Environmental efficiency of electric power industry of the United States: A data envelopment analysis approach

World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2009, Pages 584-590

  Vaninsky, Alexander Y ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

DEA; Electric power industry; Environmental efficiency; United States

Indexed keywords

BEST VALUE; DEA; ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS; ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRIES; ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC POWER LOSS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; FUEL UTILIZATION; HIGH DEMAND; NON-PARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC POWER MEASUREMENT; ELECTRICITY; FOSSIL FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING;

ELECTRIC LOSSES;

EID: 78651570314     PISSN: 2010376X     EISSN: 20103778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agrell, P, Bogetoft, P. Economic and environmental efficiency of district heating plants. Energy Policy 2005; 33(10):1351-1362
2. Ajodhia, V., Petrov, K. Scarci, G.C. Integrated cost and quality benchmarking in electricity distribution. 2001. Available at http://www.informs.org/Conf/Hawaii2001/TALKS/Sessions.html
3. Amirteimoori, A., Jahanshahloo, G., Kordrostami, S. Ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis: A distance-based approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005; 171 (1): 122-135.
4. Arocena, P. Cost and quality gains from diversification and vertical integration in the electricity industry: A DEA approach. Economics 2008; 30(1): 39-58.
5. Bagdadioglu, N. Privatization, Ownership, and Technical Efficiency in the Turkish Electricity Supply Industry. Pacific and Asian Journal of Energy 1996; 6(1): 25-37.
6. Bagdadioglu, N., Price, C. M. W., Weyman-Jones, T.G. Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energy Economics 1996; 18:1-23.
7. Banker, R. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1984; 17(1): 35-44.
8. Banker R.D., Charnes, Cooper, A. Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 1984; 30(9): 1078-1092.
9. Blose, J., Tankersley, W. Linking dimensions of service quality to organizational outcomes. Managing Service Quality 2004; 14(1): 75-89.
10. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes, E. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis to program follow through. Management Science 1978; 27: 668-697.
11. Chen, T. An assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in, Taiwan's electricity distribution sector. European Journal of Operational Research 2002; 137(2): 421-433.
12. Chen, Y. Ranking efficient units in DEA. Omega 2004; 32 (3): 213-219.
13. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and K. Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References. New York: Springer, 2005.
14. Cote, D. Firm efficiency and ownership structure - The case of U.S. electric utilities using panel data. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 1989; 60(4): 431-450.
15. Delmas, M., Tokat, Y. Deregulation, Governance Structures, And Efficiency: The U.S. Electric Utility Sector. Management Journal 2005; 26 (5): 441-460.
16. Domah, P. Technical efficiency in electricity generation - the impact of smallness and isolation of island economies. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. 2002.
17. Electric Power Annual 2006. Energy Information Administration 2007. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html
18. Farrell M.J. The Measurement of Production Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1957; 120(3): 253-282.
19. Fuh-Hwa F., Hao H. Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Computers & Operations Research 2008; 35(5):1624-1637.
20. Golany, B., Roll, Y. Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1994; 41(3): 291-301.
21. Hjalmarsson, L., A. Veiderpass. Efficiency and ownership in Swedish electricity retail distribution. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1992; 3: 7-23.
22. Honma, S., Hu, J-L. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy 2008; 36:821-833.
23. Jahanshahloo, G., Lotfi, F., Rezai, H., Balf, F. Using Monte Carlo method for ranking efficient DMUs. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005; 162 (1): 371-379.
24. Key World Energy Statistics. International Energy Agency, 2007. Available at http://iea.data.org.
25. Khodabakhshi, M. A super-efficiency model based on improved outputs in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2007;184 (2): 695-703.
26. Korhonen, P., Syrjanen, M. Evaluation of cost efficiency in Finnish electricity distribution. Annals of Operations Research 2003; 121 (1-4); 105-122.
27. Lam, P., Shiu, A. Efficiency and Productivity of China's Thermal Power Generation. Review of Industrial Organization 2004; 24(1): 73-93.
28. Li, S., Jahanshahloo, G.R., Khodabakhshi, M. A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2007; 184 (2): 638-648.
29. Li, Y., Wang, D. Technology efficiency study on nuclear power and coal power in Guangdong province based on DEA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, (ICONE) 2006; (2006).
30. Liu, Y., Gu, X. Hierarchical data envelopment analysis for assessing black-start plans. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems 2006; 30 (21): 33-38.
31. Majumdar, S., Marcus, A. Do Environmental Regulations Retard Productivity? Evidence from U.S. Electric Utilities. University of Michigan Business School, Working Papers, 1998:1-43.
32. Meimodi, A.E. Efficiency considerations in the electricity supply industry: The case of Iran. 1998. Available at http://www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/WorkingPapers/seed95.pdf.
33. Miliotis, P A. Data envelopment analysis applied to electricity distribution districts. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1992; 43: 549-55.
34. Nakicenovic, N., Wien, TU. World Energy Outlook 2007: CO2 Emissions Pathways Compared to Long-Term CO2 Stabilization Scenarios in the Literature and IPCC AR4. 2007. Available at urlhttp://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2007/CO2_Scenarios.pdf.
35. Nemoto, J., Goto, M. Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities, Journal of Productivity Analysis 2003; 19 (2-3): 191-210.
36. Pacudan, R., de Guzman, E. Impact of energy efficiency policy to productive efficiency of electricity distribution industry in the Philippines. Energy Economics 2002; 24(1): 41-54.
37. Pahwa, A., Xiaoming, F., Lubkemann, D. Performance Evaluation of Electric Distribution Utilities Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2003; 18(1): 400-405.
38. Rungsuriyawiboon, S., Stefanou, S. Dynamic efficiency estimation: An application to U.S. Electric utilities. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2007; 25(2): 226-238.
39. Sanhueza, R., Rudnick, H. Discussion of Performance evaluation of electric distribution, utilities based on data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2003; 18 (3): 1220-1221.
40. Scarsi, G. Local Electricity Distribution in Italy: Comparative Efficiency Analysis and Methodological Cross-Checking. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Papers: 1999.16. 2000. Available at http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/default.htm
41. Sueyoshi, T. Tariff structure of Japanese electric power companies: An empirical analysis using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 1999; 118(2); 350-374.
42. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M. Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance, measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in, 1984-1993. European Journal of Operational Research 2001; 133 (2): 232-259.
43. Tahvanainen, K., Viljainen, S., Honkapuro, S., Lassila, J., Partanen, J., Järventausta, P., Kivikko, K., Mäkinen, A. Quality regulation in electricity distribution business. 2004. Available at http://powersystems.tkk.fi/nordac2004/papers/nordac2004_tahvanainen_et_al_paper.pdf.
44. Tanure, S., Tahan, J., Lima, C., Marangon, J. Establishing Quality Performance of Distribution Companies Based on Yardstick Regulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2006; 21(3): 1148-1153.
45. Thakur, T. Efficiency evaluation of the state owned electric utilities in India. Energy Policy 2006; 34(17): 2788-2804.
46. Torgersen, A., Foørsund, F., Kittelsen, S.. Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1996; 7 (4): 379-398.
47. Vaninsky, A. Efficiency of Electric Power Generation in the United States: Analysis and Forecast Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Energy Economics 2006; 28 (3): 326-338.
48. Vitaliano, D, and Stella, G. A Frontier Approach to Testing the Averch-Johnson Hypothesis. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 2006.
49. Yunos, JM, Hawdon, D. The efficiency of the National Electricity Board in Malaysia: An intercountry comparison using DEA. Energy Economics 1997;19 (2): 255-269.
50. Zhou, M., Zhao, W., Wang, P., Li, G. Hierarchical yardstick competition approach to assessing operation performance of distribution utilities. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems 2008; 32(4):20-24.
51. http://www.bea.doe.gov - a website of the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the United States Department of Commerce (BEA).
52. http://www.eia.doe.gov - a website of the Energy Information Administration of the United States, a section of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).