Temporal and Taxonomic Variability in Response of Fauna to Riparian Restoration

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 126-135

  Golet, Gregory H ^a   Gardali, Thomas ^b   Hunt, John W ^c   Koenig, David A ^c   Williams, Neal M ^d  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^b PRBO CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BRYN MAWR COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

diversity; Indicators; Monitoring; Restoration; Richness; Riparian

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FAUNA; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN ZONE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO RIVER; UNITED STATES;

APOIDEA; AVES; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; INVERTEBRATA; RODENTIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 78651230545     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00525.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alpert, P., F. T. Griggs, and D. R. Peterson 1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: initial results from the Sacramento River Project. Restoration Ecology 7:360-368.
2. Balmford, A., and A. Long 1995. Across-country analyses of biodiversity congruence and current conservation effort in the tropics. Conservation Biology 9:1539-1547.
3. Beattie, A. J., and I. Oliver 1994. Taxonomic minimalism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:488-490.
4. Belbin, L. 1992. Comparing two sets of community data: a method for testing reserve adequacy. Australian Journal of Ecology 17:255-262.
5. Bisby, F. A. 1995. Characterization of biodiversity. Pages 21-106 in V. H. Heywood and R. T. Watson, editors. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
6. Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity. Ecological Applications 9:164-170.
7. Block, W. M., A. B. Franklin, J. P. Ward Jr., J. L. Ganey, and G. C. White 2001. Design and implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9:293-303.
8. Buer, K., D. Forwalter, M. Kissel, and B. Stohler 1989. The middle Sacramento River: Human impacts on physical and ecological processes along a meandering river. Pages 22-32 in D. L. Abell, editor. Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference: protection management and restoration for the 1990s. General Technical Report PSW-110. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, California.
9. Dunn, E. H., and C. J. Ralph 2004. Use of mist nets as a tool for bird population monitoring. Studies in Avian Biology 29:1-6.
10. Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000. Defining the goals of restoration: honesty is the best policy. Restoration Ecology 8:2-9.
11. Gardali, T., A. L. Holmes, S. S. Small, N. Nur, G. R. Geupel, and G. H. Golet 2006. Abundance patterns of landbirds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 14:391-403.
12. Gaston, K. J. 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220-227.
13. Gaston, K. J., and J. I. Spicer 2004. Biodiversity: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom.
14. Golet, G. H., R. J. Bogiatto, J. W. Hunt, D. Koenig, and G. Werner 2007. Effects of riparian restoration on abundances of small mammal agricultural pest species (California). Ecological Restoration 25:136-137.
15. Golet, G. H., T. Gardali, C. Howell, J. Hunt, R. Luster, B. Rainey, M. Roberts, H. Swagerty, and N. Williams 2008. Wildlife Response to Restoration on the Sacramento River. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, Vol. 6, Issue 2 (June), Article 1. .
16. Griggs, F. T., and G. H. Golet 2002. Riparian valley oak (Quercus lobata) forest restoration on the middle Sacramento River. Pages 543-550 in R. B. Standiford, D. McCreary, and K. L. Purcell (technical coordinators). Proceedings of the fifth symposium on oak woodlands: oaks in California's changing landscape October 22-25, 2001, San Diego, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California.
17. Griggs, F. T., and D. R. Peterson 1997. Evaluation of techniques and costs for valley oak riparian forest restoration on the Sacramento River. Proceedings of a symposium on oak woodlands: Ecology, management, and urban interface issues Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-160. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California.
18. Harrison, S., S. J. Ross, and J. H. Lawton 1992. Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:151-158.
19. Holl, K. D., and J. Cairns Jr. 2002. Monitoring and appraisal. Pages 411-432 in M. R. Perrow, and A. J. Davy, editors. Handbook of ecological restoration, Vol. 1, Principles of restoration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
20. Holl, K. D., and E. E. Crone 2004. Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:922-933.
21. Hujik, P., and F. T. Griggs 1995a. Cutting size, horticultural treatments affects survival and growth of riparian species (California). Restoration and Management Notes 13:219-220.
22. Hujik, P., and F. T. Griggs 1995b. Field-seeded riparian trees and shrubs thrive in non-irrigated plots (California). Restoration and Management Notes 13:220-221.
23. Humple, D. L., and G. R. Geupel 2002. Autumn populations of birds in riparian habitat of California's central valley. Western Birds 33:34-50.
24. Jeppesen E., J. P. Jensen, and M. Søndergaard 2002. Response of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fish to re-oligotrophication: a 11 year study of 23 Danish lakes. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 5:31-43.
25. Kremen, C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2:203-217.
26. Lambeck, R. J. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11:849-856.
27. McCoy, E. D., and H. R. Mushinsky 2002. Measuring the success of wildlife community restoration. Ecological Applications 12:1861-1871.
28. MELP (Ministry of Environment, Land and Parks). 2001. Inventory methods for moles and pocket gopher, Version 2.0, No. 26. Retrieved from: Last accessed February 8th, 2007.
29. Morrison, M. L. 2002. Page. 215 Wildlife restoration: techniques for habitat analysis and animal monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC.
30. Oliver, I., and A. H. Beattie 1993. A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7:562-568.
31. Oliver, I., A. J. Beattie, and A. York 1998. Spatial fidelity of plant, vertebrate, and invertebrate assemblages in multiple-use forest in Eastern Australia. Conservation Biology 12:822-835.
32. Paller, M. H., M. J. M. Reichart, and J. M. Dean 2000. Use of fish community data to evaluate restoration success of a riparian stream. Ecological Engineering 15(1):S112-118.
33. Paszkowski, C. A., and W. M. Tonn 2000. Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshwater Biology 43:421-437.
34. Pélissier, R., P. Couteron, S. Dray, and D. Sabatier 2003. Consistency between ordination techniques and diversity measurements: two strategies for species occurrence data. Ecology 84:242-251.
35. Prendergast, J. R., and B. C. Eversham 1997. Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20:210-216.
36. Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, J. H. Lawton, B. C. Eversham, and D. W. Gibbons 1993. Rare species, the fidelity of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335-337.
37. Purvis, A., and A. Hector 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405:212-219.
38. Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, and D. F. DeSante 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California.
39. Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. O. Olson, and C. Loucks 1999. Who's where in North America? Patterns of species richness and the utility of indicator taxa for conservation. Bioscience 49:369-381.
40. Roberge, J.-M., and P. Angelstam 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18:76-85.
41. Ruiz-Jaen, M. C., and T. M. Aide 2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured?. Restoration Ecology 13:569-577.
42. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER International Primer on ecological restoration (available from ) accessed May 2007. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tuscon, Arizona.
43. Shmida, A., and Wilson, M. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 12:1-20.
44. Singer, M. B., and T. Dunne 2001. Identifying eroding and depositional reaches of valley by analysis of suspended-sediment transport in the Sacramento River, California. Water Resources Research 37:3371-3381.
45. Su, J. C., D. M. Debinski, M. E. Jakubaushas, and K Kindscher 2004. Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conservation Biology 18:167-173.
46. SYSTAT. 1996. Statistics, SYSTAT 6.0 for Windows. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois.
47. Weaver, J. C. 1994. Indicator species and scale of observation. Conservation Biology 9:939-942.
48. Webb, N. R., and P. J. Hopkins 1984. Invertebrate diversity on fragmented Calluna heathland. Journal of Applied Ecology 21:921-933.
49. Westoby, M. 1985. Two main relationships among the components of species richness. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 14:103-107.
50. Whittaker, R. M. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30:279-338.
51. Wiener, J. G., and M. H. Smith 1972. Relative efficiencies of four small mammal traps. Journal of Mammalogy 53:868-873.
52. Wilcox, B. A., D. D. Murphy, P. R. Ehrlich, and G. T. Austin 1986. Insular biogeography of the montane butterfly faunas in the Great Basin: comparison with birds and mammals. Oecologia 69:188-194.
53. Williams, N. M. 2007. Restoration of native bee pollinators within the Sacramento River system (California). Ecological Restoration 25:67-68.
54. Young, T. P. 2000. Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biological Conservation 92:73-83.