Determining mechanisms of visual loss in glaucoma using Rarebit perimetry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 48-55

  Hackett, Deborah A ^a   Anderson, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

contrast sensitivity; dysfunction; glaucoma; Rarebit perimetry; thresholds

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DYSFUNCTION; GLAUCOMA; RAREBIT PERIMETRY; THRESHOLDS;

CELL DEATH; LUMINANCE;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; RETINA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; RETINA; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

EID: 78651477984     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fa6328     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Frisén L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing. Vision Res 2002;42:1931-9.
2. Martin L, Wanger P. New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2004;13:268-72.
3. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Parisi L, Zeppieri M. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:180-4.
4. Gedik S, Akman A, Akova YA. Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1065-9.
5. Frisén L. Spatial vision in visually asymptomatic subjects at high risk for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1145-7.
6. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Wanger P, Martin L. Early detection of macular changes in patients with diabetes using Rarebit Fovea Test and optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1596-8.
7. Martin L, Ley D, Marsal K, Hellstrom A. Visual function in young adults following intrauterine growth retardation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2004;41:212-8.
8. Martin LM, Nilsson AL. Rarebit perimetry and optic disk topography in pediatric glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2007;44:223-31.
9. Weber AJ, Harman CD. Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3197-207.
10. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Morgan WH. Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1846-53.
11. Ansari EA, Morgan JE, Snowden RJ. Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1131-5.
12. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:821-7.
13. Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Demirel S, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Johnson CA. A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry. Vision Res 2008;48:1859-69.
14. North RV, Jones AL, Drasdo N, Wild JM, Morgan JE. Electrophysiological evidence of early functional damage in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:1216-22.
15. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Holopigian K, Bauer R, Firoz B, Liebmann JM, Odel JG, Ritch R. An attempt to detect glaucomatous damage to the inner retina with the multifocal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1570-9.
16. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
17. Nilsson M, Wanger P, Martin L. Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea: normative data for the Rarebit Foveal Test. Clin Exp Optom 2006;89:81-5.
18. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Cello KE, Bandermann SE, Fan J, Levine RA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). J Glaucoma 2007;16:665-9.
19. Martin L. Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:670-7.
20. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St Louis: Mosby; 1993.
21. Pavlicek W, Owen JM, Peter MB. Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays. J Digit Imaging 2000;13:155-61.
22. Pianta MJ, Kalloniatis M. Characterisation of dark adaptation in human cone pathways: an application of the equivalent background hypothesis. J Physiol 2000;528:591-608.
23. Bolanowski SJ Jr, Doty RW. Perceptual "blankout" of monocular homogeneous fields (Ganzfelder) is prevented with binocular viewing. Vision Res 1987;27:967-82.
24. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 1995;35:2503-22.
25. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404-13.
26. Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.
27. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5-25.
28. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 1990;292:497-523.
29. Shou T, Liu J, Wang W, Zhou Y, Zhao K. Differential dendritic shrinkage of alpha and beta retinal ganglion cells in cats with chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3005-10.
30. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, FaragherEB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:417-21.
31. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1404-10.
32. Drance SM. Diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1533-8.
33. Henson DB, Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Diffuse loss of sensitivity in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3147-51.
34. Anderson RS. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:79-97.
35. Dacey DM. The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina. J Neurosci 1993;13:5334-55.
36. Peichl L, Wassle H. The structural correlate of the receptive field centre of alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Physiol 1983;341:309-24.
37. Fellman RL, Lynn JR, Starita RJ, Swanson WH. Clinical importance of spatial summation in glaucoma. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update, 1988-89: Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver, Canada, May 9-12, 1988. Amsterdam; Berkeley: Kugler & Ghedini; 1989:313-24.
38. Redmond T, Garway-Heath DF, Zlatkova MB, Anderson RS. Elevated perimetric thresholds in early glaucoma are matched to an enlargement of the area of complete spatial summation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:E-Abstract 5507.
39. Martin PR, Grünert U Ganglion cells in the mammalian retinae. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS, ed. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004:410-21.
40. King WM, Sarup V, Sauvé Y, Moreland CM, Carpenter DO, Sharma SC. Expansion of visual receptive fields in experimental glaucoma. Vis Neurosci 2006;23:137-42.
41. Sharma SC. Changes of central visual receptive fields in experimental glaucoma. Prog Brain Res 2008;173:479-91.