The legal regime of the Mekong River: A look back and some proposals for the way ahead

Water Policy

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 798-821

  Bearden, Bennett L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

1995 mekong agreement; International water law and policy; Mekong legal regime; Mekong river; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651354312     PISSN: 13667017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2009.060     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Affeltranger, B. (2005). Intra-basin conflict resolution in the Mekong basin: Is a reconciliation of water values possible? International workshop on the value of water: Different approaches in transboundary water management (10-11 March 2005), Federal Republic of Germany, Koblenz, pp. 53-56.
2. Bakker, K. (1999). The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography, 18(2), 209-232.
3. Beyerlin, U. (1996). The concept of sustainable development. In Enforcing Environmental Standards: Economic Mechanisms as Viable Means? Wolfrum, R. (ed.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 95-121.
4. Birnie, P. W. & Boyle, A. E. (2002). International Law and the Environment, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 84-97.
5. Browder, G. (1998). Negotiating an international regime for water allocation in the Mekong River Basin (unpublished PhD Dissertation). Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
6. Browder, G. & Ortolano, L. (2000). The evolution of an international water resources management regime in the Mekong river basin. Natural Resources Journal, 40(3), 499-531.
7. Carrard, N. (2005). Mainstream or marginal? Transboundary tributaries and the Mekong Agreement. Eighth international river symposium: Water and food security-Rivers in the global context. Brisbane, Australia.
8. Chaipipat, K. (1992). Strong distrust delays cooperation on Mekong. The Nation (27 March 1992). Bangkok, Thailand.
9. Current Status of UN Watercourses Convention (2009). Available at http://assets.panda.org/downloads/ un-watercourses-convention-ratification- history.pdf (accessed 17 April 2009).
10. Dinar, A., Dinar, S., McCaffrey, S. & McKinney, D. (2007). Bridges over water: Understanding transboundary water conflict, negotiation and cooperation. World Scientific Series on Energy and Resource Economics: Volume 3. World Scientific Publishing Co., London, UK.
11. Duong, W. N. (2007). Following the path of oil: The law of the sea or realpolitik-what good does law do in the South China Sea territorial conflicts? Fordham International Law Journal, 30(4), 1098-1205.
12. Elhance, A. P. (1999). Hydro-politics in the 3rd World: Conflict and Cooperation in International River Basins. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 216-219.
13. Elleman, B. (1996). Sino-Soviet relations and the February 1979 Sino-Vietnamese conflict; draft paper (20 April 1996). 1996 Vietnam Symposium: After the Cold War-Reassessing Vietnam (18-20 April 1996). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
14. Fravel, M. T. (2005). Regime insecurity and international cooperation: Exploring China's compromises in territorial disputes. International Security, 30(2), 46-83.
15. Freeman, J. D. (2009). Taming the Mekong: The possibilities and pitfalls of a Mekong joint energy development agreement. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 10(2), 453-481.
16. Golitzen, K. G. (ed.) (2005). The Niger River-A Vision for Sustainable Management. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 62 pp.
17. Gottesman, E. (2003). Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge: Inside the Politics of Nation Building. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, pp. 12-13.
18. Gupta, A. (2007). The Mekong river: morphology, evolution, management. In Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management. Gupta, A. (ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, pp. 435-455.
19. Gupta, A. & Liew, S. C. (2007). The Mekong from satellite imagery. Geomorphology, 85(3/4), 259-274.
20. Handley, P. & Hiebert, M. (1992). Hostile undercurrents: Dispute deepens over use of Mekong river water. Far East Economic Review, 16 (2 April 1992).
21. Hirsch, P. (1999). Beyond the nation state: Natural resource conflict and 'national interest' in Mekong hydropower development. Golden Gate University Law Review, 29(3), 399-414.
22. Hirsch, P. & Wyatt, A. (2004). Negotiating local livelihoods: Scales of conflict in the Se San River Basin. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 45(1), 51-68.
23. Hirsch, P., Jensen, K. M., Boer, B., Carrard, N., FitzGerald, S. & Lyster, R. (2006). National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Australian Mekong Resources Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
24. Hori, H. (2000). The Mekong: Environment and Development. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan.
25. Interim Mekong Committee (1991). 1991 Interim Mekong Committee Annual Report. Bangkok, Thailand.
26. International Court of Justice (ICJ) (1997). Case concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment of 25 Sept. 1997, 1997 ICJ 7, reprinted in 37 ILM 162 (1998). Also available on the Court's website at: http://www.icj-cjj.org (accessed 17 April 2009).
27. International Rivers Network (2003). Mekong Watch-Lancang-Mekong: A River of Controversy. Kate, L. (ed.). Berkeley, California, USA.
28. International Rivers Network (2008). Mekong mainstream dams. Available at: http://internationalrivers.org/en/southeast-asia/ mekong-mainstream-dams (accessed 17 April 2009).
29. Jacobs, J. W. (1994). Toward sustainability in lower Mekong river basin development. Water International, 19(1), 43-51.
30. Khanna, P. (2008). The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. Random House, New York, USA, pp. 294-295.
31. Khruschev Report (1961). Khruschev Report on Moscow Conference of Representatives of Communist and Workers Parties (1961). Folder 4, President's Office Files Box 126(a), (6 January 1961). John F. Kennedy Library, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
32. Lebel, L. & Garden, P. (2008). Deliberation, negotiation and scale in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. In Adaptive and Integrated Water Management. Pahl-Wostl, C., Kabat, P. & Möltgen, J. (eds). Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 210-216.
33. Lerner, M. (2002). Dangerous waters: Violations of international law and hydropower development along the Sesan River. Background Briefing 4. National Sesan River Protection Network Workshop (27 November 2002). Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
34. Lerner, M. A. (2003). Dangerous waters: Violations of international law and hydropower development along the Sesan River (unpublished manuscript). Oxfam, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
35. Loures, F. (2009). Email communiqué from Flavia Loures, WWF International Water Law and Policy Senior Program Officer, to author (April 4, 2009, 11:04 a.m. CST) (on file with author).
36. Loures, F. & Dellapenna, J. (2007). Forthcoming developments in international groundwater law: Proposals for the way ahead. Water 21 (August 2007), 58-62.
37. Makim, A. (2002). The changing face of Mekong resource politics in the post-cold war era: Re-negotiating arrangements for water resource management in the Lower Mekong River Basin (1991-1995). Working Paper No. 6, Australian Mekong Resource Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
38. McCaffrey, S. C. (1996). The Harmon Doctrine one hundred years later: Buried, not praised. Natural Resources Journal, 36(3), 549-590.
39. McCaffrey, S. C. (2001a). International water law for the 21st century: The contribution of the U.N. convention. Water Resources Update, 118, 11-19.
40. McCaffrey, S. C. (2001b). The contribution of the UN convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 1(3/4), 250-263.
41. McCaffrey, S. C. (2007). The Law of International Watercourses, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
42. McCaffrey, S. (forthcoming 2010). Establishing rights: The law of international waters. In Sharing Water, Sharing Benefits- Working Towards Effective Transboundary Water Resources Management: A Graduate/Professional Skills-Building Workbook. Wolf, A. T. (ed.). Adapted from the World Bank International Waters Course. UNESCO and The World Bank, Paris and Washington, DC.
43. McCaffrey, S. C. & Weber, G. S. (2005). Guidebook for Policy and Legislative Development on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater Resources. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya.
44. Mekong Committee (1973). 1973 Mekong Committee Annual Report. Bangkok, Thailand.
45. Mekong Committee (1989). The Mekong Committee: A historical account (1957-1989). Mekong Committee Secretariat, Bangkok, Thailand.
46. Mekong Sources (2004). Mekong: The mother of waters: 1. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (on file with author).
47. Molle, F. & Floch, P. (2007). Water, poverty and the governance of mega projects: The Thai "Water Grid." International Water Management Institute Working Paper. Colombo, Sri Lanka.
48. Molle, F., Floch, P., Promphakping, B. & Blake, D. (2009a). The "Greening of Isan": Politics, ideology, and irrigation development in the northeast of Thailand. In Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance. Molle, F., Foran, T. & Kakonen, M. (eds). Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK.
49. Molle, F., Lebel, L. & Foran, T. (2009b). Contested Mekong waterscapes: Where to next? Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance. Molle, F., Foran, T. & Kakonen, M. (eds). Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK.
50. MRC (1995). Mekong River Commission: Towards sustainable development. Annual Report. Bangkok, Thailand.
51. MRC (1999). Public participation in the context of the MRC. Available at: http://www.mrcmekong.org/download/programmes/ Public-Participation-Mrc-context. pdf (accessed 17 April 2009).
52. MRC (2002). Mekong News: Newsletter of the Mekong River Commission. 1 2002(2: April-June). Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
53. MRC (2005). Overview of the hydrology of the Mekong Basin. Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
54. MRC (2006). Annual Report 2006. Lao People's Democratic Republic, Vientiane, pp. 16-17.
55. MRC (2008a). The Story of Mekong Cooperation. Available at: http://www.mrcmekong.org/about-mrc.htm#story (accessed 17 April 2009).
56. MRC (2008b). Letter from MRC Secretariat CEO Jeremy Bird to Khun Premrudee, Requests from Mekong Civil Society (11 April 2008). Available at: http://www.terraper.org/articles/MRCS%20CEO%20Response%20to%20TERRA.pdf (accessed 17 April 2009).
57. MRC (2008c). Mekong News: Newsletter of the Mekong River Commission: 6. 2008(3): (July-October). Lao People's Democratic Republic, Vientiane.
58. Nakayama, M. (1999). Aspects behind differences in two agreements adopted by riparian countries of the lower Mekong river basin. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 1(3), 293-308.
59. Osborne, M. (2004). River at risk: The Mekong and the water politics of China and Southeast Asia. Lowy Institute for International Policy Paper 02. Longueville Media, New South Wales, Australia.
60. Pantulu, V. R. (1986). The Mekong river system. In The Ecology of River Systems. Davies, B. R. & Walker, K. F. (eds). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 695-719.
61. Petkova, E., & Veit, P. (2000). Environmental accountability beyond the nation-state: The implications of the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Governance Note. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
62. Phillips, D., Daoudy, M., McCaffrey, S., Ojendal, J. & Turton, A. (2006). Trans- boundary water co-operation as a tool for conflict prevention and broader benefit sharing. Sweden Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
63. Pichyakorn, B. (2002). Sustainable development and international watercourse agreements: The Mekong and the Rhine. IUCN Draft Paper (30 June 2002).
64. Pichyakorn, B. (2005). International watercourses law: The experience of the Mekong river basin. In International Watercourses Law for the 21st Century: The Case of the River Ganges Basin. Subedi, S. P. (ed.). Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot, Hampshire, UK, pp. 167-192.
65. Rieu-Clarke, A. (2007). Entry into force of the 1997 UN watercourses convention: Barriers, benefits and prospects. Water 21 (December 2007), 12-16.
66. Rix, A. S. (2003). The Mekong river basin: A resource at the cross-roads of sustainable development. Temple Environmental Law & Technology Journal, 21(2), 103-129.
67. Roy, D. (1994). Hegemon on the horizon? China's threat to East Asian security. International Security, 19(1), 149-168.
68. Rutkow, E., Crider, C. & Giannini, T. (2005). Down River: The consequences of Vietnam's Se San River dams on life in Cambodia and their meaning in international law. NGO Forum on Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
69. Sands, P. (2003). Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 252-266.
70. Segal, G. (1996). East Asia and the constrainment of China. International Security, 20(4), 107-135.
71. Sneddon, C. & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography, 25(2), 181-202.
72. Snidvongs, A. & Teng, S. (2006). Mekong River. Global International Waters Assessment Regional Assessment (GIWA) 55. Available at: http://www.unep.org/dewa/giwa/publications/r55.asp (accessed 17 April 2009).
73. TERRA (2008). Letter from Premrudee Daoroung, Director, TERRA, to MRC Secretariat CEO Jeremy Bird, re requests from Mekong civil society to the new MRC CEO (27 March 2008). Available at: http://www.terraper.org/articles/ Regional%20letter%20to%20MRC.pdf (accessed 17 April 2009).
74. Tesli, A. & Husby, S. R. (1999). EIA in a transboundary context: Principles and challenges for a coordinated nordic application of the Espoo convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19(1), 57-84.
75. Toda, O., Tanji, H., Somura, H., Higuchi, K. & Yoshida, K. (2004). Evaluation of tributaries contribution in the Mekong River Basin during rainy and dry season. Paper presented at the Second Conference of the Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resources, Singapore 5-9 July, 2004.
76. UN (1997). UN General Assembly Resolution 51/229 dated 21 May 1997 and UN General Assembly Press Release GA/9248. Available at: http://assets.panda.org/ downloads/un-watercourses-convention-voting-records.pdf (accessed 17 April 2009).
77. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2002). Atlas of International Freshwater Agreements, Nairobi, Kenya, p. 6.
78. Vick, M. J. (2006). The Senegal river basin: A retrospective and prospective look at the legal regime. Natural Resources Journal, 46(1), 211-243.
79. Vick, M. J. (2009). Water Allocation: Local to International (unpublished JSD Dissertation). McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, Sacramento, California, USA.
80. White, R. (1995). The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River. Hill & Wang, New York, USA.
81. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B. & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29-60.
82. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, USA.
83. WWF (2007). UN Freshwater Agreements Project: News Update: 2. No. 01. Washington, DC, USA.
84. WWF (2009). UN Freshwater Agreements Project: News Update: 3. No. 07. Washington, DC, USA.
85. Wyatt, A. B. & Baird, I. G. (2007). Transboundary impact assessment in the Sesan river basin: The case of the Yali Falls Dam. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23(3), 427-442.
86. Zeitoun, M. & Warner, J. (2006). Hydo-hegemony: A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435-460.
87. Zhao, M. & Schell, O. (2008). Tibet: Plateau in Peril. World Policy Journal, 25(3), 171-180.