Multiple testing and power calculations in genetic association studies

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  So, Hon Cheong ^a   Sham, Pak C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CALCULATION; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; NULL HYPOTHESIS; POWER ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SAMPLE SIZE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 78651442508     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top95     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allison DB, Gadbury GL, Heo MS, Fernandez JR, Lee CK, Prolla TA, Weindruch R. 2002. A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Computat Statist Data Anal 39: 1-20.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57: 289-300.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1997. Multiple hypotheses testing with weights. Scand J Statist 24: 407-418.
4. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Statist 29: 1165-1188.
5. Chen WM, Deng HW. 2001. A general and accurate approach for computing the statistical power of the transmission disequilibrium test for complex disease genes. Genet Epidemiol 21: 53-67.
6. Cox DR, Wong MY. 2004. A simple procedure for the selection of significant effects. J R Statist Soc Ser B 66: 395-400.
7. Dudbridge F, Koeleman BP. 2004. Efficient computation of significance levels for multiple associations in large studies of correlated data, including genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 75: 424-435.
8. Efron B. 2007. Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. J Am Statist Assoc 102: 93-103.
9. Everitt BS, Bullmore ET. 1999. Mixture model mapping of brain activation in functional magnetic resonance images. Hum Brain Mapp 7: 1-14.
10. Ghosh A, Zou F, Wright FA. 2008. Estimating odds ratios in genome scans: An approximate conditional likelihood approach. Am J Hum Genet 82: 1064-1074.
11. Knapp M. 1999. A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1177-1185.
12. Lange C, Laird NM. 2002. Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: Dichotomous traits. Am J Hum Genet 71: 575-584.
13. Lange C, DeMeo DL, Laird NM. 2002. Power and design considerations for a general class of family-based association tests: Quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 71: 1330-1341.
14. Nyholt DR. 2004. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74: 765-769.
15. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC. 2003. Genetic power calculator: Design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19: 149-150.
16. Risch N, Merikangas K. 1996. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273: 1516-1517.
17. Roeder K, Bacanu SA, Wasserman L, Devlin B. 2006. Using linkage genome scans to improve power of association in genome scans. Am J Hum Genet 78: 243-252.
18. Salyakina D, Seaman SR, Browning BL, Dudbridge F, Muller-Myhsok B. 2005. Evaluation of Nyholt's procedure for multiple testing correction. Hum Hered 60: 19-25 discussion 61-62.
19. Seaman SR, Muller-Myhsok B. 2005. Rapid simulation of P values for product methods and multiple-testing adjustment in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 76: 399-408.
20. Sham PC, Cherny SS, Purcell S, Hewitt JK. 2000. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1616-1630.
21. Storey JD. 2003. The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Statist 31: 2013-2035.
22. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genome wide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 9440-9445.
23. Zhong H, Prentice RL. 2008. Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics 9: 621-634.
24. Zollner S, Pritchard JK. 2007. Overcoming the winner's curse: Estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am J Hum Genet 80: 605-615.