Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 13, 2000, Pages 1793-1819

  Littell, Ramon C ^a   Pendergast, Jane ^b   Natarajan, Ranjini ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOSTATISTICS; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0034661772     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1793::AID-SIM482>3.0.CO;2-Q     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyze unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:2349-2380.
2. Dixon WJ, (ed.). BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Volume 2. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, 1988.
3. R Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6. 12. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, 1997.
4. Diggle PJ. An approach to the analysis of repeated measures. Biometrics 1988; 44:959-971.
5. Wolfinger RD. Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Communications in Statistics, Simulation and Computation 1993; 22(4): 1079-1106.
6. Dawson KS, Gennings C, Carter WH. Two graphical techniques useful in detecting correlation structure in repeated measures data. American Statistician 1997; 45:275-283.
7. Milliken GA, Johnson DE. Analysis of Messy Data, Volume 1: Designed Experiments. Chapman and Hall: New York, 1992.
8. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE. Variance Components. Wiley: New York, 1991.
9. Cressie NAC. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley: New York, 1991.
10. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic control 1974; AC-19:716-723.
11. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978; 6:461-464.
12. Kass RE, Wasserman L. A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90:928-934.
13. Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics 1976; 1:69-82.
14. Greenhouse SS, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959; 32:95-112.
15. R System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, 1996.
16. Robinson GK. That BLUP is a good thing-the estimation of random effect. Statistical Science 1991; 6:15-51.
17. Puntanen S, Styan GPH. On the equality of the ordinary least squares estimator and the best linear unbiased estimator. American Statistician 1989; 43:153-164.
18. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley: New York, 1987.
19. Graybill FA. Theory and Application of the Linear Model. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA, 1976.
20. Fai AHT, Cornelius PL. Approximate F-tests of multiple degrees of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyses of unbalanced split-plot experiments. Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulation 1996; 54:363-378.
21. McLean RA, Sanders WL. Approximating degrees of freedom for standard errors in mixed linear models. In Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section. American Statistical Association, 50-59.
22. Hulting FL, Harville DA. Some Bayesian and non-Bayesian procedures for the analysis of comparative experiments and for small area estimation: computational aspects, frequentist properties, and relationships. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1991; 86:557-568.
23. Diggle PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press: New York, 1994.
24. Verbeke G, Molenberghs B. Linear Mixed Models in Practice. Springer: New York, 1997.