Differences between the whscope-marking and wh-copy constructions in Passamaquoddy

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 25-49

  Bruening, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algonquian; Comparatives; Partial movement; Passamaquoddy; Wh copying; Wh movement; Wh scope marking

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645782973     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438906775321166     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1-56.
2. Beck, Sigrid, and Stephen Berman. 2000. Wh-scope marking: Direct vs. indirect dependency. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, 17-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Branigan, Phil, and Marguerite MacKenzie. 2002, Altruism, A-movement, and object agreement in Innuaimun. Linguistic Inquiry 33:385-407.
4. Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
5. Bruening, Benjamin. 2004. Two types of wh-scope marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:229-305.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991. Plains Cree morphosyntax. New York: Garland.
10. Dayal, Veneeta. 1994. Scope marking as indirect wh dependency, Natural Language Semantics 2:137-170.
11. Dayal, Veneeta. 2000. Scope marking: Cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, 157-193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Du Plessis, Hans. 1977. Wh-movement in Afrikaans. Linguistic Inquiry 8:723-726.
13. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Damir Cavar. 2001. Remarks on the economy of pronunciation. In Competition in syntax, ed. by Gereon Müller and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 107-150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Anoop Mahajan. 2000. Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying, and successive cyclicity. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, 195-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Felser, Claudia. 2004. Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114:543-574.
16. Frantz, Donald G. 1978. Copying from complements in Blackfoot. In Linguistic studies of native Canada, ed. by Eung-Do Cook and Jonathan Kaye, 89-109. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
17. Frantz, Donald G. 1980. Ascensions to subject in Blackfoot. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Bruce R. Caron, Meredith A. B. Hoffman, Marilyn Silva, and Jeanne van Oosten, 293-299. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
18. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111-176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
19. Herburger, Elena. 1994. A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston.
20. Hiemstra, Inge. 1986. Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian. North- Western European Language Evolution 8:97-110.
21. Hinrichs, Erhard, and Tsuneko Nakazawa. 2000. The was-w construction in German: A case study in type-coercion. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, ed. by Dan Flickinger and Andreas Kathol, 147-165. On-line publication available at http:// cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/1/hpsg00-toc.html.
22. Höhle, Tilman. 2000. The w-. . . w-construction: Appositive or scope indicating? In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, 249-270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Horvath, Julia. 1997. The status of ' 'WH-expletives" and the partial WH-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15:509-572.
24. Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20:553-621.
25. Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. On the proper treatment of "expletive wh" in Hindi. Lingua 112:501-540.
26. Lutz, Uli, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, eds. 2000. Wn-scope marking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Massam, Diane. 1985. Case theory and the Projection Principle. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
28. McDaniel, Dana. 1986. Conditions on wh-chains. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
29. McDaniel, Dana. 1989. Partial and multiple WH-movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7: 565-604.
30. McDaniel, Dana, Bonnie Chiu, and Thomas L. Maxfield. 1995. Parameters for WH-movement types: Evidence from child English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13:709-753.
31. Mitchell, Lewis. 1976a. Espons (Raccoon). Indian Township, Maine: Wabnaki Bilingual Education Program. Edited and updated version of text in J. D. Prince (1921). Passamaquoddy texts. Volume X of the Publications of the American Ethnological Society.
32. Mitchell, Lewis. 1976b. Koluskap nekotok skitkomiq (When Koluskap left the earth). Indian Township, Maine: Wabnaki Bilingual Education Program. Edited and updated version of text in J. D. Prince (1921). Passamaquoddy texts. Volume X of the Publications of the American Ethnological Society.
33. Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1984. On the identification of empty categories. The Linguistic Review 4:153-202.
34. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
35. Reis, Marga. 2000. On the parenthetical features of German was ... w constructions and how to account for them. In Wh-scope marking, ed. by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller, and Arnim von Stechow, 359-407. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1983. Correspondence effects and the Empty Category Principle. In Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition, ed. by Yukio Otsu et al., 5-16. Tokyo: Editorial Committee.
37. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
38. Thornton, Rosalind. 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
39. Thornton, Rosalind. 1995. Referentiality and wh-movement in child English: Juvenile d-linkuency. Language Acquisition 4:139-175.