Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality:

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 49-56

  Oates, Jennifer ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditory perceptual evaluation; Disordered voice quality; Rating scales

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; EVALUATION; GOLD STANDARD; HEARING; LARYNX DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VALIDITY; VOICE; DYSPHONIA; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 59549089430     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000200768     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Behrman A: Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. J Voice 2005; 19: 454-469.
2. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, Mackenzie K, Steen N, Wilson JA: The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 261: 429-434.
3. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erma A, Berke GS: Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 21-40.
4. De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PH, Wuyts F, Lambrechts L: The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1996; 50: 283-291.
5. Ma EP, Yiu EM: Mutiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. J Voice 2006; 20: 380-390.
6. Kent RD: Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1996; 5: 7-23.
7. Eadie TL, Baylor CR: The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgements of dysphonic voice. J Voice 2006; 20: 527-544.
8. Shrivastav R: The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality. J Voice 2003; 17: 502-512.
9. Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM, Nandur V: Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 323-335.
10. Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH: Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice 1999; 13: 508-517.
11. Hirano M: Clinical Examination of Voice. New York, Springer, 1981, pp 83-84.
12. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Rockville Pike, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2002.
13. Hammarberg B, Gauffin J: Perceptual and acoustic correlates of quality differences in pathological voices as related to physiological aspects; in Fujimura O, Hirano M: Vocal Fold Physiology. Voice Quality Control. San Diego, Singular, 1995, pp 283-303.
14. Oates J, Russell A: Learning voice analysis using an interactive multi-media package: development and preliminary evaluation. J Voice 1998; 12: 500-512.
15. Fex S: Perceptual evaluation. J Voice 1992; 6: 155-158.
16. De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C: Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual ratings of voice quality. J Voice 1997; 11: 74-80.
17. Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Wedin L: Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngol 1980; 90: 441-451.
18. Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de Moor GM, Wieneke GH: Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr 1993; 45: 76-83.
19. Chan MK, Yiu EM: A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naïve listeners. J Voice 2006; 20: 229-241.
20. Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childes JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT: Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice 2007; 21: 576-590.
21. Portney LG, Watkins MP: Foundations of Clinical Research, ed 2. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall Health, 2000.
22. Hammarberg B: Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia; thesis. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 1986.
23. Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J: Acoustic and perceptual analysis of vocal dysfunction. J Phonet 1986; 14: 533-547.
24. Hillenbrand J, Houde RA: Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 311-321.
25. Hillman RE, Montgomery WW, Zeitels SM: Appropriate use of objective measures of vocal function in the multidisciplinary management of voice disorders. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 5: 172-175.
26. Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK, Vesselinov R: Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006; 58: 274-288.
27. Holmberg EB, Hillman RE, Perkell JS, Gress C: Relationships between intra-speaker variation in aerodynamic measures of voice production and variation in SPL across repeated recordings. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 484-495.
28. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Antoñanzas-Barroso N: Measures of the glottal source spectrum. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50: 595-610.
29. Carson CP, Ingrisano DR, Eggleston KD: The effect of noise on computer-aided measures of voice: a comparison of CSpeechSP and the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program software using the CSL 4300B module and Multi-Speech for Windows. J Voice 2003; 17: 12-20.
30. Tize I: Workshop on acoustic voice analysis. Denver, National Center for Voice and Speech, 1995.
31. Holmberg EB, Doyle P, Perkell JS, Hammarberg B, Hillman RE: Aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements of patients with vocal nodules: variation in baseline and changes across voice therapy. J Voice 2003; 17: 269-282.
32. Revis J, Giovanni A, Wuyts F, Triglia JM: Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1999; 51: 108-116.
33. Wolfe V, Cornell R, Fitch J: Sentence/vowel correlation in the evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice 1995; 9: 297-303.
34. Yiu EM: Limitations of perturbation measures in clinical acoustic voice analysis. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear 1999; 4: 155-166.
35. Kempster GB, Kistler DJ, Hillenbrand J: Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 534-543.
36. Yamaguchi H, Shrivastav R, Andrews ML, Niimi S: A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2003; 55: 147-157.
37. Oates J, Bain B, Davis P, Chapman J, Kenny D: Development of an auditory-perceptual rating instrument for the operatic singing voice. J Voice 2006; 20: 71-81.
38. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR: Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 1867-1876.
39. Laver J, Wirz S, Mackenzie J, Hiller S: A Perceptual Protocol for the Analysis of Vocal Profiles (work in progress). Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, 1981, pp 265-280.
40. Wolfe V, Martin D: Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Commun Dis 1997; 30: 403-416.
41. Oates J: The evidence base for the management of individuals with voice disorders; in Reilly S, Douglas J, Oates J (eds): Evidence- Based Practice in Speech Pathology. London, Whurr, 2004, pp 110-139.
42. Colton RH, Casper JK, Leonard R: Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Basis for Diagnosis and Treatment, ed 3. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006, pp 16-17.
43. Dejonckere PH, Lebacq J: Acoustic, perceptual, aerodynamic and anatomical correlations in voice pathology. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1996; 58: 326-332.
44. Marks LE, Gescheider GA: Psychophysical scaling; in Wixted J (ed): Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology, ed 3. New York, John Wiley, 2002, pp 91-138.
45. Marks LE, Algom D: Psychophysical scaling; in Birnbaum MH (ed): Measurement, Judgement, and Decision Making. San Diego, Academic Press, 1998, pp 81-178.
46. Houtsma AJM: Pitch perception; in Moore BCJ (ed): Hearing. San Diego, Academic Press, 1995, pp 267-295.
47. Zwicker E, Fastl H: Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Berlin, Springer, 1999.
48. Kent RD, Ball MJ: Voice Quality Measurement. San Diego, Singular, 2000.
49. Laver J: The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.
50. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J: Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 2560-2566.
51. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR: Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 2201-2211.
52. Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM: Some difference limens for the perception of breathiness. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120: 416-422.
53. Eysholdt U, Tigges M, Wittenberg T, Proschel U: Direct evaluation of high-speed recordings of vocal fold vibrations. Folia Phoniatr Logoped 1996; 48: 163-170.
54. Zhang Y, Jiang JJ: Chaotic vibrations of a vocal fold model with a unilateral polyp. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 1266-1269.
55. Yan Y, Damrose E, Bless D: Functional analysis of voice using simultaneous high-speed imaging and acoustic recordings. J Voice 2007; 21: 604-616.
56. Bonilha HS, Deliyski DD: Period and glottal width irregularities in vocally normal speakers. J Voice 2008; 22: 699-708.
57. Deliyski DD, Petrushev PP, Bonilha HS, Gerlach TT, Martin-Harris B, Hillman RE: Clinical implementation of laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy: challenges and evolution. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2008; 60: 33-44.
58. švec JG, šram F, Schutte HK: Videokymography in voice disorders: what to look for? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 116: 172-180.
59. Gorham-Rowan MM, Laures-Gore J: Acoustic-perceptual correlates of voice quality in elderly men and women. J Commun Disord 2006; 39: 171-184.
60. Shrivastav R, Sapienza CM: Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 2217-2224.
61. Mehta DD, Hillman RE: Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16: 211-215.
62. Martin DP, Wolfe VI: Effects of perceptual training based upon synthesized voice signals. Percept Motor Skills 1996; 83: 1291-1298.
63. Oates J, Russell A: A Sound Judgement. Melbourne, La Trobe University, 2003.
64. Orlikoff RF, Dejonckere PH, Dembowski J, Fitch J, Gelfer MP, Gerratt BR, et al: The perceived role of voice perception in clinical practice. Phonoscope 1999; 2: 89-106.
65. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, Newman CW: The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6: 66-70.
66. Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G: Validation of an instrument to measure Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL). J Voice 1999; 13: 557-569.
67. Deary IJ, Wilson JA, Carding PN, Mackenzie K: VoiSS: a patient-derived voice symptom scale. J Psychosom Res 2003; 54: 483-489.
68. Ma EP, Yiu EM: Voice activity and participation profile: assessing the impact of voice disorders on daily activities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 511-524.
69. Murry T, Medrado R, Hogikyan ND, Aviv JE: The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures. J Voice 2004; 18: 183-192.