Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE

Medical Education

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 183-191

  Moineau, Geneviève ^a   Power, Barbara ^a   Pion, Anne Marie J ^a   Wood, Timothy J ^a   Humphrey Murto, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 78650846542     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03800.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Petrusa ER. Clinical performance assessments. In: Norman G, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002:673-709.
2. Humphrey-Murto S, Smee S, Touchie C, Wood TJ, Blackmore D. A comparison of physician examiners and trained assessors in a high-stakes OSCE setting. Acad Med 2005;10 (Suppl):59-62.
3. Martin JA, Reznick RK, Rothman A, Tamblyn R, Regehr G. Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination? Acad Med 1996;71 (2):170-5.
4. Adamo G. Simulated and standardised patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Med Teach 2003;25 (3):262-70.
5. Leamon MH, Servis ME, Canning RD, Searles RC. A comparison of student evaluations and faculty peer evaluations of faculty lectures. Acad Med 1999;10 (Suppl):22-4.
6. Freedman JA, Lehmann HP, Harold P, Ogborn CJ. Web-based peer evaluation by medical students. Acad Med 2000;75 (5):539-40.
7. Arnold L, Willoughby L, Calkins V, Gammon L, Eberhart G. Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. J Med Educ 1981;56:35-42.
8. Chenot JF, Simmenroth-Nayda A, Koch A, Fischer T, Scherer M, Emmert B, Stanske B, Kochen MM, Himmel W. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination? Med Educ 2007;41:1032-8.
9. Ogden GR, Green M, Ker JS. The use of interprofessional peer examiners in an objective structured clinical examination: can dental students act as examiners? Br Dent J 2000;189 (3):160-4.
10. Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Nandagopal K, Eva KW. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during objective structured clinical examinations? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:189-99.
11. Dauphinee WD, Blackmore DE, Smee S, Rothman AI, Reznick R. Using the judgements of physician examiners in setting standards for a national multicentre high-stakes OSCE. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1997;2:201-11.
12. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250:777-81.
13. Rothman AI, Cusimano M. A comparison of physician examiners', standardised patients', and communication experts' ratings of international medical graduates' English proficiency. Acad Med 2000;75 (12):1206-1211.
14. Calhoun JG, Woolliscroft JO, Haken JD, Wolf FM, Davis WK. Evaluating medical student clinical skills performance. Eval Health Prof 1988;2 (11):201-12.
15. Rees C, Sheard C, McPherson A. Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the University of Nottingham. Med Educ 2002;36:868-78.