Prospective study and multivariate analysis of the incidence of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 26, 2010, Pages

  Kaneyama, Shuichi ^a   Sumi, Masatoshi ^a   Kanatani, Takako ^a   Kasahara, Koichi ^a   Kanemura, Aritetsu ^a   Takabatake, Masato ^a   Nakatani, Tetsuya ^a   Yano, Tomonori ^a  

^a KOBE ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

cervical compression myelopathy; laminoplasty; logistic regression analysis; postoperative C5 palsy; prospective study; risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CERVICAL SPINE PALSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAMINOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION;

EID: 78650950141     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce873d     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hirabayashi K. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy [in Japanese]. Shujutsu 1978;32:1159-63.
2. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Watano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983;8:693-9.
3. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 1988;13:870-6.
4. Kurokawa T. Sagittal splitting of spinous process for enlargement of the spinal canal [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikei Geka 1982;2:234-40.
5. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine 2003;28:2447-51.
6. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2002;27:2108-15.
7. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y. Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine 2007;32:E197-202.
8. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, et al. Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty. Spine 2003;28:1972-7.
9. Shimizu T, Shimada H, Edakuni H. Post-laminoplasty palsy of upper extremities, with special reference to the spinal cord factors [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 1996;29:188-94.
10. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radicuropathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 1996;21:203-11.
11. Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 1998;23:2057-62.
12. Yonenobu K, Okada K, Fuji T, et al. Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 1986;11:818-23.
13. Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy [in Japanese]. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1994;68:490-503.
14. Ishihara A. Roentgenographic studies on the normal pattern of the cervical curvature [in Japanese]. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1968;42:1033-44.
15. Sunago K, Nakahara Y, Mitsuyama H, et al. Impairment of postoperative cervical nerve root for cervical compressive myelopathy [in Japanese]. Cent Jpn J Orthop Traumat 1991;34:227-8.
16. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop 1999;359:35-48.
17. Tsuzuki N, Tanaka H, Abe R, et al. Cervical radiculopathy occurring after the posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord [in Japanese]. Rinsho Seikei Geka 1991;26:525-34.
18. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Imasaki M, et al. Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 1991;16:1277-82.
19. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, et al. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003;28:2667-72.
20. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, et al. Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 1999;24:1527-32.
21. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, et al. Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 2005;30:2414-19.
22. Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, et al. Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 2009;34:274-9.
23. Kaneko K, Hashiguchi A, Kato Y, et al. Investigation of motor dominant C5 paralysis after laminoplasty from the results of evoked spinal cord responses. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:358-61.
24. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Kawaguchi H, et al. Postoperative expansion of intramedullary high-intensity areas on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 2004;29:1478-82.
25. De Vrind HH, Wondergem J, Haveman J. Hyperthermia-induced damage to rat sciatic nerve assessed in vivo with functional methods and with electrophysiology. J Neurosci Methods 1992;45:165-74.
26. De Vrind HH, Van Dan WM, Wondergem J, et al. Latent X-ray damage in the rat sciatic nerve results in delay in functional recovery after a heat treatment. Int J Radiat Biol 1993;63:83-9.
27. Tsuzuki N, Zhogshi L, Abe R, et al. Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. I: anatomical investigation of the mechanism of paralysis. Eur Spine J 1993;2:191-6. (Pubitemid 23363218)