Performance tests in people with chronic low back pain: Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 26, 2010, Pages

  Andersson, Eleonor I ^a   Lin, Christine C ^b   Smeets, Rob J E M ^c,d  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Adelante Zorggroep   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

low back pain; minimal clinically important change; performance test; responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLIMBING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT CHANGE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESPONSIVENESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SITTING; STANDING; WALKING;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFTING; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; WALKING;

EID: 78650933571     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cea12e     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84:95-103.
2. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Manniche C. Low back pain: what is the longterm course? A review of studies of general patient populations. Eur Spine J 2003;12:149-65.
3. Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Anrnett FC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the united states. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:778-99.
4. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary are: inception cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a171.
5. Rubin DI. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin 2007; 25:353-71.
6. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9-19.
7. Harding VR, Williams AC, Richardson PH, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 1994;58:367-75.
8. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998;23:2412-21.
9. Smeets RJ, Hijdra HJ, Kester AD, et al. The usability of six performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:989-98.
10. Smeets RJ, Van Geel AC, Kester AD, et al. Physical capacity tasks in chronic low back pain: what is the contributing role of cardiovascular capacity, pain and psychological factors? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:577-86.
11. Wittink H. Functional capacity testing in patient with chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2005;21:197-9.
12. Mayer TG, Barnes D, Nicholas G, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. II. A comparison with isokinetic lifting in a disabled chronic low-back pain industrial population. Spine 1988;13:998-1002.
13. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Barnes D, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. Erratum notice. Spine 1990;15:5.
14. Ljungquist T, Harms-Ringdhal K, Nygren Å, et al. Intra-and inter-rater reliability of an 11-test package for assessing dysfunction due to back or neck pain. Physiother Res Int 1999;4:214-32.
15. Ljungquist T, Nygren Å, Jensen I, et al. Physical performance tests for people with spinal pain-sensivitity to change. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:856-66. (Pubitemid 36818170)
16. Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, et al. Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct posttreatment result from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:5. doi:10.1186/471-2474-7-5.
17. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-4. (Pubitemid 13089565)
18. Mayer TG, Barnes D, Kishino ND, et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 1988;13:993-7.
19. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:163-70.
20. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996;63:71-6.
21. Ostelo RW, De Vet HC, Knol DL, et al. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:268-76.
22. Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C. Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain 1987;28:297-307.
23. Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijter JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;36:936-42.
24. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-32.
25. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:897-906.
26. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12:142-58.
27. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, et al. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 2007;7:541-6.
28. Terwee CB, Bot SD, Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
29. van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patient with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2006;31:578-82.
30. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:82. doi:10.1186/471-2474-7-82.
31. Demoulin C, Ostelo RW, Knottnerus JA, et al. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 2009. doi:101016/j.ejpain. 2009.04.007.
32. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2007;32:2915-20.