Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Guerriero, Carla ^a   Gillan, Maureen Gc ^b   Cairns, John ^a   Wallis, Matthew G ^c   Gilbert, Fiona J ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC HEALTH; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78651411272     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. An audit of screen detected breast cancers for the year of screening April 2007 to March 2008. NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery at BASO (2008), http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/ publications/ba07-08.html
2. Breast and cervical screening: the first 20 years. NHS Breast Screening Programme (2008), http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/nhscsp-20years.pdf
3. Annual review. NHS Breast Screening Programme, Sheffield. UK 2008 http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp- annualreview2008.pdf
4. Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography. S Astley FJ Gilbert, Clinical Radiology 2004 59 390 399 10.1016/j.crad.2003.11.017 15081844
5. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. P Taylor J Champness R Given-Wilson K Johnston H Potts, Health Technol Assess 2005 9 6 1 58 iii
6. Breast screening radiographers and radiologists: performance and confidence levels on the PERFORMS film sets. CE Griffiths, Breast Cancer Res 2004 6 Suppl 1 10 10.1186/bcr829
7. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. MA Helvie L Hadjiiski E Makariou,, et al. Radiology 2004 231 208 214 10.1148/radiol. 2311030429 14990808
8. The Preponderance of Evidence Supports Computer-aided Detection for Screening Mammography. RL Birdwell, Radiology 2009 253 9 16 10.1148/radiol. 2531090611 19789250
9. Can Computer-aided Detection Be Detrimental to Mammographic Interpretation? LE Philpotts, Radiology 2009 253 17 22 10.1148/radiol.2531090689 19789251
10. Early detection of breast cancer: Overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening. N Houssami R Given-Wilson S Ciatto, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 2009 53 171 6 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x 19527363
11. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. P Taylor HWW Potts, European Journal of Cancer 2008 44 798 807 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 18353630
12. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. FJ Gilbert SM Astley MG Gillan OF Agbaje MG Wallis J James CR Boggis SW Duffy the CADET II Group, N Engl J Med 2008 359 1675 1684 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545 18832239
13. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: Results from the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. RG Blanks MG Wallis SM Moss, J Med Screen 1998 5 195 201 9934650
14. Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: Two versus one view mammography. RG Blanks RM Given-Wilson SM Moss, J Med Screen 1998 5 141 145 9795875
15. Cancer Reform Strategy 2007. Department of Health, http://www.dh.gov.uk/ prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh-081007.pdf
16. Updated guide to the methods of technology appraisal. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), NICE 2008 http://www.nice.org.uk/ aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/technologyappraisalprocessguides/ guidetothemethodsoftechnologyappraisal.jsp?domedia = 1&mid=B52851A3-19B9- E0B5-D48284D172BD8459
17. Breast Screening Programme, England 2007-08. The NHS Information Centre, NHS Information Centre 2009 http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data- collections/screening/breast-cancer/breast-screening-programme-england-2007-08
18. New ways of working in the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Fifth Report on Implementation. C Nickerson S Cush, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes 2008
19. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2008. L Curtis, Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury 2008 http://www.pssru.ac. uk/pdf/uc/uc2008/uc2008.pdf
20. NHS Staff Earnings Estimates, October to December 2007. Information Centre for Health and Social Care, NHS Information Centre 2008 http://www.ic.nhs.uk/default.asp?sID=1204128005603
21. Cost-Effectiveness of full field digital mammography (FFDM) and computed radiography (CR) versus film/screen imaging for mammography. JA Cole CP Lawinski PJ Clinch DP Emerton A Mackenzie, Centre for Evidence based Purchasing 08015 NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency 2008
22. Evaluation of CAD with Full Field Digital Mammography in the NHS Breast Screening Programme. P Taylor S Wilson H Potts L Wilkinson L Khoo R Given-Wilson, NHSBSP Equipment Report 0910 NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Sheffield 2009
23. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. M Drummond BJ O'Brien G Torrance G Stoddart, Oxford University Press, Oxford Second 1997
24. An Audit of screen detected breast cancers for the year of screening. April 2008 to March 2010. NHS Breast Screening Programme &Association of Breast Surgery at BASO, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes 19th May 2010. York
25. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer. I Griebrsh J Brown C Boggis A Dixon M Dixon D Easton R Eeles DG Evans FJ Gilbert J Hawnaur P Kessar SR Lakhani SM Moss A Nerurkar AR Padhani LJ Pointon J Potterton D Thompson LW Turnbull LG Walker R Warren MO Leach,, et al. British Journal of Cancer 2006 95 801 810 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603356 17016484
26. Breast Screening Programme England 2008-09: Women screened by age, SHA and outcome. Table 7 & 7a. NHS Information Centre, http://www.ic.nhs.uk/ statistics-and-data-collections/screening/breast-screening/breast-screening- programme-england-2008-09
27. A Rapid-Response Economic Evaluation of the UK NHS Cancer Reform Strategy Breast Cancer Screening Program Extension via a Plausible Bounds Approach. J Madan A Radwin M Stevenson P Tappenden, Value in Health 2010 13 215 221 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00667.x 19878494
28. Computer-aided detection in Mammography CEPP09040. Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing Economic report, NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency 2009
29. A Briggs M Sculpher K Claxton, Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation Oxford University Press 2008
30. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices. P Taylor RM Given-Wilson, Br J Radiol 2005 78 Spec No 1 26 30 10.1259/bjr/84545410 15917442
31. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study. KK Lindfors MC McGahan CJ Rosenquist GS Hurlock, Radiology 2006 239 710 7 10.1148/radiol.2392050670 16569787
32. Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screening mammograms. TM Haygood T Wang EN Atkinson D Lane TW Stephens P Patel GJ Whitman, AJR 2009 192 216 220 10.2214/AJR.07.3608 19098202
33. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. EA Berns RE Hendrick M Solari L Barke D Reddy J Wolfman L Segal P DeLeon S Benjamin L Willis, AJR 2005 187 38 41 10.2214/AJR.05.1397
34. Matthew Wallis, Cambridge Breast Unit, personal communication based on a survey for the Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group 2004/5 and 2005/6.
35. S Taylor-Phillips, Loughborough University, personal communication.
36. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. N Karssemeijer D Bluekens JJ Deurenberg M Beekman R Visser R can Engen A Bartels-Kortland MJ Broeders, Radiology 2009 253 353 8 10.1148/radiol.2532090225 19703851
37. Psychological consequences of screening mammography. J Cockburn M Staples SF Hurley T De Luise, Journal of Medical Screening 1994 1 7 12 8790480
38. Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall on women with and without a family history of breast cancer. FJ Gilbert CM Cordiner IR Affleck DB Hood D Mathieson LG Walker, European J Cancer 1998 34 2010 2014 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00294-9 (Pubitemid 28546933)
39. CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments. A Malich DR Fisher J Bottcher, Eur Radiol 2006 16 1449 1460 10.1007/s00330-005-0089-x 16416275
40. Computer Aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. EA Krupinski, Radiology 2004 231 7 9 10.1148/radiol. 2311031864 15054153
41. The impact of reader training on computer-aided detection in mammography. SM Astley C Chasser C Qarteman VF Hillier F Gilbert C Boggis, Proceeding Seventh International Workshop on Digital Mammography Chapel Hill NC, Pisano E, 2004 140
42. Cost effectiveness of non-consensus double reading. JA Cairns M Van Der Pol, The Breast 1998 7 243 6 10.1016/S0960-9776(98)90088-1 (Pubitemid 28510732)