Uncoupling direct and indirect plant defences: Novel opportunities for improving crop security in willow plantations

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 139, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 528-533

  Stenberg, Johan A ^a   Lehrman, Anna ^a   Björkman, Christer ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioenergy crop; Cropping security; Defence syndromes; Indirect defence; Intraguild predation; Optimal defence

Indexed keywords

BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOENERGY; CLONE; DECIDUOUS FOREST; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GENOTYPE; INSECT; INSECTICIDE; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PLANTATION FORESTRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TRADE-OFF; YIELD RESPONSE;

ANTHOCORIS MEMORUM; COLEOPTERA; PHRATORA VULGATISSIMA; SALIX;

EID: 78650734423     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agrawal A.A., Kobayashi C., Thaler J.S. Influence of prey availability and induced host-plant resistance on omnivory by western flower thrips. Ecology 1999, 80:518-523.
2. Agrawal A.A. Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:103-109.
3. Bell A.C., Clawson S., Watson S. The long-term effect of partial defoliation on the yield of short-rotation coppice willow. Annals of Applied Biology 2006, 48:97-103.
4. Björkman C., Höglund S., Eklund K., Larsson S. Effects of leaf beetle damage on stem wood production in coppicing willow. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2000, 2:131-139.
5. Björkman C., Dalin P., Eklund K. Generalist natural enemies of a willow leaf beetle (Phratora vulgatissima): abundance and feeding habits. Journal of Insect Behavior 2003, 16:747-764.
6. Björkman C., Bommarco R., Eklund K., Höglund S. Harvesting disrupts biological control of herbivores in a short-rotation coppice system. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:1624-1633.
7. Björkman C., Eklund K. Factors affecting willow leaf beetles (Phratora vulgatissima) when selecting overwintering sites. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2006, 8:97-101.
8. Coll M. Feeding and ovipositing on plants by an omnivorous insect predator. Oecologia 1996, 105:214-220.
9. Coll M., Guershon M. Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annual Review of Entomology 2002, 47:267-297.
10. Crawley M.J. Statistical Computing: an Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus 2002, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester.
11. Dalin P., Kindvall O., Björkman C. Reduced population control of an insect pest in managed willow monocultures. PLoS One 2009, 4(1-6):e5487.
12. Eubanks M.D., Denno R.F. Host plants mediate omnivore-herbivore interactions and influence prey suppression. Ecology 2000, 81:936-947.
13. Gershenzon J. The cost of plant chemical defense against herbivory: a biochemical perspective. Insect-Plant Interactions 1994, vol. 5:105-173. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
14. Glynn C., Rönnberg-Wästljung A.C., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Weih M. Willow genotype, but not drought treatment, affects foliar phenolic concentrations and leaf-beetle resistance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2004, 113:1-14.
15. Groenteman R., Guershon M., Coll M. Effects of leaf nitrogen content on oviposition site selection, offspring performance, and intraspecific interactions in an omnivorous bug. Ecological Entomology 2006, 31:155-161.
16. Kelly M.T., Curry J.P. The influence of phenolic compounds on the suitability of 3 Salix species as hosts for the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1991, 61:25-32.
17. Lauenstein G. Zur Aufnahme von Pflanzen durch die Räuberische Blumenwanze Anthocoris nemorum [Hem.: Heteroptera]. Entomophaga 1979, 24:431-441.
18. McMurtry J.A., Croft B.A. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 1997, 42:291-321.
19. Ode P.J., Berenbaum M.R., Zangerl A.R., Hardy I.C.W. Host plant, host plant chemistry and the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma sosares: indirect effects in a tritrophic interaction. Oikos 2004, 104:388-400.
20. Peacock L., Herrick S. Responses of the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima to genetically and spatially diverse Salix spp. plantations. Journal of Applied Ecology 2000, 37:821-831.
21. Peacock L., Hunter T., Turner H., Brain P. Does host genotype diversity affect the distribution of insect and disease damage in willow cropping systems? Journal of Applied Ecology 2001, 38:1070-1081.
22. Penuelas J., Llusia J. BVOCs: plant defense against climate warming? Trends in Plant Science 2003, 8:105-109.
23. Price P.W., Bouton C.E., Gross P., McPheron B.A., Thompson J.N., Weis A.E. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1980, 11:41-65.
24. Rehr S.S., Feeny P.P., Janzen D.H. Chemical defence in in Central American non-ant-acacias. Journal of Animal Ecology 1973, 42:405-416.
25. Rodriguez-Saona C., Thaler J.S. Herbivore-induced responses and patch heterogeneity affect abundance of arthropods on plants. Ecological Entomology 2005, 30:156-163.
26. Rudgers J.A., Strauss S.Y., Wendel J.F. Trade-offs among anti-herbivore resistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 2004, 91:878-880.
27. Sigsgaard L. Oviposition preference of Anthocoris nemorum and A. nemoralis for apple and pear. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2004, 111:215-223.
28. Stenberg J.A., Witzell J., Ericson L. Tall herb herbivory resistance reflects historic exposure to leaf beetles in a boreal archipelago age-gradient. Oecologia 2006, 148:414-425.
29. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. van der Meijden E., Wijn M., Verkaar H.J. Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 1988, 51:355-363.