Obstacle crossing with lower visual field restriction: Shifts in strategy

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 55-62

  Jansen, Sander E M ^a,b   Toet, Alexander ^a   Werkhoven, Peter J ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

lower visual field restriction; motion capture; obstacle crossing; strategy shifts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SAFETY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SAFETY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 78651299003     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2010.533593     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alfano, P., & Michel, G. (1990). Restricting the field of view: Perceptual and performance effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(1), 35-45.
2. Amblard, B., & Carblanc, A. (1980). Role of foveal and peripheral visual information inmaintenance of postural equilibrium in man. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 903-912.
3. Anderson, F., & Pandy, M. (2001). Dynamic optimization of human walking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123, 381-390.
4. Chen, H., Ashton-Miller, J., Alexander, N., & Schultz, A. (1991). Stepping over obstacles: Gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology, 46, M196-M203.
5. Chou, L., & Draganich, L. (1997). Stepping over an obstacle increases the motions and moments of the joints of the trailing limb in young adults. Journal of Biomechanics, 30, 331-337.
6. Chou, L., & Draganich, L. (1998). Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping. Journal of Biomechanics, 31, 685-691.
7. Dolezal, H. (1982). Living in a world transformed. New York, NY: Academic Press.
8. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Graci, V., Elliott, D., & Buckley, J. (2009). Peripheral visual cues affect minimum-foot-clearance during overground locomotion. Gait & Posture, 30, 370-374.
10. Graci, V., Elliott, D., & Buckley, J. (2010). Utility of peripheral visual cues in planning and controlling adaptive gait. Optometry & Vision Science, 87, 21-27.
11. Guide, M. (1998). MathWorks. Natick, MA: Author.
12. Inman, V. (1966). Human locomotion. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 94, 1047-1054.
13. Jansen, S., Toet, A., & Delleman, N. (2010). Restricting the vertical and horizontal extent of the field-of-view: Effects on manoeuvring performance. The Ergonomics Open Journal, 3, 19-24.
14. Kasper, E., Haworth, L., Szoboszlay, Z., King, R., & Halmos, Z. (1997). Effects of in-flight field-of-view restriction on rotorcraft pilot head movement. Proceedings of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 3058, 34-45.
15. Marigold, D. (2008). Role of peripheral visual cues in online visual guidance of locomotion. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 36, 145-151.
16. Marigold, D.,&Patla, A. (2008). Visual information from the lower visual field is important for walking across multi-surface terrain. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 23-31.
17. Marigold, D., Weerdesteyn, V., Patla, A., & Duysens, J. (2007). Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 32-42.
18. McFadyen, B.,&Winter, D. (1991). Anticipatory locomotor adjustments during obstructed human walking. Neuroscience Research Communities, 9, 37-44.
19. Mochon, S., & McMahon, T. (1980). Ballistic walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 13, 49-57.
20. Mohagheghi, A., Moraes, R., & Patla, A. (2004). The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 459-468.
21. Patla, A. (1997). Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait & Posture, 5, 54-69.
22. Patla,A. (1998).Howis human gait controlled by vision. Ecological Psychology, 10, 287-302.
23. Patla, A., Davies, T., & Niechwiej, E. (2004). Obstacle avoidance during locomotion using haptic information in normally sighted humans. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 173-185.
24. Patla, A., Prentice, S., Robinson, C., & Neufeld, J. (1991). Visual control of locomotion: Strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 603-634.
25. Patla, A., & Rietdyk, S. (1993). Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: Effect of obstacle height and width. Gait & Posture, 1, 45-60.
26. Patla, A., Rietdyk, S., Martin, C., & Prentice, S. (1996). Locomotor patterns of the leading and the trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: Some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 35-47.
27. Patla, A., & Vickers, J. (1997). Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? Neuroreport, 8, 3661-3665.
28. Patla, A., & Vickers, J. (2003). How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? Experimental Brain Research, 148, 133-138.
29. Patterson, R.,Winterbottom, M., & Pierce, B. (2006). Perceptual issues in the use of head-mounted visual displays. Human Factors, 48, 555-573.
30. Paulus, W., Straube, A., & Brandt, T. (1984). Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 107, 1143-1163.
31. Pierrynowski, M., Winter, D., & Norman, R. (1980). Transfers of mechanical energy within the total body and mechanical efficiency during treadmill walking. Ergonomics, 23, 147-156.
32. Rhea, C., & Rietdyk, S. (2007). Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neuroscience Letters, 418, 60-65.
33. Rieser, J., Hill, E., Talor, C., Bradfield, A., & Rosen, S. (1992). Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 210-221.
34. Rietdyk, S.,&Drifmeyer, J. (2009). The rough-terrain problem:Accurate foot targeting as a function of visual information regarding target location. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42, 37-48.
35. Rietdyk, S., & Rhea, C. (2006). Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 272-278.
36. Roetenberg, D., Luinge, H., & Slycke, P. (2009). Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF human motion tracking using miniature inertial sensors. Enschede, the Netherlands: Xsens.
37. Rushton, S., Harris, J., Lloyd, M., & Wann, J. (1998). Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Current Biology, 8, 1191-1194.
38. Rushton, S.,Wen, J.,&Allison, R. (2002). Egocentric direction and the visual guidance of robot locomotion background, theory and implementation. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision, 2525, 27-36.
39. Saunders, J., Inman, V. T., & Eberhart, H. D. (1953). The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 35, 543-558.
40. StatSoft. (2007). STATISTICA for Windows (Version 8). Tulsa, OK: Author.
41. Toet, A., Jansen, S.,&Delleman, N. (2007). Effects of field-of-view restrictions on speed and accuracy of manoeuvring. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 1245-1256.
42. Toet, A., Jansen, S.,&Delleman, N. (2008). Effects of field-of-view restriction on manoeuvring in a 3-D environment. Ergonomics, 51, 385-394.
43. Toet, A., Van Der Hoeven, M., Kahrimanović, M., & Delleman, N. (2008). Effects of field of view on human locomotion. Proceedings of SPIE, 6955, 69550H.1-69550H-11.
44. Turano, K., Herdman, S.,&Dagnelie,G. (1993).Visual stabilization of posture in retinitis pigmentosa and in artificially restricted visual fields. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 3004-3010.
45. Wagenaar,W. (1969). Note on the construction of digram-balanced Latin squares. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 384-386.
46. Warren,W.,Kay, B., Zosh,W., Duchon, A.,&Sahuc, S. (2001).Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213-216. (Pubitemid 32125268)
47. Waters, R., &Mulroy, S. (1999). The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait & Posture, 9, 207-231.
48. Watt, S., Bradshaw, M., & Rushton, S. (2000). Field of view affects reaching, not grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 411-416.
49. Wells, M., & Venturino, M. (1990). Performance and head movements using a helmet-mounted display with different sized fieldsof-view. Optical Engineering, 29, 870-877.
50. Werner, E., & Rossi, C. (1991). Manual of visual fields. London: Churchill Livingstone.
51. Willemsen, P., Colton, M., Creem-Regehr, S., & Thompson, W. (2009). The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6, 8:1-8:14.
52. Wu, B., Ooi, T., & He, Z. (2004). Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature, 428, 73-77.