Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 121-126

  Rao, Harsha Laxmana ^a   Kumar, Addepalli Uday ^a   Kumar, Anjul ^a   Chary, Swathi ^a   Senthil, Sirisha ^a   Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna ^a   Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

agreement; central corneal thickness; repeatability; spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORNEA THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND PACHYMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; COHORT STUDIES; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 78651357244     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e16c65     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Belin MW, Khachikian SS. New devices and clinical implications for measuring corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34: 729-731.
2. Dueker DK, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Corneal thickness measurement in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1779-1787.
3. Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: A new era for ophthalmic diagnosis? Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:551-557.
4. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4290-4296.
5. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4893-4897.
6. Gupta V, Gupta P, Singh R, et al. Spectral-domain Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography is better than time-domain Stratus optical coherence tomography for evaluation of macular pathologic features in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:1018-1022.
7. Menke MN, Knecht P, Sturm V, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using 3D Fourier-domain OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5386-5391.
8. Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:775-781.
9. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: A variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1257-1263.
10. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1264-1270.
11. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1271-1277.
12. Nassif NA, Cense B, Park BH, et al. In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve [serial online]. Opt Express. 2004;12:367-376. Available at: Http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-12-3-367. Accessed June 2, 2009.
13. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan VJ, Ko TH, et al. Ultrahigh resolution, highspeed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation [serial online]. Opt Express. 2004;12:2404-2422. Available at: Http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI= OPEX-12-11-2404. Accessed June 2, 2004.
14. Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:774-778.
15. Li Y, Shekhar R, Huang D. Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:792-799.
16. Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT Jr. On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;163:307-317.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;313:744.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ. 1996;313:106.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160.
20. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:174-177.
21. Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ. Regional repeatability measures of corneal thickness: Orbscan II and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:52-58.
22. Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K, et al. Corneal thickness measurements: Scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1313-1318.
23. Leung DY, Lam DK, Yeung BY, et al. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34:751-754.
24. Fam HB, Lim KL, Reinstein DZ. Orbscan global pachymetry: Analysis of repeated measures. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:1047-1053.
25. Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ. Repeatability of central corneal thickness measures by Orbscan pachymetry for right and left eyes. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:20-25.
26. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1791-1795. (Pubitemid 34587022)
27. Li H, Leung CK, Wong L, et al. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and Visante optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:796-801.
28. Mohamed S, Lee GK, Rao SK. Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5499-5504.
29. Prakash G, Agarwal A, Jacob S, et al. Comparison of Fourier-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography for assessment of corneal thickness and intersession repeatability. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148: 282-290.
30. Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Auffarth GU. Reliability of Orbscan II topography measurements in relation to refractive status. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1607-1613.
31. Lattimore MR Jr, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S, et al. Orbscan pachymetry: Implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology. 1999;109:977-981.
32. Wylegala E, Teper S, Nowinska AK, et al. Anterior segment imaging: Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus time-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1410-1414.
33. Fukuda S, Kawana K, Yasuno Y, et al. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 882-889.
34. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.
35. Fakhry MA, Artola A, Belda JI, et al. Comparison of corneal pachymetry using ultrasound and Orbscan II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:248-252.
36. Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, et al. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1272-1277.
37. Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:937-941.
38. Li EY, Mohamed S, Leung CK, et al. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: Ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1842-1847.
39. Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography v/s ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:228-232.
40. Zhao PS, Wong TY, Wong WL, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143: 1047-1049.
41. Rüfer F, Schröder A, Bader C, et al. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness: Determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007;26:1-5.
42. Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, et al. Corneal thickness in a population-based, cross-sectional study: The Tehran Eye Study. Cornea. 2009;28:395-400.
43. Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ. Evidence for a relative thinning of the peripheral cornea with age in white European subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4121-4128.
44. Moezzi AR, Sin S, Simpson TL. Novel pachometry calibration. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:E366-E371.
45. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-408.