A combined fuzzy decision making approach to supply chain risk assessment

World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

Volumn 36, Issue , 2009, Pages 519-535

  Moeinzadeh, P ^a,b   Hajfathaliha, A ^b  

^a MAPNA Company ^*  (Iran)

^b SHAHED UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); Fuzzy sets; Supply chain risk management (SCRM); VI ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR)

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE; CRITICAL COMPONENT; FUZZY DECISION MAKING; FUZZY ENVIRONMENTS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LINGUISTIC TERMS; PARAMETERIZED; POINT-BASED; RISK INDICES; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT; TRIANGULAR FUZZY NUMBERS; VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FUZZY SETS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 78651535031     PISSN: 2010376X     EISSN: 20103778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Barry J (2004) Supply chain risk in an uncertain global supply chain environment. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 34/9:695-697
2. Bayazita, O., & Karpak, B. (2007). An analytical network processbased framework for successful total quality management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 79-96.
3. Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141-164.
4. Blackhurst, J. & Craighead, C. & Elkins, D. & Handfield, R., (2005). An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research 43 (19), 4067-4081.
5. Buyukozkan, G. & Ruan, D. (2008), Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 77, 464-475.
6. Chen, C. T. & Lin, C. T. & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289-301.
7. Chen, S. J. & Hwang, C. L. & Hwang, F. P. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System, 375.
8. Chen, L. Y. & Wang, T. C. (2008). Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR, Int. J. Production Economics.
9. Chiclana, F. & Herrera, F. & Herrera-Viedman, E. (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 97, 33-48.
10. Chiou, H. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2002). Fuzzy multiple-criteria decisionmaking approach for industrial green engineering. Environment Management, 30(6), 816-830.
11. Chiou, H. K. & Tzeng, G. H., & Cheng, D. C. (2005). Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach. Omega, 33(3), 223-234.
12. Chopra S. & Sodhi M. (2004) Managing Risk to Avoid Supply Chain Breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review 46/1:53-61
13. Chung, S. H. & Lee, A. H. & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Product mix optimization for semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 1144-1156.
14. Cui, X. & Wang, F. & Li, X. & Zhang, Y. & Yu, S. (2007). A Fuzzy-ANP Approach to Cooperation Risk Evaluation of Virtual Logistics Enterprise, International Conference on Automation and Logistics.
15. Dan, W. & Zan, Y. (2007), Risk Management of Global Supply Chain, International Conference on Automation and Logistics.
16. Dikmen, M. T. & Birgonul & Han, S. (2007) "Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects, " International Journal of Project Management, vol. 25, pp. 494-505.
17. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal ofSystem Sciences, 9(6), 613-626.
18. Duncan, R.B., (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3).
19. Engelhardt-Nowitzki C. & Zsifkovits H. (2006) Complexity-Induced Supply Chain Risks-Interdependencies Between Supply Chain Risk and Complexity Management. In: Kersten W, Blecker T (eds) Managing Risks in Supply Chains: How to Build Reliable Collaboration in Logistics, pp. 37-56, Berlin
20. Fisher, M., (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review 75, 105-117.
21. Hendricks, K.B. & Singhal, V.R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effects of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm, Production Operations Management, 14(1).
22. Henke M. & Kurzhals R. & Jahns C. (2006) Enterprise and Supply Risk Management from the Perspective of Internat and External Auditors. In: Kersten W, Blecker T (eds) Managing Risks in Supply Chains: How to Build Reliable Collaboration in Logistics. pp. 97-109, Berlin
23. Herrera, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Chiclana, F. (2001) Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129, 372-385.
24. Hsieh, T. Y. & Lu, S. T. & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 573-584.
25. Huang, M. & Yang, H.-M. & Wang, X.-W. (2004) "Fuzzy synthetic evaluation based risk evaluation for virtual enterprise, " Mathematics in Practice and Theory, vol. 34, no.6, pp. 45-51.
26. Jahns C. & Hartmann E. & Moder M. (2006) Managing Supply Risks: A System Theory Approach to Supply Early Warning Systems. In: Kersten W, Blecker T (eds) Managing Risks in Supply Chains: How to Build Reliable Collaboration in Logistics. pp. 195-212, Berlin
27. Jahns C. & Henke M. (2004) Supply Risk Management. Managementund Überwachungssystem nach KonTraG zur systematischen Risikobeherrschung, Beschaffung aktuell, 4:38-44
28. Jung JY. & Blau G. & Pekny J. & Reklaitis G. & Eversdyk D. (2004) A simulation based optimization approach to supply chain management under demand uncertainty; Computer and Chemical Engineering 28/10:2087-2106
29. Jüttner U. (2005) Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management 16/1:120-141
30. Kersten W. & Böger M. & Hohrath P. & Späth H (2006) Supply Chain Risk Management: Development of a Theoretical and Empirical Framework. In: Kersten W, Blecker T (eds) Managing Risks in Supply Chains: How to Build Reliable Collaboration in Logistics, pp. 3-17, Berlin
31. Lee, A. H. I. & Chen, W. C. & Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96-107.
32. Lee, H., (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review 44 (3), 105-119.
33. Lee, J.W. & Kim, S.H. (2000) Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection, Comput. Oper. Res. 27, 367-382.
34. Li, Y. & Liao, X.-W. (2007) "Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance, " Decision Support Systems, vol. 42, pp. 2043-32059.
35. March JP. & Shapira Z. (1987) Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking, Management Science, 33:1404
36. Mikhailov L. & Singh, M. G. (2003) "Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems, " IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 33-41, February.
37. Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C., (1978). Organization Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
38. Mohanty, R. P. & Agarwal, R. & Choudhury, A. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2005). A fuzzy ANPbased approach to R&D project selection: A case study. International Journal of Production Research, 43(24), 5199-5216.
39. Müssigmann N (2006) Mitigating Risk during Strategic Supply Network Modeling. In: Kersten W, Blecker T (eds) Managing Risks in Supply Chains: How to Build Reliable Collaboration in Logistics, pp. 213-226, Berlin
40. Onut, S. & Kara, S. S. & Isik, E. (2009), Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 3887-3895.
41. Opricovic, S. (1998) Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
42. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2003). Defuzzification within a fuzzy multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledgebased Systems, 11(5), 635-652.
43. Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.H. (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445-455.
44. Pepiot, G. & Cheikhrouhou, N. & Furbringer, J.-M., & Glardon, R. (2008). A fuzzy approach for the evaluation of competences. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(1), 336-353.
45. Ramik, J. (2006). A decision system using ANP and fuzzy inputs. In 12th international conference on the foundations and applications of utility, risk and decision theory, Roma.
46. Ritchie B. & Brindley C. (2007) Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27/3:303-322
47. Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environment: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. .
48. Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. ISAHP 1999. Kobe, Japan.
49. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1998). Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic network process. Operations Research, 46(4), 491-502.
50. Saaty, T.L. (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh,.
51. Sanayei, A. & Mousavi S. F. & Yazdankhah, A. (2009), Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications.
52. Smeltzer L. & Siferd S. (1998) Proactive supply management: the management of risk, Journal of Supply Chain Management 34/1:38-45
53. Spartalis, S. & Iliadis, L. & Maris, F. (2007) "An innovative risk evaluation system estimating its own fuzzy entropy, " Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 46, pp. 260-267.
54. Spekman RE. & Davis EW. (2004) Risky business: expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 34/5:414-433
55. Teufel S. & Erat A. (2001) Sicherheitsmanagement im Electronic Business. In: Meier A (eds) Internet & Electronic Business, Zürich.
56. Teuteberg, F. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Neural Network Approach, E-Business and Information Systems & Research Center for Information Systems in Project and Innovation Networks.
57. Tuzkaya, U. R., & Onut, S. (2008). A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study. Information Sciences, 178, 3133-3146.
58. Tsay, A. & Nahmias, S. & Agrawal, N. (1999) "Modeling supply chain contracts: A review, in: S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, M. Magazine (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, " Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp. 299_336.
59. Tzeng, G.H. & Lin, C.W. & Opricovic, S. (2005) Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation, Energy Policy 33, 1373-1383.
60. van Wyk J. & Baerwaldt W. (2005) External Risks and the Global Supply Chain in the Chemicals Industry. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 6/1:1-15.
61. Venkatraman, N. & Camillus, J. (1984). Exploring the concept of "fit" in strategic management. The Academy of Management Review 9 (3), 513-525.
62. Wagner, S.M. & Bode, C., (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1).
63. Wang, T. C., & Chang, T. H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 870-880.
64. Wen, L. & Xi, Z. (2007). Supply Chain Risk Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Lattice-Order Decision-Making, International Conference on Automation and Logistics.
65. Wu, H. Y. & Tzeng, G. H. & Chen, Y. H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 10135-10147.
66. Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 841-847.
67. Yüksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.
68. Yu, P.L., (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science 19 (8), 936-946.
69. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
70. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning I. Information Science, 8(3), 199-249.
71. Zeleny, M., (1974). The concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Computers & Operations Research 1 (4), 479-496.