Questioning consensus, cultivating conflict

Journal of Management Inquiry

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 18-30

  De Cock, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bakhtin; Paradigm wars; Pluralism; Politics; Relevance debates

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944478666     PISSN: 10564926     EISSN: 15526542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1056492605276848     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Astley, W. G., & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3, 443-460.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin(C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: Texas University Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bartunek, J. M. (2002). The proper place of organizational scholarship: A comment on Hinings and Greenwood. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 422-427.
6. Benjamin, W. (1999). Selected writings, Vol. 2, 1927-1940. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
7. Böhm, S. (2002). Movements of theory and practice. Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, 2, 328-352.
8. Boland, R. J., Singh, J., Salipante, P., Aram, J., Fay, S. Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 393-417.
9. Bouchikhi, H., & Kimberly, J. R. (2001). "It's difficult to innovate": The death of the tenured professor and the birth of the knowledge entrepreneur. Human Relations, 54, 77-84.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Vive la crise: For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 17, 773-787.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Thinking about limits. Theory, Culture, and Society, 9, 37-49.
12. Burkitt, I. (1998). Bodies of knowledge: Beyond Cartesian views of persons, selves and mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 28, 63-82.
13. Burrell, G. (1996). Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 642-658). London: Sage.
14. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann.
15. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 649-671.
16. Case, P. (2003). From objectivity to subjectivity: Pursuing subjective authenticity in organizational research. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 156-179). Oxford, UK Basil: Blackwell.
17. Chia, R. (1996). The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization. Organization, 3, 31-58.
18. Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Clegg, S. (2002). "Lives in the balance": A comment on Hinings and Greenwood's "Disconnects and consequences in organization theory?" Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 428-441.
20. Clegg, S. R., & Hardy, C. (1996). Organizations, organization and organizing. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 1-29). London: Sage.
21. Culler, J. (2001). The pursuit of signs. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1981)
22. Czarniawska, B. (2001). Having hope in paralogy. Human Relations, 54 (1). 13-21.
23. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (1990). Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 1, 1-9.
24. De Cock, C., & Volkmann, C. (2002). Of language, limits and secrets. Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, 2, 357-371.
25. Deetz, S. (1995). The social production of knowledge and the commercial artifact. In L. L. Cummings (Ed.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (pp. 44-63). London: Sage.
26. Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 1-46). London: Sage.
27. de Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: Anintroduction. London: Verso.
29. Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.) Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
30. Eco, U. (1992). Reply. In S. Collini (Ed.), Interpretation and overinterpretation (pp. 139-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Elsbach, K. D., Sutton, R. I., & Whetten, D. A. (1999). Perspectives on developing management theory, circa 1999: Moving from shrill monologues to (relatively) tame dialogues. Academy of Management Review, 24, 627-633.
32. Fabian, H. F. (2000). Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Academy of Management Review, 25, 350-371.
33. Frost, P. J. (2002). Afterword. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 21-22.
34. Fuller, S. (2003). Interdisciplinarity: The loss of heroic vision in the marketplace of ideas. Available from www.interdisciplines.org/ interdisciplinarity/papers/3
35. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
36. Gioia, D. A. (2003). Give it up! Reflections on the interpreted world (A commentary on Meckler and Baillie). Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 285-292.
37. Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15, 584-560.
38. Glynn, M. A., Barr, P. S., & Dacin, M. T. (2000). Pluralism and the problem of variety. Academy of Management Review, 25, 726-734.
39. Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan. British Journal of Management, 12, S27 - S32.
40. Hambrick, D. (1994). What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11-17.
41. Hardy, C. (2002). Onthe edge of a pluralistic world. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 16-18.
42. Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Clegg, S. (2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: Astudy of the production of the research "subject." Human Relations, 54, 531-560.
43. Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411-421.
44. Horgan, J. (1997). The end of science. New York: Broadway Books.
45. Huff, A. S. (2000). Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25, 288-293.
46. Jacques, R. (1992). Critique and theory building: Producing knowledge "from the kitchen". Academy of Management Review, 17, 582-606.
47. Jones, C. (2003). Theory after the postmodern condition. Organization, 10, 503-525.
48. Kilduff, M., & Mehra, A. (1997). Postmodernism and organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 22, 453-481.
49. Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-15). London: Basil Blackwell.
50. Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 672-690.
51. Lounsbury, M. (2003). The death of organization science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 293-298.
52. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53. March, J. (2000). Citigroup's John Reed and Stanford's James March on management research and practice. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 52-64.
54. Martin, J. (1992). Escaping the inherent conservatism of empirical organizational research. In P. Frost & R. Stablein (Eds.), Doing exemplary research (pp. 233-239). London: Sage.
55. Meckler, M., & Baillie, J. (2003a). The truth about social constructionism in administrative science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 273-284.
56. Meckler, M., & Baillie, J. (2003b). You can't handle the truth: A response to Gioia and Lounsbury. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 299-303.
57. Mohrman, S. (2001). Seize the day: Organizational studies can and should make a difference. Human Relations, 54, 57-65.
58. Mohrman, S., Gibson, C., & Mohrman, A. (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: Amodel and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 357-375.
59. Mowday, R. T. (1997). Reaffirming our scholarly values. Academy of Management Review, 22, 335-345.
60. Parker, M. (1992). Post-modern organizations or post-modern organization theory? Organization Studies, 13, 1-17.
61. Pettigrew, A. (2001). Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12, S61 - S70.
62. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
63. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (1999). Knowing what to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. California Management Review, 41, 83-108.
64. Poole, B. (2001). From phenomenology to dialogue: Max Scheler's phenomenological tradition and Mikhail Bakhtin's development from "Toward a philosophy of the act" to his study of Dostoevsky. In K. Hirschkop & D. Shepherd (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (2nd ed., pp. 109-135). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
65. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
66. Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 21, 529-557.
67. Shepherd, D. (2001). Bakhtin and the reader. In K. Hirschkop & D. Shepherd (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (2nd ed., pp. 136-154). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
68. Shotter, J., & Billig, M. (1998). A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In M. Gardiner & M. Mayerfeld Bell (Eds.), Bakhtin and the human sciences (pp. 13-29). London: Sage.
69. Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12, S3 - S26.
70. Steiner, G. (2001). Grammars of creation. London: Faber & Faber.
71. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.
72. Tranfield, D., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9, 341-353.
73. Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). The buzzing, blooming, confusing world of organization and management theory: A view from Lake Wobegon University. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 118-125.
74. Van de Ven, A. H. (2002). Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This Academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27, 171-184.
75. Van Maanen, J. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133-143.
76. Vickers, G. (1995). The art of judgment: Astudy of policy making. London: Sage.
77. Weaver, G. R., & Gioia, D. A. (1994). Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs. structurationist inquiry. Organization Studies, 15, 565-590.
78. Weber, S. (2001). Institution and interpretation: Expanded edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
79. Weick, K. E. (1999). Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review, 24, 797-806.
80. Weick, K. E. (2001). Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British Journal of Management, 12, S71 - S75.
81. Westwood, R., & Clegg, S. (2003). The discourse of organization studies: Dissensus, politics, and paradigms. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 1-42). London: Basil Blackwell.
82. White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
83. Žižek, S. (2000). The fragile absolute or why is the Christian legacy worth fighting for? London: Verso.
84. Žižek, S. (2002). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor (2nd ed.). London: Verso. (Original work published 1991)