Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 274-279

  Shiozaki, Takashi ^a   Otsuka, Hironori ^a   Nakata, Yoshihiro ^a   Yokoyama, Toru ^b   Takeuchi, Kazunari ^b   Ono, Atsushi ^b   Numasawa, Takuya ^b   Wada, Kanichiro ^b   Toh, Satoshi ^b  

^a Akita Social Insurance Hospital   (Japan)

^b HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

C5 palsy; Cervical laminoplasty; Cervical myelopathy; Posterior shift of the spinal cord

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DURA MATER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAMINOPLASTY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL PARALYSIS; ARM; BRACHIAL PLEXUS NEUROPATHY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISEASE COURSE; EDEMA; HISTOLOGY; INJURY; INNERVATION; LAMINECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PARALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICULOPATHY; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL ROOT; SPONDYLOSIS; TIME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRACHIAL PLEXUS NEUROPATHIES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DURA MATER; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADICULOPATHY; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL NERVE ROOTS; SPONDYLOSIS; TIME FACTORS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 64849093860     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e275     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenosis myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
2. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus lamin-oplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001;26:1443-8.
3. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop 2003;411:129-39.
4. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine 2003;28:2447-51.
5. Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, et al. Radiculopathy after lamin-oplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 1998;23:2057- 62.
6. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2002;27:2108-15.
7. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T,AburakawaS, et al. Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. Spine 2005;30:2544-9.
8. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, et al. Spinous process-splitting lamin-oplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer.Spine1992;17:S41-S3.
9. TomitaK, KawaharaN,Toribatake Y, et al. Expansive midline T-saw lamin-oplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine 1998;23:32-7.
10. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, et al. Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 2005;30:2414-9.
11. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, et al. Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 1999;24: 1527-32.
12. Hyakumachi T, Satoh E, Yoshimoto T, et al. Segmental motor paralysis so called C5 nerve palsy after cervical laminoplasty. J Jpn Spine Res Soc 2006; 17:21. (in Japanese)