Paraphilias and predators: The ethical application of psychiatric diagnoses in partisan sexually violent predator civil commitment proceedings

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 82-98

  Fabian, John Matthew ^a  

^a Clinical Psychologist and Fellowship Trained Clinical Neuropsychologist   (United States)

Author keywords

Civil commitment; Dsm iv tr; Forensic bias; Forensic identification; Forensic ideology; Hebephilia; Paraphilia; Professional ethics; Psychiatric diagnosis; Sexually violent predator

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COURT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; HUMAN; IDEOLOGY; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; SEXUAL CRIME; SEXUAL DEVIATION; SYMPTOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78751476763     PISSN: 15228932     EISSN: 15229092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2011.521723     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Dangerous sex offenders. (1999). Washington DC: Author.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington DC: Author.
4. Brodsky, S. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Campbell, T. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Pitfalls and problems. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Ltd.
6. Campbell, T. (2006). The validity of Psychopathy Checklist Revised in adversarial proceedings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(4), 43-53.
7. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law & Human Behavior, 15(6), 655-665.
8. Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Fabian, J. (2005). The risky business of conducting risk assessments for those already civilly committed as sexually violent predators. William Mitchell School of Law, 32(1), 81-159.
10. First, M., & Halon, R. (2008). Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry & Law, 36(4), 443-454.
11. Greenberg, S., Shuman, D., & Meyer, R. (2004). Unmasking forensic diagnosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 1-15.
12. Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
13. Gutheil, T., Hauser, M., White, M., Spruiell, G., & Strasburger, L. (2003). "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": An ethics dilemma for expert witnesses. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 422-427. In re Young 122 Wash. 2d 1 857(1993).
14. Kafka, M. (1997). Hypersexual desire in males: An operational definition and clinical implications for men with paraphilias and paraphilia-related disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 505-526.
15. Kafka, M., & Hennen, J. (2003). Hypersexual desire in males: Are males with paraphilias different from males with paraphilia-related disorders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 15(4), 307-321.
16. Kansas V. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002).
17. Kansas V. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
18. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4-12.
19. Kingston, D., Kingston, D., Firestone, P., Moulden, H., & Bradford, J. (2007). The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: A comparison of various classifications procedures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 423-436.
20. Knight, R., & Cerce, D. (1999). Validation and revision of the multidimensional assessment of sex and aggression. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 135-161.
21. Knight, R., Prentky, R., & Cerce, D. (1994). The development, reliability, and validity of an inventory for the multidimensional assessment of sex and aggression. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 21, 72-94.
22. Levenson, J. (2004). Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 48(6), 638-648.
23. Levenson, J., & Morin, J. (2006). Factors predicting selection of sexually violent predators. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 50(6), 609-629.
24. Malamuth, N., Knight, R., & Prentky, R. (1995). A unified developmental theory of sexual aggression: Models in the making. Paper presented at The Fourteenth Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, October 11-14, 1995, New Orleans, LA.
25. Marshall, W. (2007). Diagnostic issues, multiple paraphilias, and comorbid disorders in sexual offenders: Their incidence and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 16-35.
26. Marshall, W., Kennedy, P., Yates, P., & Serran, G. (2002). Diagnosing sexual sadism in sexual offenders: Reliability across diagnosticians. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 668-677.
27. McConaghy, N. (1999). Unresolved issues in scientific sexology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 285-318.
28. Melton, G., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Meriam Webster. Retrieved from http://www.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/dysfunction.
30. Morse, S. (1978). Law and mental health professionals: The limits of expertise. Professional Psychology, 9(3), 389-399.
31. Moser, C. (2002). Are any of the paraphilias in the DSM mental disorders? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 490-491.
32. Murrie, D., & Balusek, K. (2007). Forensic assessment of violence risk in adversarial proceedings: Pursuing objectivity and avoiding bias. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7(4), 141-153.
33. Murrie, D., Boccaccini, M., Johnson, J., & Janke, C. (2008). Does interrater (Dis)agreement on psychopathy checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? Law and Human Behavior 32(4), 352-362.
34. Murrie, D., Boccaccini, M., Turner, D., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (Dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(1), 19-53.
35. O'Donahue, W., Regev, L, & Hagstrom, A. (2000). Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 12, 95-105.
36. Otto, R. (1989). Bias and expert testimony of mental health professionals in adversarial proceedings: A preliminary investigation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7(2), 267-273.
37. Packard, R., & Levenson, J. (2006). Revisiting the reliability of diagnostic decisions in sex offender civil commitment. Sexual-Offender-Treatment, 3(6). Available at www.sexualoffender-treatment.org/50.html
38. Prentky, A., Janus, E., Barbaree, H., Schwartz, B., & Kafka, M. (2006). Sexually violent predators in the courtroom: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 357-393.
39. Prentky, R., Coward, A., & Gabriel, A. (2008). Commentary: Muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36(4), 455-458. RCW. 71.09.
40. Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. (2000). Conducting insanity evaluations (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41. Schopp, R., Pearce, M., & Scalora, M. (1998). Expert testimony and sexual predator statutes after Hendricks. Expert Evidence, 6(1), 1-21.
42. Shuman, D. W., & Greenberg, S. A. (2003). The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartially and advocacy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(3), 219-224.
43. Spitzer, R. (1986, July 2). Memo to advisory committee on paraphilias. Washington, DC: APA Library,
44. Wollert, R. (2007). Poor diagnostic reliability, the Null-Bayes Logic Model, and their implications for sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Vol. 13(3), 167-203.
45. Zander, T. (2005). Civil commitment without psychosis: The law's reliance on the weakest links in psychodiagonsis. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law, 1, 17-82.
46. Zander, T. (2008). Adult sexual attraction to early-stage adolescents: Phallometry doesn't equal pathology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3), 329-330.
47. Zusman, J., & Simon, J. (1983). Differences in repeated psychiatric examinations of litigants to a lawsuit. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1300-1304.