Usability evaluation of the interactive personal patient profile-prostate decision support system with African American men

Journal of the National Medical Association

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 290-302

  Jaja, Cheedy ^a   Pares Avila, Jose ^b   Wolpin, Seth ^c   Berry, Donna ^d  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Denny Murphy Clinic ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

African Americans; Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs; Men's health; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEN'S HEALTH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 77951844981     PISSN: 00279684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30601-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Cancer Society. Prostate Cancer Fact Sheet (2007). http://www.cancer.org/docroot/home/index.asp. Accessed February 8, 2009.
2. Cox J, Amling CL. Current decision-making in prostate cancer therapy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:275-278. (Pubitemid 351489378)
3. Bermejo C, Kristal AR, Zeliadt SB, et al. Localized prostate cancer: quality of life meet Whitmore's legacy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1348-1349. (Pubitemid 39406160)
4. Potosky AL, Davis W, Hoffman R, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcome study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1358-1367. (Pubitemid 39406169)
5. Zeliadt SB, Ramsey SD, Penson, DF, et al. Why do men choose one treatment over another? A review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2006;106:1865-1874.
6. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Wiens KP, et al. Comparing a generic and individualized information decision support intervention for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30:7-15.
7. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Woods NF, et al. Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: influence of personal factors. Urol Oncol. 2003;21:93-100.
8. Rae LJ, Lober WB, Wolpin SE, et al. Acceptability of an Internet treatment decision support system program. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;1091.
9. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics 2006. Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106-130.
10. Collin SM, Martin RM, Metcalfe C, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:445452.
11. Aronson W, Freedland SJ. Can we lower the mortality rate of black men with prostate cancer? J Urol. 2000;163:150-155.
12. Powell IJ. Prostate cancer in the African-American: Is this a different disease? Sem Urol Oncol. 1998;16:221-226.
13. Etzioni R, Berry KM, Legler JM, et al. Prostate-specific antigen testing in black and white men: An analysis of Medicare claims from 1991-1998. Urology. 2002;59:251-255.
14. Gilligan T, Wang P, Levin R, et al. Racial differences in screening for prostate cancer in the elderly. Arch of Intern Med. 2004;164:1858-1864. (Pubitemid 39274355)
15. Steele CB, Miller DS, Maylahn C, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices among older men regarding prostate cancer. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1595-1600.
16. Chan EC, Sulmasy DP. What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent? Am J Med. 1998;105:266-274.
17. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Russell KJ, et al. Factors That Predict Treatment Choice and Satisfaction with the Decision in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2006;5:219-226. (Pubitemid 46190384)
18. Wulff J. Usability Testing of the Personal Patient Profile Prostate [M Nurs thesis] Washington, DC: Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington; 2005.
19. Berry DL, Wolpin SE, Lober WB, et al. Actual use and perceived usefulness of a web-based, decision support program for men with prostate cancer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:781-782.
20. Berry D, Lober W, Davison B, Ellis W, et al. Decisional Conflict and Preparation for Decision Making after Using the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate P4. Paper presented at Society of Medical Decision Making Meeting; October 14-18, 2006; Cambridge, MA.
21. Kushniruk A, Patel V. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Informat. 2004;37:56-76. (Pubitemid 38338551)
22. Daniels J, Fels S, Kushniruk A, et al. A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21:323-330. (Pubitemid 47399699)
23. Virzi RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors. 1992;34:457-468.
24. Peute LWP, Jasper MWM. The Significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:157-168.
25. Fonda SJ. Paulsen CA, Perkins J, et al. Usability Test of an Internet-Based Informatics Tool for Diabetes Care Providers: The Comprehensive Diabetes Management Program. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10:16-24.
26. Fonteyn M, Fisher A. Use of think aloud method to study nurses' reasoning and decision making in clinical practice settings. J Neurosci Nurs. 1995;27:124-128.
27. Fonteyn M, Kuipers B, Grobe, SJ. A description of the use of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res. 1993;3:430-441.
28. Corcoran S, Moreland H. Thinking aloud as a strategy to improve clinical decision making. Heart Lung. 1988;17:463-468.
29. McAllister M, Billett S, Moyle W, et al. Use of a think-aloud procedure to explore the relationship between clinical reasoning and solution-focused training in self-harm for emergency nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009;16:121-128.
30. Newell A, Simon HA: Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall; 1972.
31. Van Someren MW, Burnard YF, Sandberg JAC. The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modeling Cognitive Processes. San Diego, CA; Academic Press; 1994.
32. O'Conner AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;1:1-100.
33. Mitchell C. Introduction to Usability Testing. Austin, TX: University of Texas Libraries 2005. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/dls/testing/index.html. Accessed February 5, 2009.