Using SCOR model with fuzzy MCDM approach to assess competitiveness positioning of supply chains: Focus on shipbuilding supply chains

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 93-109

  Zangoueinezhad, Abouzar ^a   Azar, Adel ^a   Kazazi, Aboulfazl ^b  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ALLAMEH TABATABA'I UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COMPETITIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MODELING; SHIPBUILDING;

IRAN;

EID: 78651227113     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2010.533715     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. NAESENS, K., GELDERS, L. and PINTELON, L., 2007, A swift response tool for measuring the strategic fit for resource pooling: A case study. Management Decision, 45(3), 434-449.
2. MELLAT-PARAST, M. and DIGMAN, L. A., 2007, A framework for quality management practices in strategic alliances. Management Decision, 45(4), 802-818.
3. MARTINEZ-OLVERA, C., 2008, Methodology for realignment of supply chain structural elements. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 714-722.
4. GUNASEKARAN, A., PATEL, C. and MCGAUGHEY, R. E., 2004, A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347.
5. BHATNAGAR, R. and TEO, C. C., 2009, Role of logistics in enhancing competitive advantage: A value chain framework for global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(3), 202-226.
6. HILLETOFTH, P., 2009, How to develop a differentiated supply chain strategy. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109(1), 16-33.
7. HUAN, S. H., SHEORAN, S. K. and WANG, G., 2004, A review and analysis of SCOR model. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 23-29.
8. SHEU, J. B., 2004, A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research Part E, 40(1), 39-61.
9. HO, G., LAU, H., CHUNG, S., FUNG, R., CHAN, T. and LEE, C., 2008, Fuzzy rule sets for enhancing performance in a supply chain network. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108(7), 974-972.
10. MICHELI, G. J. L., 2008, A decision-maker-centred supplier selection approach for critical supplies. Management Decision, 46(6), 918-932.
11. DELGADO, M., VERDEGAY, L. and VILA, M. A., 1992, Linguistic decision-making models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7, 479-492.
12. HWANG, C. L. and YOON, K., 1981, Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications (New York: Springer).
13. KAUFMANN, A. and GUPTA, M. M., 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold).
14. BELLMAN, R. E. and ZADEH, L. A., 1970, Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Sciences, 17(4), 141-164.
15. HERRERA, F. and HERRERA-VIEDMA, E., 2000, Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 67-82.
16. GUNASEKARAN, A., PATEL, C. and TIRTIROGLU, E., 2001, Performance measurement and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(1-2), 71-87.
17. BHAGWAT, R. and SHARMA, M. K., 2007, Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43-62.
18. FARRIS, M. T., 2010, Solutions to strategic supply chain mapping issues. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40(3), 164-180.
19. CHAN, F. T. S., QI, H. J., CHAN, H. K., LAU, H. C. W. and IP, R. W. L., 2003, A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Management Decision, 41(7), 635-642.
20. CHAN, F. T. S. and QI, H. F., 2003, An innovative performance measurement methods for supply chain management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 209-223.
21. THEERANUPHATTANA, A. and TANG, J. C. S., 2008, A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains: Alternative considerations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(1), 125-148.
22. BICHESCU, B. C. and FRY, M. J., 2009, A numerical analysis of supply chain performance under split decision rights. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science, 37(2), 358-379.
23. ARAMYAN, L. H., LANSINK, A. O., VORST, F. V. D. and KOOTEN, O. V., 2007, Performance measurement in agri-food supply chains: A case study. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 304-315.
24. BERRAH, L. and CLIVILLE, V., 2007, Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 709-719.
25. LAI, K., NGAI, E. W. T. and CHENG, T. C. E., 2002, Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics. Transportation Research Part E, 38(6), 439-456.
26. GAVIRNENI, S., 2006, Price fluctuations, information sharing, and supply chain performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(3), 1651-1663.
27. SAIZ, J. J. A., BAS, A. O. and RODRIGUEZ, R. R., 2007, Performance measurement system for enterprise networks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(4), 305-334.
28. SHEPHERD, C. and GUNTER, H., 2006, Measuring supply chain performance: Current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3-4), 242-258.
29. RICHEY, R. G., CHEN, H., UPRETI, R., FAWCETT, S. E. and ADAMS, F. G., 2009, The moderating role of barriers on the relationship between drivers to supply chain integration and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(10), 826-840.
30. HUANG, S. H., SHEORAN, S. K. and KESKAR, H., 2005, Computer-assisted supply chain configuration based on supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 48(2), 377-394.
31. ZADEH, L. A., 1965, Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
32. WU, H. Y., TZENG, G. H. and CHEN, Y. H., 2009, A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10135-10147.
33. LEE, A. H. I., CHEN, W. C. and CHANG, C. J., 2008, A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96-107.
34. DUBOIS, D. and PRADE, H., 1978, Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of System Sciences, 9(6), 615-626.
35. ZADEH, L. A., 1975, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Science, 8(3), 199-249.
36. YAGER, R. R., 1993, Fuzzy screening systems. In: Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art, edited by R. Lowen and M. Roubens (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 251-61.
37. YAGER, R. R., 1988, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems: Man and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183-196.
38. YAGER, R. R., 1994, Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67(2), 129-145.
39. SAATY, T. L., 1994, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications).
40. BUCKLEY, J. J., 1985, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Theory, 17(3), 233-247.
41. VARMA, S., WADHWA, S. and DESHMUKH, S. G., 2008, Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance: Application of analytical hierarchy process to balanced scorecard. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(3), 343-356.
42. SHARMA, M. K. and BHAGWAT, R., 2007, An integrated BSC-AHP approach for supply chain management evaluation. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(3), 57-68.