Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 280-282

  Yong, Daniel Z ^a   Tsivian, Matvey ^a   Zilberman, Dorit E ^a   Ferrandino, Michael N ^a   Mouraviev, Vladimir ^a   Albala, David M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

operative time; prostate cancer; prostate size; Radical prostatectomy; robotics; surgical experience

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN WEIGHT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE WEIGHT; PROSTATECTOMY; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; WORK EXPERIENCE;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78651105837     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09511.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ploussard G, Xylinas E, Paul A, et al. Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 2009; 23: 939-43
2. Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM,. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 174: 2323-9
3. Secin FP, Jiborn T, Bjartell AS, et al. Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 134-45
4. D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, et al. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 322-8
5. Eijkemans MJ, van Houdenhoven M, Nguyen T, Boersma E, Steyerberg EW, Kazemier G,. Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon's estimate. Anesthesiology 2009; 112: 41-9
6. Schroeck FR, de Sousa CA, Kalman RA, et al. Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology 2008; 71: 597-601
7. Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102: 28-32
8. Chan RC, Barocas DA, Chang SS, et al. Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1140-4
9. Chang CM, Moon D, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG,. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 285-90
10. Levinson AW, Ward NT, Sulman A, et al. The impact of prostate size on perioperative outcomes in a large laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series. J Endourol 2009; 23: 147-52
11. Pettus JA, Masterson T, Sokol A, et al. Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009; 182: 949-55
12. Thiel DD, Francis P, Heckman MG, Winfield HN,. Prospective evaluation of factors affecting operating time in a residency/fellowship training program incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2008; 22: 1331-8
13. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol 2009; 182: 1126-32