Reconstruction of planar conductivities in subdomains from incomplete data

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3342-3362

  Nachman, Adrian ^a   Tamasan, Alexandru ^b   Timonov, Alexandre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE   (United States)

Author keywords

1 Laplacian; Conductivity imaging; Current density impedance imaging; Minimal surfaces

Indexed keywords

1-LAPLACIAN; BOUNDARY POINTS; COMPUTATIONAL FEASIBILITY; CONDUCTIVITY IMAGING; CONFORMAL METRICS; CURRENT DENSITY IMPEDANCE IMAGING; EQUIPOTENTIAL CURVES; INCOMPLETE DATA; MINIMAL SURFACES; MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL STUDIES; SUB-DOMAINS; SUBDOMAIN; SUBINTERVALS; TWO POINT BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; TWO-DIMENSION; VOLTAGE POTENTIALS;

CURRENT DENSITY; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 78751485092     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/10079241X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. G. ALESSANDRINI, An identification problem for an elliptic equation in two variables, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 145 (1986), pp. 265-295.
2. H. AMMARI, Y. CAPDEBOSCQ, H. KANG, AND A. KOZHEMIAK, Mathematical models and reconstruction methods in magneto-acoustic imaging, European J. Appl. Math., 20 (2009), pp. 303-317.
3. H. AMMARI, E. BONNETIER, Y. CAPDEBOSCQ, M. TANTER, AND M. FINK, Electrical impedance tomography by elastic deformation, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (2008), pp. 1557-1573.
4. H. AMMARI AND H. KANG, Multi-scale and multi-physics biomedical imaging modalities, in Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, O. Scherzer, ed., Springer, New York, to appear.
5. P. M. ANSELON AND P. J. LAURENT, A general method for construction of interpolating and smoothing spline-functions, Numer. Math., 12 (1968), pp. 66-191.
6. G. BAL AND J. C. SCHOTLAND, Inverse scattering and acousto-optic imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104 (2010), 043902.
7. C. DE BOOR, Bicubic spline interpolation, J. Math. and Phys., 41 (1962), pp. 212-218.
8. E. BOMBIERI, E. DE GIORGI, AND E. GIUSTI, Minimal cones and the Bernstein problem, Invent. Math., 7 (1969), pp. 243-268.
9. D. ISAACSON AND M. CHENEY, Effects of measurement precision and finite numbers of electrodes on linear impedance imaging algorithms, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 51 (1991), pp. 1705-1731.
10. B. GEBAUER AND O. SCHERZER, Impedance-acoustic tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 69 (2008), pp. 565-576.
11. D. GILBARG AND N. S. TRUDINGER, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed., Springer- Verlag, New York, 2001.
12. H. FEDERER, Curvature measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 62 (1959), pp. 418-491.
13. M. J. JOY, A. I. NACHMAN, K. F. HASANOV, R. S. YOON, AND A. W. MA, A new approach to current density impedance imaging (CDII), in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), Kyoto, Japan, 2004, CD-ROM, abstract no. 356.
14. S. KIM, O. KWON, J. K. SEO, AND J.-R. YOON, On a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 34 (2002), pp. 511-526.
15. O. KWON, E. J. WOO, J. R. YOON, AND J. K. SEO, Magnetic resonance electric impedance tomography (MREIT): Simulation study of J-substitution algorithm, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 49 (2002), pp. 160-167.
16. O. KWON, J. Y. LEE, AND J. R. YOON, Equipotential line method for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 18 (2002), pp. 1089-1100.
17. J. M. LEE, Riemannian Manifolds, Springer, New York, 1997.
18. J. Y. LEE, A reconstruction formula and uniqueness of conductivity in MREIT using two internal current distributions, Inverse Problems, 20 (2004), pp. 847-858.
19. J. J. LIU, J. K. SEO, M. SINI, AND E. J. WOO, On the conductivity imaging by MREIT: Available resolution and noisy effect, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 73 (2007), paper 012013.
20. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 67 (2007), pp. 1259-1282.
21. Q. MA AND B. HE, Investigation on magnetoacoustic signal generation with magnetic induction and application to electrical conductivity reconstruction, Phys. Med. Biol., 52 (2007), pp. 5085-5099.
22. N. MANDACHE, Exponential instability in an inverse problem for the Schrödinger equation, Inverse Problems, 17 (2001), pp. 1435-1444.
23. A. NACHMAN, A. TAMASAN, AND A. TIMONOV, Conductivity imaging with a single measurement of boundary and interior data, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), pp. 2551-2563.
24. A. NACHMAN, A. TAMASAN, AND A. TIMONOV, Recovering the conductivity from a single measurement of interior data, Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), article 035014.
25. M. Z. NASHED AND A. TAMASAN, Structural stability in a minimization problem and applications to conductivity imaging, Inverse Probl. Imaging, to appear.
26. A. A. SAMARSKII, The Theory of Difference Schemes, Marcell Decker, New York, 2001.
27. G. C. SCOTT, M. L. JOY, R. L. ARMSTRONG, AND R. M. HENKELMAN, Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 10 (1991), pp. 362-374.
28. E. J. WOO AND J. K. SEO, Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high resolution conductivity imaging, Physiol. Meas., 29 (2008), pp. R1-R26.
29. X. LI, Y. XU, AND B. HE, Imaging electrical impedance from acoustic measurements by means of magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI), IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 54 (2007), pp. 323-330.
30. N. ZHANG, Electrical Impedance Tomography Based on Current Density Imaging, M.Sc. thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1992.
31. W. P. ZIEMER, Weakly Differentiable Functions, Springer, New York, 1069.