Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography - A retrospective study;Endoskopisk retrograd kolangiopankreatikografi - Et fireårsmateriale

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 560-562

  Mala, Tom ^a,b   Lunde, Ole Christian ^a   Nesbakken, Arild ^a,b,c   Aadland, Erling ^a   Stiris, Morten ^a  

^a AKER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c Buskerud Sentralsykehus   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BILE DUCT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0034688566     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bret PM, Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancretography. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 472-86.
2. Bearcroft PW, Lomas DJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancretography. Gut 1997; 41: 135-37.
3. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Ferrucci JT. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:258-63.
4. Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M, Breer H, Schiling D, Riemann JF. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998; 43: 680-3.
5. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1364-6.
6. Musella M, Barblace G, Caparelli G, Carrano A, Castaldo P, Tamburrini O et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 16-9.
7. Varghese JC, Farell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ. A prospective comparison of magnetic cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 513-20.
8. Takahera Y. Can MRCP replace ERCP? J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 517-34.
9. Tennøe B, Stiris MG, Dullerud R, Lunde OC, Aadland E. Magnetisk resonanstomografi av galle- og pancreasgang. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1999; 119: 3252-6.
10. Hauer-Jensen M, Kåresen R, Nygaard K, Solheim K, Amlie E, Havig Ø et al. Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. Ann Surg 1985; 202: 64-8.
11. Choudari CP, Fogel E, Gottlieb K, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Therapeutic biliary endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 163-73.
12. Shimizu S, Kutsumi H, Fujimoto S, Kawai K. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 158-62.
13. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imag 1996; 21: 385-94.
14. De Beaux AC, Carter DC, Palmer KR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and acute pancreatitis. Gut 1996; 38: 799-800.
15. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 13: 909-18.
16. Boender J, Nix GAJJ, de Ridder MAJ, van Blankenstein M, Schutte HE, Dees J et al. Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate. Endoscopy 1994; 26: 209-16.
17. Pedersen FM, Brandt CJ, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Choledocholitiasis. Ugeskr Længer 1998; 160: 6526-9.
18. Schumacher B, Frieling T, Haussinger D, Niederau C. Endoscopic treatment of symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Hepato Gastroent 1998; 45: 672-6.
19. Schlup MM, Williams SM, Barbezat GO. ERCP; a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 48-52.
20. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Beneditti G, Chilovi F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10.