A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 184, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 638-648

  Li, Shanling ^a   Jahanshahloo, G R ^b   Khodabakhshi, M ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b KHARAZMI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c LORESTAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Infeasibility; Instability; Ranking; Super efficiency

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); SUPER-EFFICIENCY MODEL;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 33846647424     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.063     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adler N., Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 249-265
2. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 10 (1993) 1261-1264
3. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
4. Bardhan I., Bowlin W.F., Cooper W.W., and Sueyoshi T. Model for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part I: Additive models and MED measures. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 39 (1996) 322-332
5. Bazaraa M.S., Jarvis J.J., and Sherali H.D. Linear Programming and Networks Flows (1990), John Wiley & Sons
6. Bogetoft P. Incentive efficient production frontiers: an agency perspective on DEA. Management Science 40 (1994) 959-968
7. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiencies of DMUs. European Journal of Operational Research 2 6 (1978) 429-444
8. Charnes A., Haag S., Jaska P., and Semple J. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of System Science 23 (1992) 789-798
9. Jahanshahloo G.R., and Khodabakhshi M. Suitable combination of inputs for improving outputs in DEA with determining input congestion-Considering textile industry of China. Applied Mathematics and Computation 151 1 (2004) 263-273
10. Dula J.H., and Hickman B.L. Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (1997) 1001-1012
11. M.L. Durchholz, Large-scale data envelopment analysis models and related applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, 1994.
12. Fridman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis and the data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 100 3 (1997) 629-637
13. Jahanshahloo G.R., and Khodabakhshi M. Determining assurance interval for non-Archimedean element in the improving outputs model in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation 151 2 (2004) 501-506
14. Mehrabian S., Alirezaee A., and Jahanshahloo G.R. A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in DEA. Computational Optimization and Applications (COAP) 14 (1999) 261-266
15. Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. INFOR 37 2 (1999) 174-187
16. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., and Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman R.H. (Ed). Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (1986), Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, CA 73-105
17. Thompson R.G., Darmapalah P.S., and Thrall R.M. Importance for DEA of zeros in data, multipliers, and solutions. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 4 (1993) 379-390
18. Thrall R.M. Duality, classification and slacks in data envelopment analysis. The Annals of Operations Research 66 (1996) 109-138
19. Tone K. A slakes-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130 (2001) 498-509
20. K. Tone, A slackes-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, in press.
21. Torgersen A.M., Forsund F.R., and Kittelsen S.A.C. Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 7 (1996) 379-398
22. Xue M., and Harker P.T. Note: Ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models. Management Sciences 48 5 (2002) 705-710
23. Zhu J. Robustness of the efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 90 (1996) 451-460