Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French

Lingua

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 339-351

  Jakubowicz, Celia ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Derivational complexity; French; SLI; Wh questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651365097     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bayer J. Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ 1996, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Belletti, A., 2006. Clefts and wh in situ: some notes. Paper presented at COST ACTION A33 Meeting in Lisbon, July 6-8.
3. Belletti A. Structures and Strategies 2009, Routledge, London.
4. Berwick R., Weinberg A. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition 1984, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bloom P. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 1990, 21:491-504.
6. Brown R. A First Language: The Early Stages 1973, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Brown R., Hanlon C. Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. Cognition and the Development of Language 1970, 11-53. Wiley, New York. J.R. Hayes (Ed.).
8. Bruening B. Differences between wh-scope-marking and wh-copy constructions in Passamaquoddy. Linguistic Inquiry 2006, 37:25-49.
9. Cheng L. On the Typology of Wh-Questions 1997, Garland Publishing, Inc, New York.
10. Cheng L., Rooryck J. Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax 2000, 3:1-19.
11. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures 1957, Mouton, The Hague.
12. Chomsky N. Bare phrase structure. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program 1995, 385-439. Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, MA. G. Webelhuth (Ed.).
13. Chomsky N. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale, A Life in Language 2001, 1-52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Kenstowicz (Ed.).
14. Chomsky N. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 2005, 36:1-22.
15. Chomsky, N., 2005b. On Phases. Unpublished Paper, MIT. Online available at: http://www.punksinscience.org/kleanthes/courses/MATERIALS/Chomsky_Phases.pdf.
16. Dayal V. Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics 1994, 2:137-170.
17. Dayal V. Scope marking: cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. Wh-Scope Marking 2000, 195-230. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. U. Lutz, G. Müller, A. von Stechow (Eds.).
18. Evers A. Two functional principles to "Move V" Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 1981, Vol. 19:96-110.
19. Fanselow G. Partial Wh- movement. The Blackwell Companion To Syntax (Vol III) 2006, 437-492. Blackwell, Malden, CA. M. Everaert, H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.).
20. Fanselow G., Cavar D. Remarks on the economy of pronunciation. Competition in Syntax 2001, 107-150. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. G. Müller, W. Sternefeld (Eds.).
21. Fanselow G., Mahajan A. Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives wh-copying and successive cyclicity. Wh-Scope Marking 2000, 195-230. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. U. Lutz, G. Müller, A. von Stechow (Eds.).
22. Felser C. Wh-copying, phases and successive cyclicity. Lingua 2004, 114:543-574.
23. Guéron J., Hoekstra T. T-Chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries. Constituent Structure 1988, 35-100. Foris, Dordrecht. A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, G. Cinque (Eds.).
24. Hamann C. Speculations about early syntax: the production of wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2006, 5:143-189.
25. Hulk A., Zuckerman S. The interaction between input and economy: acquiring optionality in French wh-questions. BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 2000, 438-449. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. S. Catherine Howell, S.A. Fish, T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.).
26. Jakubowicz C. Functional categories in (ab)normal language acquisition. The Process of Language Acquisition 2002, 165-202. Peter Lang Verlag, Berlin. I. Lasser (Ed.).
27. Jakubowicz C. Hypothèses psycholinguistiques sur la nature du déficit dysphasique. Les Dysphasies 2003, 23-70. Masson, Paris. Y. Brun, C. Gérard (Eds.).
28. Jakubowicz C. Is Movement costly? The grammar and the processor in language acquisition. Presentation JEL (Journée d'Etudes Linguistiques) 2004, University of Nantes.
29. Jakubowicz, C., 2005. The Language Faculty: (Ab)normal Development and Interface Constraints, Presentation at GALA 2005, Siena.
30. Jakubowicz C. Grammaire universelle et trouble spécifique du langage. Noam Chomsky 2007, 164-175. Les Editions de l'Herne, Paris. J. Bricmont, J. Franck (Eds.).
31. Jakubowicz C., Nash L. Functional categories and syntactic operations in (ab)normal language acquisition. Brain and Language 2001, 77:321-333.
32. Jakubowicz C., Strik N. Scope-marking strategies in the acquisition of long distance wh-questions in French and Dutch. Language and Speech 2008, 51:101-132.
33. Kato, M.A., 2003. The Interpretation and Derivation of wh-in-situ Constructions in Brazilian Portuguese, Presentation, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP).
34. Lumsden J., Lefebvre C. Predicate-cleft constructions and why they aren't what you might think. Linguistics 1990, 28:783-807.
35. Lutz U., Müller G., von Stechow A. Wh-Scope Marking 2000, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
36. Marantz A. Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistice Review 2005, 22:429-445.
37. Mathieu E. The mapping of form and interpretation: the case of optional wh-movement in French. Lingua 2004, 114:1090-1132.
38. McDaniel D. Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1989, 7:565-604.
39. Mufwene S. An issue on predicate-clefting: evidence from Atlantic creoles and African languages. Varia Creolica 1987, 71-89. Studienverlag Brockmeyer, Bochum. P. Maurer, T. Stolz (Eds.).
40. Newmeyer F.J. 'Interpretable' features and feature-driven A-bar movement. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 4 2003, 255-277. Presses de l'Université de Paris Sorbonne, Paris. C. Beyssade (Ed.).
41. Obenauer H.-G. Aspects de la Syntaxe A-Barre, Effets d'Intervention et Mouvements des Quantifieurs. Thèse d'Etat 1994, Université Paris 8.
42. Oiry M., Dermidache H. Evidence from L1 acquisition for the syntax of wh-scope marking in French. The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages 2006, 289-315. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. V. Torrens, L. Escobar (Eds.).
43. Pesetsky D., Torrego E. T-to-C movement: causes and consequences. Ken Hale: A Life in Language 2001, 355-426. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Kenstowicz (Ed.).
44. Pierce A. Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammar 1992, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
45. Platzack C. A visibility condition for the C-domain. Working Group in Scandinavian Syntax 1998, 61:53-100.
46. Reinhart T. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 1998, 6:29-56.
47. Rizzi L. Relativized Minimality 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Rizzi L. Remarks on early null subjects. The Acquisition of Syntax 2000, 269-292. Longman, London. M.A. Friedemann, L. Rizzi (Eds.).
49. Rizzi L. L'acquisition de la langue et de la faculté de langage. Noam Chomsky 2007, 147-157. Editions de l'Herne, Paris. J. Bricmont, J. Franck (Eds.).
50. Schippers, A., 2006a. Variation in the CP domain: long-distance dependencies in the Dutch dialects. Unpublished MS. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
51. Schippers, A., 2006b. Wie wat or waar. Unpublished MS. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
52. Soares C. The C-domain and the acquisition of European Portuguese: the case of wh-questions. Probus 2003, 15:147-176.
53. Soares, C., 2006. La Syntaxe de la Périphérie Gauche en Portugais Européen et son Acquisition. Doctoral thesis. University of Paris 8.
54. Strik N. L'acquisition des phrases interrogatives chez les enfants francophones. Psychologie Française 2006, 52:27-39.
55. Strik, N., 2008. Syntaxe et acquisition des phrases interrogative en français et en néerlandais: une étude comparative. Doctoral thesis. University of Paris 8.
56. Thornton, R., 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving: the acquisition of complex Wh-questions. PhD. University of Connecticut.
57. van Kampen, J., 1997. First Steps in Wh-movement. PhD. Universiteit Utrecht.
58. van Kampen J., Evers A. How greedy is the child? Long distance movement in small steps. ASCLD 3: Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition 1994 1995, 91-108. Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap, Amsterdam. M. Verrips, F. Wijnen (Eds.).
59. van Riemsdijk H. Correspondence effects and the empty category principle. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 1982, 12:1-20.
60. Veenstra, T., 2007. Information Structure in Creoles, Presentation at 2ème Colloque des Jeunes Chercheurs sur les Langues Créoles (JCLC), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris III.
61. Zuckerman S. The Acquisition of "Optional" Movement. Groningen Dissertation in Linguistics 34 Rijksuniversiteit 2001, University Library Groningen.