Omics in aquatic toxicology: Not just another microarray

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 263-264

  Martyniuk, C J ^a   Griffitt, R ^b   Denslow, N D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY; BIODIVERSITY; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; OMIC TECHNOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEOMICS; PYROSEQUENCING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TOXICOGENETICS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; HYDROBIOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; TOXICOGENETICS;

EID: 78651349421     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.428     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Neumann NF, Galvez F. 2002. DNA microarrays and toxicogenomics: applications for ecotoxicology? Biotechnol Adv 20: 391-419.
2. Miracle AL, Toth GP, Lattier DL. 2003. The path from molecular indicators of exposure to describing dynamic biological systems in an aquatic organism: microarrays and the fathead minnow. Ecotoxicology 12: 457-62.
3. Larkin P, Folmar LC, Hemmer MJ, Poston AJ, Lee HS, Denslow ND. 2002. Array technology as a tool to monitor exposure of fish to xenoestrogens. Mar Environ Res 54: 395-9.
4. Van Aggelen G, Ankley GT, Baldwin WS, Bearden DW, Benson WH, Chipman JK, Collette TW, Craft JA, Denslow ND, Embry MR, Falciani F, George SG, Helbing CC, Hoekstra PF, Iguchi T, Kagami Y, Katsiadaki I, Kille P, Liu L, Lord PG, McIntyre T, O'Neill A, Osachoff H, Perkins EJ, Santos EM, Skirrow RC, Snape JR, Tyler CR, Versteeg D, Viant MR, Volz DC, Williams TD, Yu L. 2010. Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: hurdles, achievements, and future outlook. Environ Health Perspect 118: 1-5.
5. Martyniuk CJ, Denslow ND. 2009. Towards functional genomics in fish using quantitative proteomics. Gen Comp Endocrinol 164: 135-41.
6. De Wit M, Keil D, Remmerie N, van der Ven K, van den Brandhof EJ, Knapen D, Witters E, De Coen W. 2008. Molecular targets of TBBPA in zebrafish analysed through integration of genomic and proteomic approaches. Chemosphere 74: 96-105.
7. Martyniuk CJ, Alvarez S, McClung S, Villeneuve DL, Ankley GT, Denslow ND. 2009. Quantitative proteomic profiles of androgen receptor signaling in the liver of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J. Proteome Res. 8: 2186-200.