Information use in art: A citation analysis of sources used in art theses in Turkey

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-81

  Uçak, Nazan Özenç ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650854308     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cobbledick Susie The information seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews. The Library Quarterly 1996, 66:343-371.
2. Stone Sue Humanities scholars: information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation 1982, 38:292-313.
3. Hemming William S. The information seeking behavior of visual artists: a literature review. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64:343-362.
4. Toyne D. Requests at Falmouth School of Art. ARLIS Newsletter 1975, 24:7-9.
5. Stone, "Humanities scholars: information needs and uses".
6. Cobbledick, "The information seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews".
7. Reed B., Tanner D.R. Information needs and library services for the fine arts faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, 27:229-233.
8. Gregory Tori R. Under served or under surveyed: The information needs of studio art faculty in the southwestern United States. Art Documentation 2007, 26:57-66.
9. Mithat Zencir, "Güzel SanatlarAlanindaki Kullanicilarin Bilgi Gereksinimlerive Bilgi Kullanim Özellikleri: Hacettepe Üniversitesi ÖrneǦi (Information Needs and Uses in Arts: An Example of Hacettepe University)", Unpublised master thesis. (Ankara: Hacettepe University, 2007).
10. Cobbledick, "The information seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews".
11. Nazan Özenç Uçak, "BilimAdamlarininBilgiAramaDavraniŞlariveBunlariEtkileyenNedenler (Information Seeking Behaviors of Scholars and Causes Affecting Them", Unpublished PhD thesis, (Ankara: Hacettepe University, 1997).
12. Uçak Nazan Özenç, Al Umut The differences among disciplines in scholarly communication: a bibliometric analysis of theses. Libri 2009, 59:166-179.
13. Uçak Nazan Özenç, Al Umut Bilimseliletişiminzamanagöredeǧişimi: biratifanaliziçalişmasi (Changes in scholarly communication over time: a citation analysis study). BilgiDünyasi/Information World 2009, 10:1-22.
14. Gregory, "Under served or under surveyed: The information needs of studio art faculty in the southwestern United Sates".
15. Stam D.C. Artists and art libraries. Art Libraries Journal 1995, 20:21-25.
16. Technology's impact on the information seeking behavior of art historians. Art Documentation 2002, 21:35-42. Trish Rose.
17. Frank P. Student artists in the library: An investigation of how they use general academic libraries for their creative needs. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 1999, 25:445-455.
18. Pacey P. How art students use libraries, if they do. Art Libraries Journal 1982, 7:33-38.
19. Nilsen M. Client-centered services in a branch library. Art Documentation 1986, 5:151-153.
20. Layne S.S. Artists, art historians and visual art information. The Reference Librarian 1994, 47:23-35.
21. Zencir, "Güzel Sanatlar Alanindaki Kullanicilarin Bilgi Gereksinimlerive Bilgi Kullanim Özellikleri: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Örneǧi (Information Needs and Uses in Arts: An Example of Hacettepe University)".
22. Gregory, "Under served or under surveyed: The information needs of studio art faculty in the southwestern United Sates".
23. Cobbledick, "The information seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews".
24. Dane W.J. Public art libraries and artists and designers: a symbiotic scheme for success. Art Libraries Journal 1987, 12:29-33.
25. Gregory, "Under served or under surveyed: The information needs of studio art faculty in the southwestern United Sates".
26. Cowan Sandra, Branigan Thiomas Informing visual poetry: Information needs and sources of artists. Art Documentation 2004, 23:14-20.
27. Uçak, "Bilim Adamlarinin Bilgi Arama Davranişlarive Bunlari Etkileyen Nedenler (Information Seeking Behaviors of Scholars and Causes Affecting Them)".
28. M. J. Bates, Information needs and seeking of scholars and artists in relation to multimedia materials. Available (October 12, 2009). http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/scholars.html.
29. Zencir, "Güzel Sanatlar Alanindaki Kullanicilarin Bilgi Gereksinimlerive Bilgi Kullanim Özellikleri: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Örneǧi (Information Needs and Uses in Arts: An Example of HacettepeUniversit)".
30. Cobbledick, "The information seeking behavior of artists: exploratory interviews".
31. Rose, "Technology's impact on the information seeking behavior of art historians".
32. Bowman John Communities of practice: Web 2.0 principles for service in art libraries. Art Documentation 2008, 27:4-12.
33. Işbilen A. Türkiye'de sanat eǧitiminde öǧretmen yetiştirme (Teacher training in arts education in Turkey). Sanat Eǧitimi Sempozyumu 2002, 137-150. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
34. Terwiel Candan Dizdar Türkiye'de seramik sanatinin kurumsallaşmasi/Institutionalization of the art of ceramics in Turkey. Seramik Federasyon Dergisi/Journal of Turkish 2008, 24:118-123.
35. Çobanli Zehra Sanat eǧitiminin gelişimi ve bu gelişim içinde Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi G.S.F. Örneşi (The development of art education and Anadolu University Faculty of Fine Arts). Anadolu Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Sempozyumu 1995, 27-38. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
36. Uçan Ali Türkiye'de güzel sanatlar fakültelerinin yeniden yapilanmasi ve eǧitim programlarinin yeniden düzenlenmesi (Reconstruction of fine arts schools and reorganization of their training programs in Turkey). Anadolu Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Sempozyumu 1995, 115-126. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
37. Yüksek Öǧretim Istatistikleri(Higher Education Stasistics), ( June 21, 2010). http://www.osym.gov.tr.
38. Al Umut, Şahiner Mustafa, Tonta Yaşar Arts and humanities literature: bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1011-1022.
39. Lindholm-Romantschuk Y., Warner J. The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation 1996, 52:389-404.
40. Uçak Nazan Özenç, Al Umut Sosyalbilimtezlerininatifanalizi. (Citation characteristics of social sciences theses). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi/Journal of Faculty of Letters 2008, 25:223-240.
41. Nazan Özenç Uçak, and Umut Al, "The differences among disciplines in scholarly communication: a bibliometric analysis of theses".
42. Nazan Özenç Uçak, and Umut Al, "Bilimseliletişiminzamanagöredeǧişimi: biratifanaliziçalişmasi (Changes in scholarly communication over time: a citation analysis study)".
43. Sangam S.L. Obsolescence of literature in the field of psychology. Scientometrics 1998, 44:33-46.
44. Glänzel W., Schoepflin U. A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science 1995, 21:37-53.
45. Nazan Özenç Uçak, and Umut Al, "Sosyalbilimtezlerininatifanalizi. (Citation characteristics of social sciences theses)".
46. Nazan Özenç Uçak, and Umut Al, "The differences among disciplines in scholarly communication: a bibliometric analysis of theses".
47. Nazan Özenç Uçak, and Umut Al, "Bilimseliletişiminzamanagöredeǧişimi: biratifanaliziçalişmasi (Changes in scholarly communication over time: a citation analysis study)",.
48. Al Umut Çokyazarliliǧinbilimseliletişimdekiyeri. (The place of multiple-authored in scholarly communication). Prof. Dr. NilüferTuncer'eArmaǧan 2005, 31-41. TKD, Ankara. M. EminKüçük (Ed.).
49. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2001, 52:558-569.
50. Gordon M.D. A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication. Scientometrics 1980, 2:193-201.