POOR DIAGNOSTIC RELIABILITY, THE NULL-BAYES LOGIC MODEL, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR EVALUATIONS

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 167-203

  Wollert, Richard ^a  

^a Independent Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes's Theorem; diagnostic reliability; DSM IV TR; Null Bayes Logic Model; sexually violent predator evaluations

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049099999     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.13.3.167     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Abracen J., and Looman J. Evaluation of civil commitment criteria in a high risk sample of sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment 1 (2006) 124-139
2. Aldhous P. Sex offenders: Throwing away the key. New Scientist 2592 (2007, February 24) 6-9
3. Amenta A.E., Guy L., and Edens J. Sex offender risk assessment: A cautionary note regarding measures attempting to quantify risk. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 3 1 (2003) 39-50
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed., revised (1987), Author, Washington, DC
5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders options book (1991), Author, Washington, DC
6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., draft criteria) (1993), Author, Washington, DC
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. (1994), Author, Washington, DC
8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision (2000), Author, Washington, DC
9. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct [PDF format] (2002). http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html Retrieved February 8, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
10. Barbaree H.E., Seto M., Langton C., and Peacock E. Evaluating the accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (2001) 490-521
11. Bartosh D.L., Garby T., Lewis D., and Gray S. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47 4 (2003) 422-438
12. Bayes T. An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 53 (1764) 370-418
13. Beech A.R., Fisher D., and Thornton D. Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34 (2003) 339-352
14. Biggerstaff B.J. Comparing diagnostic tests: A simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Statistics in Medicine 19 (2000) 649-663
15. Boer D.P., Wilson R., Gauthier C., and Hart S. Assessing risk for sexual violence. In: Webster C.D., and Jackson M.A. (Eds). Impulsivity: Theory, assessment, and treatment (1997), Guilford, New York 326-342
16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1960) 37-46
17. Covington J.R. Preventive detention for sex offenders. Illinois Bar Journal 85 (1997) 493-498
18. Craig L.A., Browne K., and Stringer I. Risk scales and factors predictive of sexual offence recidivism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 4 (2003) 45-69
19. Cronbach L.J. Essentials of psychological testing (1970), Harper & Row, New York
20. Davey M., and Goodenough A. Doubts rise as states hold sex offenders after prison. The New York Times (2007, March 4) 1 18-19
21. Dawid A.P. Bayes's Theorem and weighing evidence by juries. In: Swinburne R. (Ed). Proceedings of the British Academy: Vol. 113. Bayes's Theorem (2002), Oxford University Press, London, England 71-90
22. Dean C. When questions of science come to the courtroom, truth has many faces. The New York Times (2006, December 5). http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/05/science/05law.html?n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20TOP Retrieved December 7, 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/05/science/05law.html?n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20TOP
23. de Finetti B. Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources. In: Kyburg H.E., and Smokler H. (Eds). Studies in subjective probability (1964), Wiley, New York 91-158
24. Denis D.J. Inferring the alternative hypothesis: Risky business. Theory & Science 1 (2001). http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol002.001/03denis.html Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol002.001/03denis.html
25. Dix G.E. Differential processing of abnormal sex offenders: Utilization of California's mentally disordered sex offender program. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 67 (1976) 233-243
26. Donaldson, T., & Wollert, R. (in press). A mathematical proof and example that Bayes's Theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
27. Doren D.M. Evaluating sex offenders (2002), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
28. Doren D. Stability of the interpretative risk percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99. Sexual Abuse 16 (2004) 25-36
29. Epperson D., Kaul J., Huot S., Goldman R., and Alexander W. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool--Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores (2003, December). http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~dle/mnsost_download.htm Retrieved February 18, 2007, from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~dle/mnsost_download.htm
30. Fagan T.J. Nomogram for Bayes's Theorem. New England Journal of Medicine 293 5 (1975) 257
31. Fauman M.A. Study guide to DSM-IV-R (2002), American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC
32. Fienberg S.E. When did Bayesian inference become "Bayesian.". Bayesian Analysis 1 1 (2006) 1-40
33. First M.B. Deposition in re the detention of William Davenport, Volume I. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Franklin, Case number 99-2-50349-2 (2006, December 11)
34. First, M. B., & Halon, R. (in press). Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law
35. Fisher R.A. The arrangement of field experiments. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain 33 (1926) 503-513
36. Frances A., and Ross M. DSM-IV-TR case studies (2001), American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC
37. Fuller A.K., Fuller A.E., and Blashfield R.K. Paraphilic coercive disorder. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy 16 (1990) 164-171
38. Graham J.R. The MMPI: A practical guide (1977), Oxford University Press, New York
39. Grove W.M., and Meehl P. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2 2 (1996) 293-323
40. Grove W.M., Zald D., Lebow B., Snitz B., and Nelson C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 12 (2000) 19-30
41. Hall G.C.N. Criminal behavior as a function of clinical and actuarial variables in a sex offender population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56 (1988) 773-775
42. Hanson R.K. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?. Sexual Abuse 18 (2006) 343-355
43. Hanson R.K., and Morton-Bourgon K. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (2007), Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, Ottawa, Canada
44. Hanson R.K., and Thornton D. Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior 24 (2000) 119-136
45. Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). STATIC-99 coding rules revised-2003. Unpublished manuscript, Solicitor General of Canada at Ottawa.
46. Harris G.T., Rice M., Quinsey V., Lalumiere M., Boer D., and Lang C. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 15 3 (2003) 413-425
47. Jackson R.L., Rogers R., and Shuman D. The adequacy and accuracy of sexually violent predator evaluations: Contextualized risk assessment in clinical practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 3 (2004) 115-129
48. Janus E. Sexual predator commitment laws: Lessons for law and the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 18 (2000) 5-21
49. Janus E.S. Sex offender commitments and the "inability to control": Developing legal standards and a behavioral vocabulary for an elusive concept. In: Schlank A., and Cohen F. (Eds). The sexual predator II (2001), Civic Research Institute, Kingston, NJ 1-30
50. Janus E.S., and Meehl P.E. Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3 (1997) 33-64
51. Jaynes E.T., and Bretthorst G. Probability theory: The logic of science (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York
52. Jeffreys H. The theory of probability (1939), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
53. Johnson B., and Christensen L. Educational research (2004), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
54. Johnson R.A., and Bhattacharyya G. Statistics: Principles and methods (1996), Wiley, New York
55. Kadane J.B. Comment: Codifying chance. Statistical Science 5 1 (1990) 18-20
56. Kahn T.J., and Chambers H. Assessing reoffense risk with juvenile sex offenders. Child Welfare 70 (1991) 333-345
57. Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002)
58. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1996)
59. Kent S. Sherman Kent and the Board of National Estimates: Collected essays (1994), Center for the Study of Intelligence, Washington, DC
60. Kidder L.H., and Judd C. Research methods in social relations (1986), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York
61. Langton C.M., Barbaree H., Seto M., Peacock E., Harkins L., and Hansen K. Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffense among adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34 (2007) 37-59
62. Lanyon R.I. Psychological assessment procedures in sex offending. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 3 (2001) 253-260
63. Levenson J.S. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2004) 357-369
64. Levenson J.S. Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released groups. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48 (2004) 638-648
65. Marshall W.L. Diagnostic problems with sexual offenders. In: Marshall W., Fernandez Y., and Marshall L. (Eds). Sexual offender treatment (2006), Wiley, New York 33-43
66. McCall R.B. Fundamental statistics for psychology (1975), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
67. Mercado C.C., Schopp R., and Bornstein B. Evaluating sex offenders under sexually violent predator laws: How might health professionals conceptualize the notion of volitional impairment?. Aggression and Violent Behavior 10 (2005) 289-309
68. Miller H.A., Amenta A., and Conroy M. Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior 29 (2005) 29-54
69. Monahan J. Mental disorder and violent behavior. American Psychologist 47 (1992) 511-521
70. Morse S.J. Fear of danger, flight from culpability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4 (1998) 250-267
71. Mossman D. Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62 (1994) 783-792
72. Mossman D. Further comments on portraying the accuracy of violence predictions. Law and Human Behavior 18 (1994) 587-593
73. Mossman D. Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse 18 (2006) 41-63
74. Mosteller F., and Youtz C. Quantifying probabilistic expressions. Statistical Science 5 (1990) 2-34
75. Nunes K., Firestone P., Bradford J., Greenberg D., and Broom I. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide. Sexual Abuse 14 3 (2002) 253-269
76. Packard R.L., and Levenson J. Revisiting the reliability of diagnostic decisions in sex offender civil commitment. Sexual Offender Treatment 1 (2006). http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/50.0.html Retrieved December 19, 2006, from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/50.0.html
77. Page J., and Attia J. Using Bayes' nomogram to help interpret odds ratios. Evidence-Based Medicine 8 (2003) 132-134
78. People v. Superior Court, 27 Cal. 4th 888 (2002)
79. Prentky R.A., Janus E., Barbaree H., Schwartz B., and Kafka M. Sexually violent predators in the courtroom: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 357-393
80. Quinsey V.L., Harris G., Rice M., and Cormier C. Violent offenders (1998), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
81. Ramsey F.P. The foundations of mathematics (1931), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
82. Rice M.E., and Harris G. Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 63 (1995) 737-748
83. Roberts C.F., Doren D., and Thornton D. Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior 29 (2002) 569-589
84. Savage L.J. The foundations of statistics (1954), Wiley, New York
85. Schopp R.F. Civil commitment and sexual predators: Competence and condemnation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4 (1998) 323-376
86. Schwartz A. Diagnostic test calculator (2006). http://araw.mede.uic.edu/cgi-bin/testcalc.pl Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://araw.mede.uic.edu/cgi-bin/testcalc.pl
87. Seto M. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment 17 (2005) 156-167
88. Sinclair, L. (Producer). (2000). Sex offender re-offense risk assessment program [videotape]. (Available from Sinclair Seminars, 3630 Lake Mendota Dr., Madison, WI 53705)
89. Sjostedt G., and Langstrom N. Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior 25 6 (2001) 629-645
90. Smith W.R., and Monastersky C. Assessing juvenile sexual offenders' risk for reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior 13 (1986) 115-140
91. Sonis J. How to use and interpret interval likelihood ratios. Family Medicine 31 (1999) 432-437
92. Spitzer R.L. Values and assumptions in the development of DSM-III and DSM-III-R. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 189 (2001) 351-359
93. Spitzer R.L., Gibbon M., Skodol A., Williams J., and First M. Perfect relationship. DSM-IV-TR casebook (1994), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC 171-174
94. Sturgeon V.H., and Taylor J. Report of a five-year follow-up study of mentally disordered sex offenders released from Atascadero State Hospital in 1973. Criminal Justice Journal 4 3 (1980) 31-63
95. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988, June 3) 1285-1293
96. Swets J.A., Dawes R., and Monahan J. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 1 (2000) 1-26
97. Thorndike E.L. A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 4 (1920) 25-29
98. Trowbridge B.C., and Adams J. Sexually violent predator assessment issues. The Trowbridge Foundation Report 8 4/1 (Fall 2006/Winter 2007) 1-15
99. Underwager R., and Wakefield H. A paradigm shift for expert witnesses. Institute for Psychological Therapies Journal 5 (1993) 1-18
100. United States v. Fatico, 458 F. Supp. 388 (E.D. NY 1978).
101. United States v. Schipani, 289 F. Supp. 44 (E.D. NY 1968).
102. Wakefield H., and Underwager R. Assessing violent recidivism in sexual offenders. Issues in Child Abuse Accusations 10 (1998). http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_6.htm Retrieved December 7, 2006, from http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_6.htm
103. Wollert R.W. The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment 2 1 (2002) 87-102
104. Wollert R.W. Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarial tests are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes's Theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 56-85
105. Woodworth G.G. Biostatistics: A Bayesian introduction (2004), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
106. Woodworth G.G., and Kadane J. Expert testimony supporting post-sentence civil incarceration of violent sex offenders. Law, Probability and Risk 3 (2004) 221-241
107. Wright D.B. Causal and associative hypotheses in psychology. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 190-213
108. Zander T. Civil commitment without psychosis: The law's reliance on the weakest links in psychodiagnosis. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment 1 (2005) 17-82