Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: Initial results from the Sacramento River Project

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 360-368

  Alpert, Peter ^a   Griggs, F Thomas ^b   Peterson, Daryl R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLOOD CONTROL; PATCHINESS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN FOREST;

EID: 0033493305     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72030.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alpert, P., and J. Kagan. 1998. The utility of plant community types: a practical review of riparian classifications in the intermountain U.S. Natural Areas Journal 18:124-137.
2. Baker, W. L., and G. M. Walford. 1995. Multiple stable states and models of riparian vegetation succession on the Animas River, Colorado. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85:320-338.
3. Berg, D. R. 1995. Riparian silvicultural system design and assessment in the Pacific Northwest Cascade Mountains, U.S.A. Ecological Applications 5:87-96.
4. Carbiener, R., and A. Schnitzer. 1990. Evolution of major pattern models and processes of alluvial forest of the Rhine in the rift valley (France/Germany). Vegetatio 88:115-129.
5. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
6. Conard, S. G., R. L. MacDonald, and R. F. Holland. 1980. Riparian vegetation and flora of the Sacramento Valley. Pages 47-55 in A. Sands, editor. Riparian forests in California: their ecology and conservation. Institute of Ecology, University of California, Davis.
7. Fleischner, T. L. 1994. Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology 8:629-644.
8. Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, and W. M. Lewis, Jr. 1995. Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbances, and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19:547-557.
9. Goodwin, C. N., C. P. Hawkins, and J. L. Kershner. 1997. Riparian restoration in the western United States: overview and perspective. Restoration Ecology 5(Suppl):4-14.
10. Gore, J. A., and F. D. Shields, Jr. 1995. Can large rivers be restored? BioScience 45:142-152.
11. Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41:540-551.
12. Griggs, F. T. 1993. Protecting biological diversity through partnerships: the Sacramento River Project. Pages 235-237 in J. E. Keeley, editor. Interface between ecology and land development in California. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Los Angeles.
13. Griggs, F. T. 1994. Adaptive management strategy helps assure cost-effective, large-scale riparian forest restoration (California). Restoration & Management Notes 12:80-81.
14. Harris, R., and C. Olson. 1997. Two-stage system for prioritizing riparian restoration at the stream reach and community scales. Restoration Ecology 5(Suppl):34-42.
15. Hickman, J. C., editor. 1993. The Jepson manual. Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
16. Hujik, P., and F. T. Griggs. 1995a. Cutting size and horticultural treatments affect survival and growth of riparian species (California). Restoration & Management Notes 13: 219-220.
17. Hujik, P., and F. T. Griggs. 1995b. Field-seeded riparian trees and shrubs thrive in non-irrigated plots (California). Restoration & Management Notes 13:220-221.
18. Kauffman, J. B. 1988. The status of riparian habitats in the Pacific Northwest forests. Pages 45-55 in K. J. Raedeke, editor. Streamside management: riparian wildlife and forestry interactions. Contribution 59. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.
19. Kiener, A., and G. R. Geupel. 1997. Songbird response to revegetation efforts at Stony Creek and other Nature Conservancy sites along the Sacramento Region. Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and The Nature Conservancy by the Point Reyes Bird Observatory, Stinson Beach, California.
20. Knopf, F. L., R. R. Johnson, T. Rich, F. B. Samson, and R. C. Szaro. 1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272-284.
21. Landers, D. H. 1997. Riparian restoration: current status and the reach to the future. Restoration Ecology 5(Suppl):113- 121.
22. Naiman, R. J., H. Décamps, and M. Pollack. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications 3:209-212.
23. National Research Council 1995. Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries. National Research Council, Washington, D. C.
24. Nilsson, C. 1992. Conservation management of riparian communities. Pages 352-372 in L. Hansson, editor. Ecological principles of nature conservation. Elsevier, London.
25. Reiner, R., and F. T. Griggs. 1989. TNC undertakes riparian forest restoration projects in California. Restoration & Management Notes 7:3-8.
26. Rood, S. B., and J. M. Mahoney. 1990. Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: probable causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14:451-464.
27. Sawyer, J. O., Jr., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society Press, Sacramento.
28. Scott, M. J., G. T. Auble, and J. M. Friedman. 1997. Flood dependency of cottonwood establishment along the Missouri River, Montana, U.S.A. Ecological Applications 7:677-690.
29. Smith, F. E. 1980. A short review of the status of riparian forests in California. Pages 1-2, in A. Sands, editor. Riparian forests in California: their ecology and conservation. Institute of Ecology, University of California, Davis.
30. Soil Conservation Service. 1993. National soil survey handbook. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
31. SPSS. 1997. Systat 7.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois.
32. Thomas, L., and C. J. Krebs. 1997. A review of statistical power analysis software. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 78:126-138.
33. Toner, M., and P. Keddy. 1997. River hydrology and riparian wetlands: a predictive model for ecological assembly. Ecological Applications 7:236-346.
34. Wallace, J. B., S. L. Eggert, J. L. Meyer, and J. R. Webster. 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102-104.
35. Warner, R. E., and K. M. Hendrix, editors. 1984. California riparian systems: ecology, conservation, and productive management. University of California Press, Berkeley.