Phytoplankton community composition can be predicted best in terms of morphological groups

Limnology and Oceanography

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 110-118

  Kruk, C ^a   Peeters, E T H M ^a   Van Nes, E H ^a   Huszar, V L M ^b   Costa, L S ^b   Scheffer, M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CORRELATION; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYTOPLANKTON; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; VOLUME;

EID: 78651382633     PISSN: 00243590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0110     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Anderson, T. R. 2005. Plankton functional type modeling: Running before we can walk? Horizons. J. Plank. Res. 27: 1073-1081.
2. Arrigo, K. 2005. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437: 349-355, doi:10.1038/nature04159
3. Benincà E., and others. 2008. Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community. Nature 451: 822-825, doi:10.1038/nature06512
4. Bergquist, A. M., S. R. Carpenter, and J. C. Latino. 1985. shifts in phytoplankton size structure and community composition during grazing by contrasting zooplankton assemblages. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 1037-1045, doi:10.4319/ lo.1985.30.5.1037
5. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Planzensociologie, 3rd ed. Springer. (Plants sociology).
6. Carpenter, S. R., J. A. Morrice,J.J. Elser,A. S. Amand, and N. A. Mackay. 1993. Phytoplankton community dynamics, p. 189-209. In S. R. Carpenter and J. F. Kitchell [eds.], The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge Univ. Press.
7. Cavender-Bares, J. K., H. Kenneth, P.V.A. Fine, and S. W. Kembel. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12: 693-715, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x
8. De Leon, L. 2000. Phytoplankton community composition and dynamic in a subtropical reservoir (Salto Grande, Uruguay- Argentina). Master's thesis. Univ. de Conception.
9. Doney, S. C., J. A. Kleypas, J. L.Sarmiento, and P. G. Falkowski. 2002. The US JGOFS synthesis and modeling project-an introduction. Deep-Sea Res. II, 49: 1-20.
10. Elliott, J. A., S. J. Thackeray, C. Huntingford, and R. G. Jones. 2005. Combining a Regional Climate Model with a phytoplankton community model to predict future changes in phytoplankton in lakes. Fresh. Biol. 46: 1291-1297, doi:10.1046/j.l365-2427.2001.00754.x
11. Falkowski, P. G., E. A. Laws,R. T.Barber, and J. W. Murray. 2003. Phytoplankton and their role in primary, new, and export production, p. 99-121. In M. J. R. Fasham [ed.], ocean biogeochemistry: The role of the ocean carbon cycle in global change. Springer.
12. Fenchel, T. O., and B. J. Finlay. 2004. The ubiquity of small species: Patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54: 777-784, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0777:TUOSSP]2.0. CO;2
13. Finlay, B. J., and K. J. Clarke. 1999. Ubiquitous dispersal of microbial species. Nature 400: 828, doi:10.1038/23616
14. Graham, L. E., and L. W. Wilcox. 2000. Algae, 1st ed. Prentice-Hall.
15. Happey-Wood, C. M. 1988. Ecology of freshwater planktonic green algae, p. 175-226. In C. D. Sandgren [ed.], Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cam bridge Univ. Press.
16. Hillebrand, H. 2004. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163: 192-210, doi:10.1086/381004
17. - C. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, T. Zohary, and U. Pollingher. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol. 35: 403-424, doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
18. Huisman, J., and F. J. Weissing. 2001. Fundamental unpredict ability in multispecies competition. Am. Nat. 157: 488-194, doi:10.1086/319929
19. Hutchinson, G. E. 1961. The paradox of plankton. Am. Nat. 882: 137-145, doi:10.1086/282171
20. Komárek, J., and K. Anagnostidis. 1999. Cyanoprokaryota I. Teil Chroococcales. Gustav Fisher Verlag.
21. - and - 2005. Cyanoprokaryota II. Teil Oscillatoriales. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
22. Kosten, S., V. L. M. Huszar, N. Mazzeo, M. Scheffer, L.S.L. Sternberg, and E. Jeppesen. 2009. Limitation of phytoplankton growth in South America: No evidence for increasing nitrogen limitation towards the tropics. Ecol. Appl. 19: 1791-1804, doi:10.1890/08-0906.1
23. Kruk, C., N. Mazzeo, G. Lacerot, and C. S. Reynolds. 2002. Classification schemes for phytoplankton: A local validation of a functional approach to the analysis of species temporal replacement. J. Plank. Res. 24: 901-912, doi:10.1093/plankt/24.9.901
24. - and others. 2009. Determinants of biodiversity in subtropical shallow lakes (Atlantic coast, uruguay). Fresh. Biol. 54: 2628-2641, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02274.x
25. - and others. 2010. A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Fresh. Biol. 55: 614-627, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427. 2009.02298.x
26. Le Quéré, C., and others. 2005. Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models. Glob. Change Biol. 11: 2016-2040.
27. Litchman, E., and C. A. Klausmeier. 2008. Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 615-639, doi:10.1146/annurev. ecolsys.39.110707.173549
28. - J. R. Miller, O.M. Schofield, and P. G. Falkowski. 2006. Multi-nutrient, multi-group model of present and future oceanic phytoplankton communities. Biogeosciences 3: 585-606, doi:10.5194/bg-3-585-2006
29. Lund, J. W. G., C. Kipling, and E. D. Le Cren. 1959. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143-170, doi:10.1007/BF00007865
30. Lürling, M. 2003. The effect of substances from different zooplankton species and fish on the induction of defensive morphology in the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. J. Plank. Res. 25: 979-989, doi:10.1093/plankt/25.8.979
31. Marañón, E. 2008. Inter-specific scaling of phytoplankton production and cell size in the field. J. Plank. Res. 30: 157-163, doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm087
32. Margalef, R. 1978. Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. oceanol. Acta 1: 493-509.
33. Mazzeo, N., and others. 2003. Effects of Egeria densa Planch. beds on a shallow lake without piscivorous fish. Hydrobiologia 506-509: 591-602, doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008571.40893.77
34. McCauley, E., and W. W. Murdoch. 1987. Cyclic and stable populations: Plankton as paradigm. Am. Nat. 129: 97-121,doi:10.1086/284624
35. McGill, B., B. J. Enquist,E.Weiher, and M. Westoby. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 178-185.
36. Mieleitner, J., M. Borsuk, H.-R. Burgi, and P. Reichert. 2008. Identifying functional groups of phytoplankton using data from three lakes of different trophic state. Aquat. Sci. 70: 30-46, doi:10.1007/s00027-007-0940-z
37. Møller,A.P., and M. D. Jennions. 2002. How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists. Oecologia 132: 492-500, doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2
38. Naselli-Flores, L., J. Padisák, and M. Albay. 2007. Shape and size in phytoplankton ecology: Do they matter? Hydrobiologia 578: 157-161, doi:10.1007/s10750-006-2815-z
39. Nunn, G. B., and S. E. Stanley. 1998. Body size effects and rates of cytochrome b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1360-1371.
40. Padisák, J. 2003. Phytoplankton, p. 251-308. In P. E. O'Sullivan and C. S. Reynolds [eds.], The lakes handbook: 1. Limnology and limnetic ecology. Blackwell science.
41. - L. O. Crossetti, and L. Naselli-Flores. 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: A critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia 621: 1-19, doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9645-0
42. - and C. S. Reynolds. 1998. Selection of phytoplankton associations in Lake Balaton, Hungary, in response to eutrophication and restoration measures, with special reference to the cyanoprokaryotes. Hydrobiologia 384: 41-53, doi:10.1023/A:1003255529403
43. Paerl, H. W. 1988. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), p. 261-315. In C. D. sandgren [ed.], Growth and reproductive strategies of fresh water phytoplankton. Cambridge univ. Press.
44. - and J. Huisman. 2009. Minireview climate change: A catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1: 27-37, doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.2008.00004.x
45. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environ ment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical Computing.
46. Reynolds, C. S. 1984. Phytoplankton periodicity: The interaction of form, function and environmental variability. Fresh. Biol. 14: 111-142, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00027.x
47. - 2006. Ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge Univ. Press.
48. - V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores, and S. Melo. 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J. Plank. Res. 24: 417-428, doi:10.1093/plankt/24.5.417
49. Round, F. E., R. M. Crawford, and D. G. Mann. 1992. The Diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press.
50. Roy, S. C., and J. Chattopadhyay. 2007. Towards a resolution of 'the paradox of plankton': A brief overview of the proposed mechanisms. Ecol. Compl. 4: 26-33, doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.016
51. Salmaso, N., and J. Padisák. 2007. Morpho-functional groups and phytoplankton development in two deep lakes (Lake Garda, Italy, and Lake Stechlin, Germany). Hydrobiologia 578: 97-112, doi:10.1007/s10750-006-0437-0
52. Sandgren, C.D.[Ed.]. 1988a, Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge Univ. Press.
53. Sandgren,C.D.[Ed.]. 1988b. The ecology of Chrysophyte flagel lates: Their growth and perennation strategies as freshwater phytoplankton, p. 9-104. In C. D. Sandgren,[Ed.], Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge Univ. Press.
54. Scheffer, M., S. Rinaldi, J. Huisman, and F. J. Weissing. 2003. Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: Solutions to the paradox. Hydrobiologia 491: 9-18, doi:10.1023/A:1024404804748
55. - and E. H. Van Nes. 2006. Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6230-6235, doi:10.1073/pnas.0508024103
56. Schmidt, D. N., D. Lazarus, J. R.Young, and M. Kucera. 2006. Biogeography and evolution of body size in marine plankton. Earth-Sci. Rev. 78: 239-266, doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.05.004
57. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analyses: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate ecology. Ecology 67: 1167-1179, doi:10.2307/1938672
58. - and P. Smilauer. 1998. Canoco reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). Microcomputer Power.
59. Tüxen, R. 1955. Das systeme der nordwestdeutschen pflanzenge sellschaft. Mitt florist-sociolog arbeitsgem. 5: 155-176. [The northwestern Germany plant community system].
60. Utermöhl, H. 1958. Zur Vervollkomnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. (For the perfection of quantitative phytoplankton methodology). Mitteilungen. Communica tions. Internationale Vereiningung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9: 1-38.
61. Vamosi, S. M., S. B. Heard, J.C. Vamosi, and C. O. Webb. 2009. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis ofphylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 18: 572-592, doi:10.1111/ j.1365-294X.2008.04001.x
62. Van Den Hoeck, D., G. Mann, and H. M. Jahns. 1997. Algae: An introduction of phycology. Cambridge univ. Press.
63. Vanni, M. J., and D. L. Findlay. 1990. Trophic cascades and phytoplankton community. Structure Ecol. 71: 921-937.
64. Vergnon, R., N. K. Dulvy, and R. P. Freckleton. 2009. Niches versus neutrality: uncovering the drivers of diversity in a species-rich community. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1079-1090, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01364.x
65. Webb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, M.A. McPeek, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 475-505, doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448
66. Weithoff, G. 2003. The concepts of 'plant functional types' and 'functional diversity' in lake phytoplankton-a new under standing of phytoplankton ecology? Fresh. Biol. 48: 1669-1675, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003. 01116.x