Impact of some external factors on the values of mechanical parameters determined in tests on bone tissue

Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 85-93

  Nikodem, Anna ^a   Ścigała, Krzysztof ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

In vivo and in vitro factors; Mechanical properties of bone

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMUR; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEEP; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMUR; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEEP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 78651384139     PISSN: 1509409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. An Y.H., Draughn RA., Mechanical testing of bone and bone-implant interface, CRC Press LLC, 2000.
2. Bedzinski R., Nikodem A., Ścigala K., Investigation of mechanical structure of long bone, Machine Dynamics Problems, 2004, 28(3), 45-50.
3. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C., The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure, American Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1977, 59, 954.
4. Ciarelli T.E., Fyhrie D.P., Schaffler M.B., Goldstein S.A., Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fracture and in controls, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000, 15, 32-40.
5. Cosmi F., Morphology-based prediction of elastic properties of trabecular bone samples, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2009, 11(1), 3-9.
6. Cowin S.C., Bone Mechanics Handbook, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 2001.
7. Cowin S.C., Cardoso L., Fabric dependence of bone ultrasound, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2010, 12(2), 3-23.
8. Crenshaw T.D., Peo E.R., Lewis A.J., Influence of age, sex and calcium and phosphorus levels on the mechanical properties of various bone in swine, Journal of Animal Science, 1981, 52, 1319.
9. Currey J.D.,Comparative mechanical properties and histology of bone, American Zoologist, 1984, 24(1), 5-12.
10. Evans F.G., Mechanical properties of bone, Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA, 1973.
11. Frankel V.H., Nordin M., Basic Biomechanics of the Skeletal System, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1980.
12. Hodgskinson R., Currey J., The effect of variation in structure on the Young's modulus of cancellous bone: A comparison of human and non-human material, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1990, 204, 115-121.
13. Huiskes R., If bone is the answer, then what is the question? Journal of Anatomy, 2000, 197, 145-156.
14. Kabel J., Odgaard A., Van Rietbergen B., Huiskes R., Connectivity and the elastic properties of cancellous bone, Bone, 1999, 24(2), 115-120.
15. Keaveny T.M., Pinilla T.P., Crawford R.P., Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1997, 15, 101.
16. Keller T.S., Mao Z., Spendgler D.M., Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1990, 8, 592.
17. Linde F., Hvid I., Madsen F., The effect of specimen size and geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone, Journal of Biomechanics, 1992, 25, 359.
18. Linde F., Sorensen H.C., The effect of different storage methods on mechanical properties of trabecular bone, Journal of Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 1249.
19. McCALDEN R., McGEOUGH J.A., Barker M.B., Court-Brown C.M., Age-related changes in the density and tensile strength of human femoral cortical bone, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993, 75A, 1193.
20. Mosekilde L., Mosekilde L., Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biochemical competence in normal individuals, Bone, 1990, 11, 67-73.
21. Nikodem A., Kuropka P., Bejdzinski R., Kuryszko J., The influence of choosing chemical methods to bone structures properties, Biomaterials Engineering, 2004, 38-42, 194-196.
22. Rauber A., Elastizitt und Festigkeit der Knochen: anato-misch-physiologische Studie, Engelmann, Leipzig, 1976.
23. Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., Bowman J.A., On the dependence of elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density, Journal of Biomechanics, 1988, 22, 155-168.
24. Rogala P., Uklejewski R., Osteoporotyczny proces niszc-zenia kości. Zarys wspólczesnych poglqdów biomedycznych i bioinżynierskich, praca zbiorowa pod red. J. Ranachowskiego i F. Rejmunda, Procesy niszczenia i wytrzymałosc ceramiki, kości, betonu, Warszawa, 1996.
25. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E., Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog, Journal of Experimental Biology, 1982, 101, 187-211.
26. Turner C.H., Burr D.B., Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial, Bone, 1993, 14, 595-608.
27. Turner C.H., Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., Cowin S.C., The dependence of elastic constants of cancellous bone upon structural density and fabric, Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society, 1988, 13, 74.
28. Uklejewski R., Winiecki M., Rogala P., Zgodnosc strukturalno-adaptacyjna polqczeh kości z porowatymi implantami na podstawie tradycyjnego jednofazowego i wspólczesnego dwufazowego porosprezystego modelu biomechanicznego tkanki kostnej, Engineering of Biomaterials, 2006, 1-13, 54-55.
29. Yamada H., Strength of Biological Materials, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1973.
30. Zipous P., Currey J.D., Changes in the stiffness, strength and toughness of human cortical bone with age, Bone, 1998, 22, 56.