Structure and function in patients with glaucomatous defects near fixation

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 130-139

  Shafi, Asifa ^a   Swanson, William H ^b   Dul, Mitchell W ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

glaucoma; macula; neuroretinal rim; Perimetry; structure function

Indexed keywords

GLAUCOMA; MACULA; NEURORETINAL RIM; PERIMETRY; STRUCTURE-FUNCTION;

ALGORITHMS; DISEASE CONTROL; EYE PROTECTION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY;

DEFECT STRUCTURES;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OPTIC NERVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINA; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651483079     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fa38f4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:844-51.
2. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:417-21.
3. Owen VM, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP. Measurement variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph imaging of neuroretinal rim area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5322-30.
4. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Thumann G, Jonescu-Cuypers CP, Krieglstein GK. Quantitative morphologic and functional evaluation of the optic nerve head in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 44(suppl 1):S41-53.
5. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:201-51.
6. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2213-20.
7. Harwerth RS, Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 2006: a neuron doctrine for glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:436-44.
8. Swanson WH, Felius J, Pan F. Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:466-72.
9. Sun H, Dul MW, Swanson WH. Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:455-65.
10. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24:333-54.
11. Strouthidis NG, Scott A, Peter NM, Garway-Heath DF. Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2904-10.
12. Deleon-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G Jr, Xie A, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglauco-matous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3374-80.
13. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Liebmann JM, Hong JE, Chen CS, Thienprasiddhi P. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1672-81.
14. Hood DC. Relating retinal nerve fiber thickness to behavioral sensitivity in patients with glaucoma: application of a linear model. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2007;24:1426-30.
15. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure-function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4254-66.
16. Racette L, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. The impact of the perimetric measurement scale, sample composition, and statistical method on the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2007;16:676-84.
17. Hot A, Dul MW, Swanson WH. Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3049-57.
18. Yang A, Swanson WH. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology 2007;114:671-9.
19. Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007;26:688-710.
20. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1809-15.
21. Harwerth RS, Vilupuru AS, Rangaswamy NV, Smith EL III. The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:763-73.
22. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46:3712-7.
23. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Garway-Heath DF, Fogagnolo P, Garcia-Feijoo J. Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3018-25.
24. Jansonius NM, Nevalainen J, Selig B, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Budde WM, Jonas JB, Lagreze WA, Airaksinen PJ, Vonthein R, Levin LA, Paetzold J, Schiefer U. Amathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina. Vision Res 2009;49:2157-63.
25. Wyatt HJ. A hypothesis concerning the relationship between retinotopy in the optic nerve head and perimetry. Clin Vis Sci 1992;7:153-62.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
27. Wyatt HJ, Dul MW, Swanson WH. Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity. Vision Res 2007;47:925-36.
28. Artes PH, Crabb DP. Estimating normative limits of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc rim area with quantile regression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:355-61.
29. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1557-63.
30. Hawker MJ, Vernon SA, Tattersall CL, Dua HS. Linear regression modeling of rim area to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous optic nerve heads: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project. J Glaucoma 2007;16:345-51.
31. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, Dada T, Singh R. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glauco-matous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2006-10.
32. Cho J, Raza AS, De Moraes CG, Wang M, Zhang X, Kardon RH, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. A Y(RGC) layer thickness to local losses in visual field sensitivity in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:E-abstract 4897.
33. Raza AS, de Moraes CG, Xin D, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. Small arcuate "comma" defects within 10 degrees of the fovea in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:E-abstract 5514.
34. Veerappan A, Dul M, Swanson W, Lin E. Relations between macular structural and functional measures of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:E-abstract 4903.