The contribution of language-specific knowledge in the selection of statistically-coherent word candidates

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 171-180

  Toro, Juan M ^a   Pons, Ferran ^b   Bion, Ricardo A H ^c   Sebastián Gallés, Núria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Language; Linguistic constraints; Speech perception; Statistical learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651084476     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aslin R., Newport E. What statistical learning can and can't tell us about language acquisition. Infant pathways to language: Methods, models, and research directions 2008, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Colombo, P. McCardle, L. Freund (Eds.).
2. Aslin R., Saffran J., Newport E. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 1998, 9:321-324.
3. Bates E., Elman J. Learning rediscovered. Science 1996, 274:1849-1850.
4. Berent I., Lennertz T., Jun J., Moreno M.A., Smolensky P. Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105:5321-5325.
5. Berent I., Lennertz T., Smolensky P., Vaknin-Nusbaum V. Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: Evidence from nasal clusters. Phonology 2009, 26:75-108.
6. Berent I., Steriade D., Lennertz T., Vaknin V. What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 2007, 104:591-630.
7. Bion R.A.H., Varela S., Nespor M. Acoustic markers of prominence influence adults' and infants' memory of speech sequences. Language & Speech 2011, 54:1-18.
8. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1) [Computer program] (retrieved 11.05.09). http://www.praat.org/.
9. Bonatti L., Peña M., Nespor M., Mehler J. Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science 2005, 16:451-459.
10. Casillas G. The insufficiency of three types of learning to explain language acquisition. Lingua 2008, 118:636-641.
11. Conway C., Christiansen M. Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science 2006, 17:905-912.
12. Curtin S., Mintz T., Christiansen M. Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition 2005, 96:233-262.
13. Endress A., Mehler J. The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:351-367.
14. Endress A., Nespor M., Mehler J. Perceptual and memory constraints in language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:348-353.
15. Fernandes T., Ventura P., Kolinsky R. Statistical information and coarticulation as cues to word boundaries: A matter of signal quality. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:856-864.
16. Finn A., Hudson Kam C. The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners' use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition 2008, 108:477-499.
17. Gebhart A., Aslin R., Newport E. Changing structures in midstream: Learning along the statistical garden path. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1087-1116.
18. Gervain J., Mehler J. Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology 2010, 61:191-218.
19. Gervain J., Nespor M., Mazuka R., Horie R., Mehler J. Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese-Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology 2008, 57:56-74.
20. Graf Estes K., Evans J., Alibali M., Saffran J. Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science 2007, 18:254-260.
21. Greenberg J. Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. Universals of human language 1978, Vol. 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
22. Hochmann J.R., Endress A., Mehler J. Word frequency as a cue for identifying function words in infancy. Cognition 2010, 115:444-457.
23. Johnson E., Jusczyk P. Word segmentation by eight-month-olds: When speech counts more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:548-567.
24. Johnson E., Seidl A. At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics. Developmental Science 2009, 12:131-141.
25. Johnson E., Tyler M. Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Developmental Science 2010, 13:339-345.
26. Jusczyk P., Houston D., Newsome M. The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 39:159-207.
27. Maye J., Werker J., Gerken L.A. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 2002, 82:B101-B111.
28. Nazzi T., Iakimova G., Bertoncini J., Frédonie S., Alcantara C. Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:283-299.
29. Newport E., Aslin R. Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 2004, 48:127-162.
30. Norris D., McQueen J., Cutler A., Butterfield S. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 34:191-243.
31. Ohala John.J. Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. Papers on the Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1990, 2:319-338.
32. Onishi K., Chambers K., Fisher C. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 2002, 83:B13-B23.
33. Peperkamp S., Le Calvez R., Nadal J.P., Dupoux E. The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition 2006, 101:B31-B41.
34. Rescorla R., Wagner A. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II 1972, Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY. H. Black, W. Prokasy (Eds.).
35. Saffran J. Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12:110-114.
36. Saffran J., Aslin R., Newport E. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 1996, 274:1926-1928.
37. Saffran J., Newport E., Aslin R. Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:606-621.
38. Shukla M., Nespor M., Mehler J. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 54:1-32.
39. Toro J.M., Sebastián-Gallés N., Mattys S. The role of perceptual salience during the segmentation of connected speech. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2009, 21:786-800.
40. Toro J.M., Sinnett S., Soto-Faraco S. Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition 2005, 97:B25-B34.
41. Thiessen E., Saffran J. When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries in 7- and 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 2003, 39:706-716.
42. Thiessen E., Saffran J. Learning to learn: Infants' acquisition of stress-based strategies for word segmentation. Language Learning and Development 2007, 3:73-100.
43. Turk-Browne N., Scholl B. Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:195-202.
44. Tyler M., Cutler A. Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 126:367-376.
45. van Heugten M., Johnson E. Linking infants' distributional learning abilities to natural language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63:197-209.
46. Weiss D., Gerfen C., Mitchel A. Speech segmentation in a simulated bilingual environment: A challenge of statistical learning?. Language Learning and Development 2009, 5:30-49.
47. Wheeler Max.W. The phonology of Catalan 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. Yang C. Universal grammar, statistics, or both?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:451-456.