Methodological approaches to measuring the effects of implementation of health information technology (HIT)

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Roberts, Lance ^a   Ward, Marcia M ^a   Brokel, Jane M ^a,b   Wakefield, Douglas S ^c   Crandall, Donald K ^b   Conlon, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Trinity Health   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACHES; BEFORE AND AFTER; CLINICAL EFFICACIES; CONTROL UNITS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; HEALTH CARE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES; MIXED EFFECTS MODELS; PIECE WISE; RESEARCH DESIGNS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL APPROACHES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

HOSPITALS;

EID: 78650761036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.307     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Crandall DK, Brokel JM, Schwichtenberg T, et al. Redesigning Care Delivery through Health IT Implementation: Exploring Trinity's IT Model. The Journal of Healthcare Information Management. Fall 2007;21(4):41-48.
2. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. New England Journal of Medicine. February 7, 1991;324(6):377-384.
3. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado. Medical Care. March 2000;38(3):261-271.
4. Aspden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman JL, Cronenwett LR. (Eds.), Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2007.
5. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Vander Vliet MB, Schneider J, Leape LL. Relationship between Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events Journal of General Internal Medicine. April, 1995;10(4):199-205.
6. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, et al. Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Pediatric Inpatients. JAMA. April 25, 2001;285(16):2114- 2120.
7. Chaudhry B, Jerome W, Shinyi W, et al. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144(10):742-752.
8. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support Systems on Medication Safety: A Systematic Review. Archives of Internal Medicine. June 23, 2003;163(12):1409-1416.
9. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 132. (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0003.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E006. Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2006.
10. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
11. Leape LL, Berwick DM, Bates DW. What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety. JAMA. July 24, 2002;288(4):501-507.
12. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. Safe but Sound: Patient Safety Meets Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA. July 24, 2002;288(4):508-513.
13. Ash J, Gorman P, Hersh W. Physician Order Entry in U.S. Hospitals. Proceedings American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium. 1998:235-239.
14. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Medication Error Prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. July 1, 1999;6(4):313-321.
15. Massaro T. Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center, II. Impact on Medical Education. Acad Med. January, 1993;68(1):25-30.
16. Reid PP, Compton DW, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G. Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2005.
17. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
18. Isaac S, Michael WB. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services; 1997.
19. Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the General Linear Mixed Model to Analyze Unbalanced Repeated Measures and Longitudinal Data. Statistics in Medicine. 1997;16(20):2349-2380.
20. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB. Statistical Analysis of Repeated Measures Data Using SAS Procedures. Journal of Animal Science. April 1, 1998;76(4):1216-1231.
21. Littell RC, Pendergast J, Natarajan R. Modeling Covariance Structure in the Analysis of Repeated Measures Data. Statistics in Medicine. 2000;19(13):1793-1819
22. Singer JD. Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. Winter 1998;23(4):323-355.