The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 389-404

  Lindholm Romantschuk, Ylva ^a,b   Warner, Julian ^a,b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030488383     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb026972     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. OPPENHEIM, C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, 51, 1995, 18-27.
2. SENG, L.B. and WILLETT, P. The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools. Journal of Information Science, 21, 1995, 68-71.
3. NARIN, F. Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Cherry Hill, New Jersey: Computer Horizons Inc., 1976.
4. MERTON, R. The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
5. LATOUR, B. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.
6. BAZERMAN, C. Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.
7. COZZENS, S.E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics, 15, 1989, 437-447.
8. WILSON, P. Secon-hand knowledge: an enquiry into cognitive authority. London and Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1983.
9. KRETSCHMER, H. and MULLER, R.A. Contribution to the dispute on the Ortega hypothesis: connection between publication rate and stratification of scientists, tested by various methods. Scientometrics, 18, 1990, 43-56.
10. LINDHOLM-ROMANTSCHUK, Y. The flow of ideas within and among academic disciplines: scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and the humanities. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1994.
11. AMSTERDAMSKA, O. and LEYDESDORFF, L. Citations: indicators of significance? Scientometrics, 15, 1989, 449-471.
12. OPPENHEIM, C. and RENN, S.P. Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 1978, 225-231.
13. CRANE, D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
14. ROGERS, E.M. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd edition. New York: The Free Press, 1983.
15. FOUCAULT, M. What is an author? In: RABINOW, P., ed. The Foucault reader. London etc.: Penguin Books, 1984, 101-120.
16. MACROBERTS, M.H. and MACROBERTS, B.R. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 1989, 342-349.
17. Scholarly communication: the report of the National Enquiry. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
18. ZUCKERMAN, H. Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12, 1987, 329-338.
19. SIONORILE, V. Buridan's Ass: the statistical rhetoric of science and the problem of equiprobability. In: SIMONS, H.W., ed. Rhetoric in the human sciences. London etc.: Sage, 1989, 69-88.
20. SEGLEN, P.O. The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 1992, 628-638.
21. GLÄNZEL, W. and SCHOEPFLIN, U. A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21, 1995, 37-53.
22. HICKS, D. and POTTER, J. Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or Science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science, 21, 1991, 459-501.
23. BATH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. Towards the improvement of social science information systems: overview of research carried out 1971-1975. Bath: Bath University Library, 1980. (Investigation into the information requirements of researchers of the social sciences, Research report 1)