Eco-evolutionary metapopulation dynamics and the spatial scale of adaptation

American Naturalist

Volumn 177, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 29-43

  Hanski, Ilkka ^a   Mononen, Tommi ^a   Ovaskainen, Otso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cost of maladaptation; Eco evolutionary dynamics; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat specialization; Local adaptation; Network adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; COLONIZATION; DEMOGRAPHY; EXTINCTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT TYPE; HETEROGENEITY; LANDSCAPE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIALIZATION; STOCHASTICITY;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES EXTINCTION; STATISTICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ECOSYSTEM; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 78650857348     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/657625     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bolnick, D. I., E. J. Caldera, and B. Matthews. 2008. Evidence for asymmetric migration load in a pair of ecologically divergent stickleback populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 273-287.
2. Byars, S. G., Y. Parsons, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2009. Effect of altitude on the genetic structure of an Alpine grass, Poa hiemata. Annals of Botany 103:885-899.
3. Dennis, R. L. H., and H. T. Eales. 1999. Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data. Biological Conservation 87:295-301.
4. Diamond, J. M. 1984. "Normal" extinctions of isolated populations. Pages 191-246 in M. H. Nitecki, ed. Extinctions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Edelaar, P., A. M. Siepielski, and J. Clobert. 2008. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462-2472.
6. Etienne, R. S., C. J. F. van ter Braak, and C. C. Vos. 2004. Application of stochastic patch occupancy models to real metapopulations. Pages 105-132 in I. Hanski and O. E. Gaggiotti, eds. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam.
7. Fleishman, E., C. Ray, P. Sjögren-Gulve, C. L. Boggs, and D. D. Murphy. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology 16:706-716.
8. Foley, P. 1994. Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. Conservation Biology 8:124-137.
9. -. 1997. Extinction models for local populations. Pages 215-246 in I. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, eds. Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
10. Gandon, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2002. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:451-462.
11. Gandon, S., Y. Capowiez, Y. Dubois, Y. Michalakis, and I. Olivieri. 1996. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1003-1009.
12. Gomulkiewicz, R., R. D. Holt, and M. Barfield. 1999. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theoretical Population Biology 55:283-296.
13. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
14. -. 1998. Connecting the parameters of local extinction and metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 83:390-396.
15. -. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. -. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88:372-381.
17. Hanski, I., and M. Heino. 2003. Metapopulation-level adaptation of insect host plant preference and extinction-colonization dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Theoretical Population Biology 64: 281-290.
18. Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755-758.
19. -. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theoretical Population Biology 64:119-127.
20. Hanski, I., and M. Singer. 2001. Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. AmericanNaturalist 158:341-353.
21. Heino, M., and I. Hanski. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist 157: 495-511.
22. Hendry, A. P., T. Day, and E. B. Taylor. 2001. Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution 55: 459-466.
23. Holt, R. D. 1996. Adaptive environments in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density dependence on niche evolution. Oikos 75:182-192.
24. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 6:433-447.
25. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1997. How does immigration influence local adaptation? a reexamination of a familiar paradigm. American Naturalist 149:563-572.
26. Kawecki, T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evolutionary Ecology 9:38-44.
27. Klemme, I., and I. Hanski. 2009. Heritability of and strong single gene (Pgi) effects on life-history traits in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:1944-1953.
28. Kuussaari, M., M. Singer, and I. Hanski. 2000. Local specialization and landscape-level influence on host use in an herbivorous insect. Ecology 81:2177-2187.
29. Laine, A. L. 2005. Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant-pathogen metapopulation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:930-938.
30. Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist 142:911-927.
31. Lande, R., and S. Shannon. 1996. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50:434-437.
32. Leimu, R., and M. Fischer. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3:e4010.
33. Moilanen, A. 2004. SPOMSIM: software for stochastic patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 179:533-550.
34. Morgan, A. D., S. Gandon, and A. Buckling. 2005. The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host-parasite system. Nature 437:253-256.
35. Nieminen, M., M. Siljander, and I. Hanski. 2004. Structure and dynamics of Melitaea cinxia metapopulations. Pages 63-91 in P. R. Ehrlich and I. Hanski, eds. On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
36. North, A., J. Pennanen, O. Ovaskainen, and A. L. Laine. 2011. Local adaptation in a changing world: the roles of gene flow, mutation, and sexual reproduction. Evolution, doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646 .2010.01107.x.
37. Nosil, P. 2009. Adaptive population divergence in cryptic color pattern following a reduction in gene flow. Evolution 63:1902-1912.
38. Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2002. Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation. Theoretical Population Biology 61:285-295.
39. -. 2003. How much does an individual habitat fragment contribute to metapopulation dynamics and persistence? Theoretical Population Biology 64:481-495.
40. -. 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. Pages 73-104 in I. Hanski and O. E. Gaggiotti, eds. Ecology, genetics, and evolution in metapopulations. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam.
41. Ovaskainen, O., and B. Meerson. 2010. Stochastic models of population extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:643-652.
42. Pelletier, F., D. Garant, and A. P. Hendry. 2009. Eco-evolutionary dynamics: introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364:1483-1489.
43. Räsänen, K., and A. P. Hendry. 2008. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecology Letters 11:624-636.
44. Riechert, S. E. 1993. Investigation of potential gene flow limitation of behavioral adaptation in an aridland spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:355-363.
45. Ronce, O., and M. Kirkpatrick. 2001. When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55: 1520-1531.
46. Saccheri, I., and I. Hanski. 2006. Natural selection and population dynamics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:341-347.
47. Schoener, T. E., and D. A. Spiller. 1987. High population persistence in a system with high turnover. Nature 330:474-477.
48. Singer, M. C., and I. Hanski. 2004. Dispersal behavior and evolutionary metapopulation dynamics. Pages 181-198 in P. R. Ehrlich and I. Hanski, eds. On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
49. Slatkin, M. 1977. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theoretical Population Biology 12:253-262.
50. Thomas, J. A., N. A. D. Bourn, R. T. Clarke, K. E. Stewart, D. J. Simcox, G. S. Pearman, R. Curtis, and B. Goodger. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:1791-1796.
51. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
52. Thompson, J. N., S. L. Nuismer, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2002. Coevolution and maladaptation. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:381-387.
53. Thrall, P. H., J. J. Burdon, and J. D. Bever. 2002. Local adaptation in the Linum marginale-Melampsora lini host-pathogen interaction. Evolution 56:1340-1351.
54. Toju, H. 2008. Fine-scale local adaptation of weevil mouthpart length and camellia pericarp thickness: altitudinal gradient of a putative arms race. Evolution 62:1086-1102.
55. Tufto, J. 2000. Quantitative genetic models for the balance between migration and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research 76:285-293.
56. Yeaman, S., and F. Guillaume. 2009. Predicting adaptation under migration load: the role of genetic skew. Evolution 63:2926-2938.