-
1
-
-
29144532484
-
-
J. Huang, E.D. Walker, P.Y. Giroux, J. Vulule, and J.R. Miller Med. Vet. Entomol. 19 2005 442
-
(2005)
Med. Vet. Entomol.
, vol.19
, pp. 442
-
-
Huang, J.1
Walker, E.D.2
Giroux, P.Y.3
Vulule, J.4
Miller, J.R.5
-
6
-
-
28444493241
-
-
B.G.J. Knols, L.A. Sumba, T.O. Guda, A.I. Deng, A. Hassanali, and J.C. Beier Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 24 2004 260
-
(2004)
Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci.
, vol.24
, pp. 260
-
-
Knols, B.G.J.1
Sumba, L.A.2
Guda, T.O.3
Deng, A.I.4
Hassanali, A.5
Beier, J.C.6
-
10
-
-
33746899741
-
-
K. Ganesan, M.J. Mendki, M.V.S. Suryanarayana, S. Prakash, and R.C. Malhotra Aust. J. Entomol. 45 2006 75
-
(2006)
Aust. J. Entomol.
, vol.45
, pp. 75
-
-
Ganesan, K.1
Mendki, M.J.2
Suryanarayana, M.V.S.3
Prakash, S.4
Malhotra, R.C.5
-
11
-
-
51449093311
-
-
K.R. Sharma, T. Seenivasagan, A.N. Rao, K. Ganesan, O.P. Agarwal, R.C. Malhotra, and S. Prakash Parasitol. Res. 103 2008 1065
-
(2008)
Parasitol. Res.
, vol.103
, pp. 1065
-
-
Sharma, K.R.1
Seenivasagan, T.2
Rao, A.N.3
Ganesan, K.4
Agarwal, O.P.5
Malhotra, R.C.6
Prakash, S.7
-
12
-
-
0141904639
-
-
J.D. Trexler, C.S. Apperson, L. Zurek, C. Gemeno, M.J. Perich, D. Carlson, and C. Schal J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 19 2003 228
-
(2003)
J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.
, vol.19
, pp. 228
-
-
Trexler, J.D.1
Apperson, C.S.2
Zurek, L.3
Gemeno, C.4
Perich, M.J.5
Carlson, D.6
Schal, C.7
-
13
-
-
1642488974
-
-
J.D. Trexler, C.S. Apperson, L. Zurek, C. Gemeno, C. Schal, M. Kaufman, E. Walker, D.W. Watson, and L. Wallace J. Med. Entomol. 40 2003 841
-
(2003)
J. Med. Entomol.
, vol.40
, pp. 841
-
-
Trexler, J.D.1
Apperson, C.S.2
Zurek, L.3
Gemeno, C.4
Schal, C.5
Kaufman, M.6
Walker, E.7
Watson, D.W.8
Wallace, L.9
-
19
-
-
44749094974
-
-
S. Li, J.F. Picimbon, S. Ji, Y. Kan, Q. Chuanling, J.J. Zhou, and P. Pelosi Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 372 2008 464
-
(2008)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
, vol.372
, pp. 464
-
-
Li, S.1
Picimbon, J.F.2
Ji, S.3
Kan, Y.4
Chuanling, Q.5
Zhou, J.J.6
Pelosi, P.7
-
22
-
-
73549104790
-
-
B.N. Acharya, D. Saraswat, M. Tiwari, A.K. Shrivastava, R. Ghorpade, S. Bapna, and M.P. Kaushik Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 2010 430
-
(2010)
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
, vol.45
, pp. 430
-
-
Acharya, B.N.1
Saraswat, D.2
Tiwari, M.3
Shrivastava, A.K.4
Ghorpade, R.5
Bapna, S.6
Kaushik, M.P.7
-
26
-
-
84888443822
-
-
note
-
3COONa) in a solution of 1.53 mL (0.012 mol) ethyl acetoacetate in 25.0 mL of ethyl alcohol was taken and cooled in an ice-bath. Now the diazotized solution was added to this solution dropwise with thorough stirring. The reaction mixture was kept overnight, filtered under suction, washed thoroughly with cold water, dried and recrystallised from a mixture of dimethylformamide (DMF) and ethyl alcohol (EtOH) (3:7, v/v) to give the corresponding butanoate.
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
84888457179
-
-
note
-
Ae. albopictus used for the oviposition experiments were utilized from the laboratory colony maintained since 1973 in our insectaria. The experiments were performed at 27 ± 2 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, L10:D14 regime. The illumination inside the oviposition cages was 80-100 lx. Four to seven-days old adults of Ae. albopictus (25 pairs) were kept in separate standard-sized wooden cages (750 × 600 × 600 mm) with a sleeve opening on one side. Sucrose (10%) was provided to adults, and female mosquitoes were fed on rabbit blood for two days initially and then every alternative day until the experiment was completed. Laboratory bioassays were performed (duplicates) in two separate cages, enamel bowls with 10 cm diameter filled with 500 mL of de-chlorinated water was used as the oviposition substrate. One milliliter of the stock solution in methanol containing the desired compound (to make 10 ppm concentration) was added to the enamel bowls. All stock solution of the test chemicals were dissolved in HPLC-grade methanol (Merck) and stored in deep freeze after every experiment. The bowls were rinsed with tap water and washed with methanol before commencing the experiment. The experiment was completely randomized and in each bioassay females were allowed to choose between the treated and untreated (control) substrates. The position of substrate in dual choice experiment was changed in a clockwise rotation every day. Each compound was evaluated separately in duplicates, and the experiment was repeated for seven days with different batch of mosquitoes. The number of eggs laid in control and treatment were counted manually to assess the oviposition preference of the mosquito species.
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
67649798318
-
-
T. Seenivasagan, K.R. Sharma, A. Srivastava, B.D. Parashar, S.C. Pant, and S. Prakash J. Vector Borne Dis. 46 2009 125
-
(2009)
J. Vector Borne Dis.
, vol.46
, pp. 125
-
-
Seenivasagan, T.1
Sharma, K.R.2
Srivastava, A.3
Parashar, B.D.4
Pant, S.C.5
Prakash, S.6
|