich, B. & Plachter, H. 1999: Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 3: 43-52.
28. Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjörgen-Gulve, P., Boggs, C.L. & Murphy, D.D. 2002: Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology, 16: 1-11.
29. Fowler, J. & Cohen, L. 1992: Practical statistics for field biology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 227 pp.
30. Gibbs, M., Lace, L.A., Jones, M.J. & Moore, A.J. 2004: Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: Effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. Journal of Insect Science, 4: 16, 6 pp.
31. Gorbunov, P. 2001: The butterflies of Russia: classification, genitalia, keys for identification (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea). Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Publishers Thesis, Ekaterinburg, 320 pp.
32. Gutiérrez, D., Thomas, C.D. & Cortes-Leon, J.L. 1999: Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (erynnis tages). Oecologia, 121: 506-517.
33. Habeler, H. 1972: Zur Kenntnis der Lebensräume von Coenonympha oedippus F. (Lep. Satyridae). Nachr. Bayer. Ent. 21, 3: 51-54.
34. Hafner, J. 1910: Makrolepidopteren von Görz und Umgebung. Entomologischen Zeitschrift, XXIV Jahrgang, Sonder-Abdruck: 1-40.
35. Heath, J. 1981: Threatened Rhopalocera (Butterflies) in Europe. European Committee for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Council of Europe, 157 pp.
36. Ide, J. 2002: Mating behaviour and light conditions cause seasonal changes in the dispersal pattern of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana. Ecological Entomology, 27: 33-40. (Pubitemid 34227899)
37. Ims, R.A. & Hjermann, D.Ø. 2001: Condition-dependent dispersal. In: Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A.A. & Nichols, J.D. (eds.): Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 203-216.
38. Ims, R.A. & Yaccoz, G.N. 1997: Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations. Emigration, Migration and Colonization. In: Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M.E. (eds.): Metapopulation biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 247-265.
39. Kaligarič, M., 1997: Rastlinstvo Primorskega krasa in Slovenske Istre. Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko: Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Republike Slovenije, Koper, 111 pp.
40. Kolar, H. 1919: Über das Vorkommen von Coenonympha oedippus F. Zeitschrift der öster reichischen Entomologen-Vereines, Wien, 4. Jahrgang: 96.
41. Kolar, H. 1929: Verbreitung von Coenonympha oedippus F. in Europa. Verhandlugen des zoologisch-botanischen Vereins in Wien, Jahr 1928, Band 78: 105-108.
42. Konvicka, M., Hula, V. & Fric, Z. 2003: Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly euphydras aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and structure? European Journal of Entomology, 100: 313-322.
43. Krauss, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Müller, C.B. & Tscharntke, T. 2005: Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of monophagous butterfly. Ecography, 28: 465-474. (Pubitemid 41080437)
44. Kučinić, M., Tvrtković, N. & Kletečki, E. 1999: The False Ringelt (Coenonympha oedippus F.) is a member of the Croatian butterfly fauna after all. Natura Croatica, 8: 399-405.
45. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski I. 1996: An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly melitaea cinxia. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 791-801.
46. Lafranchis, J. 2004: Fische Insectes protégés. Le Fadet des laîches. Insectes, 133: 21-22.
47. Lafranchis, T. 2000: Les Papillions de jour de France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles. Collection Parthenope, editions Biotope, Meze, 448 pp.
48. Lhonore, J. 1996: Coenonympha oedippus. Nature and environment, 79: 98-104.
49. Lhonore, J. 1998: Biologie, écologie et répartition de quatre espèces de Lépidoptères Rhopalocères protégés (Lycaenidae, Satyridae) dans l'Ouest de la France. Rapport d'études de l'OPIE, vol. 2, http://www.inra.fr/opie-insectes/re- rhopa.htm 27-09-2000.
50. Lhonore, J. & Lagarde, M. 1999: Biogeographie, ecologie et protection de Coenonympha oedippus (Fab., 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 35 (suppl.): 299-307.
51. Loertscher, M., Erhardt, A. & Zettel, J. 1995: Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaiclike habitat: The role of nectar sources. Ecography, 18: 15-26.
52. Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Rita, H., Salminen, J. & von Bonsdorff, T. 2001: Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a lanscape ecological approach. Ecography, 24: 601-617. (Pubitemid 33072916)
53. Manly, B.F.J. 1971: Estimates of a Marking Effect with Capture-Recapture Sampling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 8: 181-189.
54. Martinčič, A., Wraber, T., Jogan, N., Podobnik, A., Turk, B., Vreš, B., Ravnik, V., Frajman, B., Strgulc Krajšek, S., Trčak, B., Bačič, T., Fischer, M. A., Eler, K. & Surina, B. 2007: Mala flora Slovenije. Ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk. Četrta, dopolnjena in spremenjena izdaja. Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana, 967 pp.
55. Matter, S.F. & Roland, J. 2002: An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecological Entomology, 27: 308-316. (Pubitemid 34536054)
56. Matter, S.F., Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N. & Sabourin, K. 2003: The effects of isolation, habitat area, and resources on the abundance, density, and movements of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. American Midland Naturalist, 150: 26-36. (Pubitemid 36844653)
57. Morton, A.C. 1989: The Effects of Marking and Handling on Recapture Frequencies of Butterflies. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 55-58.
58. Oberdorfer, E. 1978: Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften II, 2. Aufl., Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 355 pp.
59. Oberdorfer, E. (ed.) 1983: Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften III, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York, 455 pp.
60. Pastoralis, G. & Reiprich, A. 1995: Zoznam Motylov vyskytujucich sa na uzemi Slovenska. Spišska Nova Ves, Komarno, 52 pp.
61. Pollard, E. & Yates, T. J. 1993: Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London, 274 pp.
62. Ravenscroft, N.O.M. 1994: The ecology of the chequered butterfly Carterocephalus palaemon in Scotland. Microhabitat. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31: 613-622.
63. Sajovic, G. 1910: Naravoslovni oddelek, Zoologična zbirka: brezvretenčarji. In: Mantuani, J. (ed.): Poročilo o deželnem muzeju »Rudolfinum « za l. 1909. Carniola, Nova vrsta, Muzejsko društvo za Kranjsko, Ljubljana, L. I., Zvezek 1: 39-40.
64. SBN (Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz), 1987: Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, Basel, 516 pp.
65. Schneider, C. 2003: The influence of spatil scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecological Entomology, 28: 252-256. (Pubitemid 36463423)
66. Schneider, C., Dover, J. & Fry, G.L.A. 2003: Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecological Entomology, 28: 219-227.
67. Schwarzwälder, B., Lörtscher, M., Erhardt, A. & Zettel, J. 1997: Habitat utilization by the Heath Fritillary butterfly, mellicta athalia ssp. celadussa (Rott.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in montane grasslands of different management. Biological Conservation, 82: 157-165.
68. Scott, J.A. 1975: Flight patterns among eleven species of diurnal Lepidoptera. Ecology, 56: 1367-1377.
69. Seliškar, T., Vreš, B., Seliškar, A. 2003: FloVegSi 2.0. Računalniški program za urejanje in analizo bioloških podatkov. Biološki inštitut ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana.
70. Singer, M.C. 1989: Butterfly-Hostplant Relationships: Host Quality, Adult Choice and Larval Success. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 81-88.
71. SPSS Inc., 1989-2004: SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Release 13.0 (1 Sept 2004).
72. Staub, R. & Aistleitner, U. 2006: Das Moor-Wiesenvögelschen - oder worauf es im grenzüberschreitenden Artenschutz ankommt. In: Broggi, M.F. (ed.): Alpenrheintal - eine Region im Umbau. Analysen und Perspektiven der räumlichen Entwicklung. Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesselschaft, pp. 245-254.
73. Tabashnik, B.E. 1980: Population Structure of Pierid Butterflies. III. Pest Populations of Colias eriphyle. Oecologia, 47: 175-183.
74. Tregubov, V. 1957: Gozdne rastlinske združbe. In: Inštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvo Slovenije (ed.): Prebiralni gozdovi na Snežniku. Vegetacijska in gozdnogospodarska monografija. Kmečka knjiga, Ljubljana, pp. 23-63.
75. Trpin, D. & Vreš, B. 1995: Register flore Slovenije. Praprotnice in cvetnice. (Register of the Flora of Slovenia. Ferns and Vascular Plants). Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU, Zbirka 7, Ljubljana, 153 pp.
76. Tshikolovets, V. V. 2003: Butterflies of Eastern Europe, Urals and Caucasus. Brno, 176 pp.
77. Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb D., A. (Eds.) 1980: Flora Europaea, Volume 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 452 pp.
78. Välimäki, P. & Itämies, J. 2003: Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats - effects of patch characteristics. Ecography, 26: 679-691.
79. van Halder, I., Barbaro, L., Corcket E. & Jactel H. 2008: Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17:1149-1169.
80. van Sway, C.A.M. & Warren, M.S. 1999: Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment, 99: 1-260.
81. Vozar, A., Örvössy, N., Kocsis, M., Korösi, A. & Peregovits, L. 2005: First results of a study on Coenonympha oedippus in Hungary. In: Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. & Settele, J. (eds.): Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol.1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, pp. 120.
82. Weidemann, H. J. 1995: Tagfalter: beobachten, bestimmen. 2., völlig neu bearb. Aufl. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, 659 pp.
83. White, G. 2008: Program maRK. Version 5.1 (http//www.cnr.colostate.edu/ ~gwhite).
84. Wiklund, C. 2003: Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating systems. In: Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B. & Ehrlich, P.R. (eds.): Butterflies. Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 67-90.
85. Winiarska, G. 2001: Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) in Narew National Park. Fragmenta faunistica, 44: 73-78. (Pubitemid 33321442)