Magnetic resonance image analysis of meniscal translation and tibio-menisco-femoral contact in deep knee flexion

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 673-684

  Yao, Jiang ^a   Lancianese, Sarah L ^a   Hovinga, Kristen R ^a   Lee, Jordan ^b   Lerner, Amy L ^a  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

In vivo deep flexion; Joint contact; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meniscus

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INJURY; KNEE MENISCUS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UPREGULATION; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; FEMUR; KNEE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 43649096312     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20553     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE, et al. 1998. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 356: 47-57.
2. Watanabe T, Yamazaki T, Sugamoto K, et al. 2004. In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion. J Orthop Res 22:1044-1049.
3. McMillan G, Nichols L. 2005. Osteoarthritis and meniscus disorders of the knee as occupational diseases of miners. Occup Environ Med 62:567-575.
4. Yoshida S, Aoyagi K, Felson DT, et al. 2002. Comparison of the prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee and hand between Japan and the United States. J Rheumatol 29:1454-1458.
5. Zhang Y, Xu L, Nevitt MC, et al. 2001. Comparison of the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis between the elderly Chinese Population in Beijing and Whites in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 44:2065-2071.
6. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, et al. 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1196-1198.
7. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 3:full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1199-1200.
8. Li G, DeFrate LE, Park SE, et al. 2005. In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 33:102-107.
9. Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, et al. 1991. Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruc tion of magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 19:210-216.
10. Vedi V, Williams A, Tennant SJ, et al. 1999. Meniscal movement: An in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:37-41.
11. Kwok WE, Zhong J, You Z, et al. 2003. A four-element phased array coil for high resolution and parallel MR imaging of the knee. Magn Reson Imaging 21:961-967.
12. Besl PJ, McKay ND. 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:239-256.
13. Lerner AL, Tamez-Pena JG, Houck JR, et al. 2003. The use of sequential MR image sets for determining tibiofemoral motion. J Biomech Eng 125:246-253.
14. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions. J Biomech Eng 105:136-144.
15. Yao J, Snibbe J, Maloney M, et al. 2006. Stresses and strains in the medial meniscus of an ACL deficient knee under anterior loading: a finite element analysis with image-based experimental validation. J Biomech Eng 128:135-141.
16. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, et al. 2004. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86:1721-1729.
17. Ahmed AM, Burke DL. 1983. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints - part I: tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:216-225.
18. Thambyah A, Goh CCH, Das De S. 2005. Contact stresses in the knee joint in deep flexion. Med Eng Phys 27:329-335.
19. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. 1998. Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:556-569.
20. Nagura T, Matsumoto H, Kiriyama Y, et al. 2006. Tibiofemoral joint contact force in deep knee flexion and its consideration in knee osteoarthritis and joint replacement. J Appl Biomech 22:305-313.
21. Wilson DR, Feikes JD, Zavatsky AB, et al. 2000. The components of passive knee movement are coupled to flexion angle. J Biomech 33:465-473.
22. Li G, Zayontz S, DeFrate LE, et al. 2004. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 22:90-95.
23. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. 2002. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg[Br] 82:1189-1195.
24. Hemmerich A, Brown H, Smith S, et al. 2006. Hip, knee and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 24:770-781.
25. Todo S, Kadoya Y, Moilanen T, et al. 1999. Anteroposterior and rotational movement of femur during knee flexion. Clin Orthop 362:162-170.
26. Scarvell JM, Smith PN, Refshauge KM, et al. 2004. Evaluation of a method to map tibiofemoral contact points in the normal knee using MRI. J Orthop Res 22:788-793.
27. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. 2003. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop 410:69-81.
28. Williams A, Logan M. 2004. Understanding tibio-femoral motion. Knee 11:81-88.