Terrain classification based on structure for autonomous navigation in complex environments

ICCE 2010 - 3rd International Conference on Communications and Electronics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 163-168

  Nguyen, Duong V ^a   Kuhnert, Lars ^a   Schlemper, Jens ^a   Kuhnert, Klaus Dieter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Image classification; NDVIE feature; Outdoor navigation

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; GRAPH-CUT TECHNIQUES; HOMOGENEOUS REGIONS; LOCAL PROPERTY; NDVIE FEATURE; NEW APPROACHES; OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT; OUTDOOR NAVIGATION; POINT CLOUD; POINT DENSITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TERRAIN CLASSIFICATION; VEHICLE NAVIGATION;

AUTOMOBILE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; DECISION MAKING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LANDFORMS; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; OPTICAL RADAR; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 78751526940     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCE.2010.5670703     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. David Bradley, Ranjith Unnikrishnan, and J. Andrew (Drew) Bagnell, Vegetation Detection for Driving in Complex Environments, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April, 2007.
2. Matthias Plaue, Analysis of the PMD Imaging System, Technical Report, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
3. Duong V.Nguyen, Lars Kuhnert, Markus Ax, and Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert, Combining distance and modulation information for detecting pedestrians in outdoor environment using a PMD camera, Proc. on the 11th IASTED International Conference Computer Graphics and Imaging, Innsbruck, Austria, Feb-2010.
4. John Tuley, Nicolas Vandapel, and Martial Hebert, Technical report CMU-RI-TR-04-44, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, August, 2004.
5. J. F. Lalonde, N. Vandapel, D. F. Huber, M. Hebert, Natural Terrain Classification using Three-Dimensional Ladar Data for Ground Robot Mobility, Journal of Field Robotics, Volume 23 Issue 10, Pages 839-861, Oct-2006.
6. Pedro F. Felzenszwalb, Daniel P. Huttenlocher , Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation, IJCV, Volume 59 Issue 2, Sept-2004.
7. R. Willstatter and A. Stoll, Utersuchungenuber Chlorophyll, Berlin: Springer, 1913.
8. Anguelov, D., Taskar, B., Chatalashev, V., Koller, D., Gupta, D., Heitz, G. Ng, A.,Discriminative Learning of Markov Random Fields for Segmentation of 3D Scan Data, ICVPR, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.
9. Huang, J., Lee, A. Mumford, D. Statistics of Range Images, ICVPR, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2000.
10. Rasmussen, C., Combining Laser Range, Color and Texture Cues for Autonomous Road Following, ICRA, Washington, DC, USA.
11. N. Vandapel and M. Herbert, Natural terrain classification using 3-d ladar data, in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2004.
12. C. Cortes, V. Vapnik, Support vector networks. Machine Learning, vol. 20, p. 273-297, 1995.
13. Quinlan, J. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA.
14. Guoqiang Peter Zhang, Neural Networks for Classification: A Survey, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 30, No. 4, Nov-2000.
15. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, no. 55. 1997.
16. Bilmes, J., A Gentle Tutorial on the EM Algorithm and its Application to Parameter Estimation for Gaussian Mixture and Hidden Markov Models, Berkeley, CA, USA: The International Computer Science Institute, University of Berkeley, Technical Report, 1997.
17. Baudat. G and Anouar. F Kernel-Based Methods and Function Approximation, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, USA, pp. 1244-1249, 2001.