When repetition isn't the best practice strategy: Effects of blocked and random practice schedules

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 368-383

  Stambaugh, Laura A ^a  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

beginning band; blocked and random; clarinet; contextual interference; practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651246881     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022429410385945     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Austin, J. R., & Berg, M. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34, 535-558.
2. Baker, B. (2002). An investigation of the relative effects of blocked and random practice on the learning of ballistic motor skills in typically developing children and children with Down syndrome. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington. (AAT 3072055)
3. Barry, N. H. (1990). The effects of different practice techniques upon technical accuracy and musicality in student instrumental music performance. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 44, 4-8.
4. Barry, N. H. (1992). The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance. Psychology of Music, 20, 112-123.
5. Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 215-244). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Brady, F. (2004). Contextual interference: A meta-analytic study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 116-126.
7. da Costa, D. (1999). An investigation into instrumental pupils' attitudes to varied, structured practice: Two methods of approach. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 65-77.
8. Davis, C. C. (2009). Effects of early and late rest intervals on performance and overnight consolidation of a keyboard sequence. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 252-266.
9. Drake, C., & Palmer, C. (2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: Relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74, 1-32.
10. Duerksen, G. L. (1972). From research to the music classroom no. 3: Teaching instrumental music. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
11. Duke, R. A. & Davis, C. M. (2006). Procedural memory consolidation in the performance of brief keyboard sequences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 111-124.
12. Duke, R. A., Davis, C. M., Allen, S. E., & Goins, K. R. (2006). Focus of attention affects performance of motor skills in music. Paper presented at the 60th MENC National Biennial In-Service Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
13. Edwards, J. M., Elliott, D., & Lee, T. D. (1986). Contextual interference effects during skill acquisition and transfer in Down's syndrome adolescents. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 3, 250-258.
14. Goode, S., & Magill, R. A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 308-314.
15. Green, E. A. H. (2006). Practicing successfully: A masterclass in the musical art. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
16. Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 835-841.
17. Hallam, S. (2001). The development of expertise in young musicians: Strategy use, knowledge acquisition and individual diversity. Music Education Research, 3, 7-23.
18. Hewitt, M. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists' music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307-322.
19. Landin, D., & Hebert, E. P. (1997). A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 357-361.
20. Langolf, G. D., Chaffin, D. B., & Foulke, J. A. (1976). An investigation of Fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 113-128.
21. Lee, T. D., Chamberlin, C. J., & Hodges, N. J. (2001). Practice. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 115-143). New York, NY: John Wiley.
22. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
23. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives on motor memory, learning and control (pp. 3-22). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
24. Lin, C.-H. (2007). Contextual interference in motor skill learning: An investigation of the practice schedule effect using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California. (AAT 3283542)
25. Maynard, L. M. (2006). The role of repetition in the practice sessions of artist teachers and their students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 167, 61-72.
26. McPherson, G. E., & Renwick, J. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children's musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169-186.
27. Moreno, F. J., Avila, F., Damas, J., Garcia, J. A., Luis, V., Reina, R., & Ruiz, A. (2003). Contextual interference in learning precision skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 121-128.
28. Palmer, C., & Meyer, R. K. (2000). Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychological Science, 11, 63-68.
29. Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1993). Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 457-470.
30. Pigott, R. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Motor schema: The structure of the variability session. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 41-45.
31. Pitts, S., Davidson, J. W., & McPherson, G. E. (2000). Developing effective practise strategies: Case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2, 45-56.
32. Pollock, B. J., & Lee, T. D. (1997). Dissociated contextual interference effects in children and adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 851-858.
33. Rey, P. D., Whitehurst, M., & Wood, J. M. (1983). Effects of experience and contextual interference on learning and transfer by boys and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 581-582.
34. Rodet, X., Roebel, A., Peeters, G., Bogaards, N., & Corfu, F. (2008). SmartMusic© (Version 11.0.0.2343). Eden Prairie, MN: MakeMusic.
35. Rohwer, D., & Polk, J. (2006). Practice behaviors of eighth-grade instrumental musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 350-362.
36. Rose, L. P. (2006). The effects of contextual interference on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a music motor skill among university musicians (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. (AAT 3229248)
37. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
38. Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145-157.
39. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
40. Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345-366). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
41. Simmons, A. L., & Duke, R. A. (2006). Effects of sleep on performance of a keyboard melody. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 257-269.
42. Singer, S. (1956). Metodo teorico-pratico per oboe [Theoretical and practical method for oboe]. Milan, Italy: G. Ricordi & Comp.
43. Stambaugh, L. A., & Demorest, S. M. (2010). Effects of practice schedule on wind instrument performance: A preliminary application of a motor learning principle. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 20-28.
44. Ste-Marie, D. M., Clark, S. E., Findlay, L. C., & Latimer, A. E. (2004). High levels of contextual interference enhance handwriting skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 115-126.