Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 78, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages

  Taylor, P ^a   Given Wilson, R M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED KINGDOM;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 21644458537     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/84545410     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Taylor PM, Champness J, Given-Wilson RM, Potts HWW, Johnston K. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms. Br J Radiol 2004;77:21-7.
2. Taylor P, Given-Wilson R, Champness J, Potts H, Johnston K. Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers. Clin Radiol 2004;59:1099-105.
3. Taylor P, Khoo L, Given-Wilson R. Prospective study of the new release of the R2 ImageChecker in the UK screening setting. In: Pisano E, editor. Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Digital Mammography; 2004 June 18-21; Chapel Hill, NC. [in press.]
4. Astley SM, Gilbert FJ. Computer-aided detection in mammography. Clin Radiol 2004;59:390-9.
5. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-6.
6. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;496:185-90.
7. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-62.
8. Chan H, Doi K, Vyborny C, et al. Improvements in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1102-10.
9. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001;56:150-4.
10. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Risso G, Catarzi S, Bonardi R, Viterbo V, et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:135-8.
11. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one-view mammography. J Med Screen 1999;6:152-8.
12. Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA. Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 2002;9:531-40.
13. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, Clearfield RJ, Cohen CS, Ganott MA, et al. Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Cancer 2004;100:1590-4.
14. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multi-institutional trial. AJR 2003;181:687-93.