Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow

Current Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 21, 1998, Pages 1191-1194

  Rushton, Simon K ^a   Harris, Julie M ^b   Lloyd, Maugan R ^a   Wann, John P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032558690     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00492-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gibson JJ: The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1950.
2. Mollon J: "....on the basis of velocity cues alone": some perceptual themes. Q J Exp Psychol, 1997, 50A:859-878.
3. Calvert ES: Visual aids for landing in bad visibility, with particular reference to the transition from instrument to visual flight. Trans Ilium Eng Soc, Lond 1950, 15:183-219.
4. Regan D, Beverley KI: How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving. Science 1982, 215:194-196.
5. Warren WH, Hannon DJ: Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical-flow. Nature 1988, 336:162-163.
6. Longuet-Higgins HC, Prazdny K: The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 1980, 208:385-397.
7. Rieger JH, Lawton DT: Processing differential image motion. J Opt Soc Am 1985, A2:354-360.
8. Cutting JE, Springer K, Baren PA, Johnson SH: Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1992, 121:41-72.
9. Hildreth EC: Recovering heading for visually-guided navigation. Vision Res 1992, 32:1177-1192.
10. Perrone JA, Stone LS: A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex. Vision Res 1994, 34:2917-2938.
11. Royden CS: Mathematical analysis of motion-opponent mechanisms used in the determination of heading and depth. J Opt Soc Am [A] 1997, 14:2128-2143.
12. van den Berg AV: Perception of heading. Nature 1993, 365:497-498.
13. Royden CS, Banks MS, Crowell JA: The perception of heading during eye-movement. Nature 1992, 360:583-585.
14. Saito H, Yukie M, Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Fukada Y, Iwai E: Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 1986, 6:145-157.
15. Duffy CJ, Wurtz RH: Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity of large-field stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1991, 65:1329-1345.
16. Britten KH, van Wezel RJA: Electrical microstimulation of cortical area MST biases heading perception in monkeys. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:59-63.
17. Shillcock R, Kelly ML Monaghan P: Processing of palindromes in neglect dyslexia. Neuroreport 1998, 9: in press.
18. Rock I: The Nature of Perceptual Adaptation. London: Basic Books; 1996.
19. US National Institutes of Health, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/
20. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Kirchner W, Zhang SW: Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees. Vis Neurosci 1991, 6:519-535.
21. Duchon AP, Warren WH: Interaction of two strategies for controlling locomotion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998, 39:S892.
22. Llewellyn KR: Visual guidance of locomotion. J Exp Psychol 1971, 91:245-261.
23. Karnath H: Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle and proprioception and vestibular stimulation. Brain 1994, 117:100-1012.
24. Gibson JJ: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1979.